ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has been used for years in the assessment of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) perfusion, it has not yet been established when it should be performed during the surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether it is better to perform the test on the donor or recipient sites. METHODS: Intraoperative perfusion of 46 DIEP flaps was assessed twice, on the donor and recipient sites. Differences between both ischemic areas of each flap were statistically analyzed. In addition, perforator location and risk factors were evaluated in order to assess whether they are associated with changes in the perfusion of the flap between both sites. RESULTS: Differences between ischemic areas on the donor and recipient sites were statistically significant (pâ¯=â¯0.012). However, in most cases (82.6%) the ischemic area was the same on both sites, and the final flap design only changed in two cases (4.3%) because of the ICGA findings on the recipient site. Besides, performing the ICGA on the donor site facilitated the identification of the best perfused areas, allowed a better planning of its placement into the recipient site, and also can be useful to choose the best perforator. Bilateral DIEP flap, lateral location of the perforator and tobacco use had a statistically significant association with lower probability to increase the perfusion area between both sites. CONCLUSIONS: several advantages have been found in performing the ICGA on the donor site to assess the perfusion of the DIEP flap.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Epigastric Arteries/transplantation , Indocyanine Green , Mammaplasty/methods , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Adult , Angiography/methods , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Intraoperative Care/methods , Mastectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Myocutaneous Flap/blood supply , Myocutaneous Flap/transplantation , Perforator Flap/transplantation , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , SpainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fat necrosis is a frequent complication (up to 62.5%) of microsurgical breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. This could have important clinical and psychological repercussions, deteriorating the results and increasing reconstruction costs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the intraoperative use of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to reduce fat necrosis in DIEP flap. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent unilateral DIEP flap procedures for breast reconstruction after oncological mastectomy were included (24 cases with intraoperative use of ICGA during surgery, 37 cases in the control group). The follow-up period was 1 year after surgery. The association between the use of ICGA and the incidence of fat necrosis in the first postoperative year, differences in fat necrosis grade (I-V), differences in fat necrosis requiring reoperation, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of fat necrosis was reduced from 59.5% (control group) to 29% (ICG-group) (P = 0.021) (relative risk = 0.49 [95% CI, 0.25-0.97]). The major difference was in grade II (27% vs 2.7%, P = 0.038). The number of second surgeries for fat necrosis treatment was also reduced (45.9% vs 20.8%, P = 0.046). The ICG group had higher scores on the BREAST-Q. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ICGA is a useful technique for reconstructive microsurgery that might improve patient satisfaction and reduce the incidence of fat necrosis by half as well as reduce its grade, especially in small fat necrosis cases; consequently, ICGA could reduce the number of secondary surgeries for treatment of fat necrosis.