Effect of HIV and Interpersonal Trauma on Cortical Thickness, Cognition, and Daily Functioning.

BACKGROUND: Interpersonal trauma (IPT) is highly prevalent among HIV-positive (HIV+) individuals, but its relationship with brain morphology and function is poorly understood. SETTING: This cross-sectional analysis evaluated the associations of IPT with cognitive task performance, daily functioning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain cortical thickness, and bilateral volumes of 4 selected basal ganglia regions in a US-based cohort of aviremic HIV+ individuals, with (HIV+ IPT+) and without IPT exposure (HIV+ IPT-), and sociodemographically matched HIV-negative controls with (HIV- IPT+) and without IPT exposure (HIV- IPT-). METHODS: Enrollees completed brain MRI scans, a semistructured psychiatric interview, a neurocognitive battery, and 3 measures of daily functioning. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the 4 groups were described, and pairwise between-group comparisons performed using χ tests, analysis of variance, or t-tests. Linear or Poisson regressions evaluated relationships between group status and the outcomes of interest, in 6 pairwise comparisons, using Bonferroni correction for statistical significance. RESULTS: Among 187 participants (mean age 50.0 years, 63% male, 64% non-white), 102 were HIV+ IPT+, 35 were HIV+ IPT-, 26 were HIV- IPT-, and 24 were HIV- IPT+. Compared with the remaining 3 groups, the HIV+ IPT+ group had more activities of daily living declines, higher number of impaired Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory scores, and lower cortical thickness in multiple cerebral regions. Attention/working memory test performances were significantly better in HIV- IPT- compared with the HIV+ IPT+ and HIV+ IPT- groups. Basal ganglia MRI volumes were not significantly different in any between-group comparisons. CONCLUSION: IPT exposure and HIV infection have a synergistic effect on daily functioning and cortical thickness in aviremic HIV+ individuals.

Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis.

Opioid use in chronic pain treatment is complex, as patients may derive both benefit and harm. Identification of individuals currently using opioids in a problematic way is important given the substantial recent increases in prescription rates and consequent increases in morbidity and mortality. The present review provides updated and expanded information regarding rates of problematic opioid use in chronic pain. Because previous reviews have indicated substantial variability in this literature, several steps were taken to enhance precision and utility. First, problematic use was coded using explicitly defined terms, referring to different patterns of use (ie, misuse, abuse, and addiction). Second, average prevalence rates were calculated and weighted by sample size and study quality. Third, the influence of differences in study methodology was examined. In total, data from 38 studies were included. Rates of problematic use were quite broad, ranging from <1% to 81% across studies. Across most calculations, rates of misuse averaged between 21% and 29% (range, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13%-38%). Rates of addiction averaged between 8% and 12% (range, 95% CI: 3%-17%). Abuse was reported in only a single study. Only 1 difference emerged when study methods were examined, where rates of addiction were lower in studies that identified prevalence assessment as a primary, rather than secondary, objective. Although significant variability remains in this literature, this review provides guidance regarding possible average rates of opioid misuse and addiction and also highlights areas in need of further clarification.