A Micro-computed Tomography Analysis of Marginal and Internal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Three CAD/CAM Materials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the marginal and internal misfit of endocrowns fabricated from a resin matrix ceramic (CS), a partially crystallized (EMC), and a fully crystallized (ILS) lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty human premolar teeth restored with endocrowns were investigated. Three CAD/CAM materials were used (n=10 per group): CS, EMC, and ILS. Two-dimensional (2D) analysis of marginal and internal misfit was performed on micro-computed tomography scans before and after adhesive bonding. Further, three-dimensional (3D) analysis was performed to determine the total internal volume discrepancy. Surface roughness of the fitting surfaces of endocrowns was characterized using optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Adhesive bonding did not significantly affect marginal or internal misfit (p≥0.093). Differences in marginal misfit among the experimental groups were not statistically significant (p≥0.221). However, differences in 2D internal misfit were statistically significant; the CS group exhibited the largest internal misfit (p=0.001), while no significant difference was found between other groups (p=0.123). The largest discrepancies were observed at the pulpal floor and cervical region of all investigated specimens. No statistically significant difference was found in 3D misfit between ILS and EMC groups (p=0.711); however both exhibited statistically lower 3D misfit values compared to the CS group (p≤0.037). ILS endocrowns exhibited the smoothest and most homogenous fitting surface profile (p<0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between 2D internal misfit and the surface roughness (p≥0.082). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of CAD/CAM material may influence the fitting accuracy of endocrowns. The investigated lithium disilicate glass-ceramics conferred superior internal fit for endocrowns compared to resin matrix ceramic.

Color Changes Associated with Sandblasting, Hydrofluoric Acid Etching, and Er:YAG Laser Irradiation of Milled Feldspathic Porcelain Laminate Veneers.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate color changes in milled feldspathic porcelain laminate veneers following hydrofluoric acid etching (HFA), sandblasting (SB), or Er:YAG laser irradiation (LI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Disc-shaped specimens (thickness=1 mm, diameter=8 mm) were milled from feldspathic porcelain blocks (n=40). Glazed specimens were randomly assigned to four subgroups (n=10 each) according to surface treatment: negative control, HFA, SB, and LI. A layer of translucent, light-cured resin cement (thickness=0.1 mm) was then applied following silanization. The color was characterized by the L*, a*, and b* uniform color space (CIE) using a reflection spectrophotometer. CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) was calculated to determine the color difference between each surface treatment and negative control groups. Data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc tests. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in CIEL* and CIEb* coordinates between negative control and all surface treatment groups (p≥0.108). The SB group demonstrated significantly lower mean CIEa* (higher greenish hue) compared to other groups (p≤0.003). HFA exhibited significantly higher CIEa* (closer to red) when compared to LI (p=0.039). LI induced the smallest overall color change compared to negative control (ΔE00=1.43 [1.07]). However, the differences in ΔE00 values were not statistically significant (p=0.648). CONCLUSIONS: The tested surface treatments did not affect the lightness or the yellowness of the 1-mm-thick milled feldspathic porcelain veneers. However, sandblasting resulted in a significant increase in the greenish hue. The Er:YAG laser resulted in the closest ΔE00 (1.43) to the 50:50% perceptibility threshold (ΔE00=1.2).

Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.

Objective: This paper reports data which helps identify changes and trends in the provision of indirect fixed prostheses in general dental practice in the UK. To determine by means of an anonymous, self-report questionnaire, the current trend in the provision of fixed prosthodontic treatments, with a special emphasis on the choice of treatment modalities, techniques and materials. Methods: The data presented were extracted from the data obtained from a validated,121-question questionnaire distributed at random to general dental practitioners in the UK attending postgraduate meetings in 2015/2016, with a wide distribution of locations. Results: A response rate exceeding 66% was achieved. Amalgam and light-cured composite were the preferred material for core build-up of vital teeth for around 62% of the respondents. Dentine pins were still being used by 66% of the respondents. The vast majority of respondents (92%) used a post and core to restore root-treated teeth. Fibre posts were the most commonly used (63%) type of preformed post among the respondents. Using the opposing and adjacent teeth as a reference to control tooth structure reduction during vital tooth preparation was the most common method, used by 42% of the respondents. Addition-cured silicone impression materials were the most frequently used impression material (78%). The surveyed practitioners were equally split between precious and non-precious metals as the substructure for indirect restorations. Glass-ionomer luting cements (47%) and resin-based cements (52%) were the most commonly used to cement porcelain fused to metal and zirconia indirect restorations, respectively. Laboratory made aesthetic veneers were prescribed by half of the respondents, while a third of them preferred direct resin composite as a veneer material. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that there has been an increase in the use of adhesive bonding and metal-free restorations. Amalgam and dentine pinscontinued to be used, contrary to international trends. Studies of the type reported are considered important in investigating trends and developments in dentistry.

Assessment of efficacy and post-bleaching sensitivity of home bleaching using 10% carbamide peroxide in extended and non-extended bleaching trays.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the effect of extended margin and conventional bleaching trays on tooth bleaching and tooth sensitivity. METHOD AND METHODS: Twenty subjects (18-56 years) were investigated in a split arch design clinical study that was conducted in a general dental practice. Each subject received a custom made bleaching tray and 10% carbamide peroxide gel. The bleaching trays had the borders extended 5 mm beyond the gingival margins on the right side and finished just at the gingival margin on the left side. Shade change and tooth sensitivity were the primary outcomes studied and analysed in this study. The shade of the six upper and lower anterior teeth was assessed using a value-ordered shade guide before, one week and two weeks after treatment. Sensitivity was self-assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at the end of the first and second weeks of the study. RESULTS: At the end of week two, the mean shade change was 5.01 (± 3.37) and 5.10 (± 3.36) for teeth covered by extended and non-extended tray design, respectively. The mean VAS sensitivity scores for teeth covered by extended and non-extended tray design were 0.96 (± 1.39) and 0.66 (± 0.96), respectively. There was no significant statistical difference between the two designs at any assessment point with regard to shade change and sensitivity (p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that an extended tray design confers no superior effect in terms of the whitening outcome achieved or in reducing levels of sensitivity. Thus, both tray designs can be used depending on a dentist's personal preference.