Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Arch ; 77(2): 132-136, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260801

ABSTRACT

Background: The clinical learning environment is a fundamental component of healthcare education. In this setting, students can develop the skills and knowledge necessary to become competent and efficient healthcare practitioners. Due to the importance of clinically based education, it is crucial to have a valid and reliable tool to enable its evaluation. Objective: The aim of this study was to use the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) to examine the perceptions of Saudi undergraduate healthcare students regarding their actual and preferred clinical learning environment and explore the differences between the two viewpoints. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was utilised with a cohort of Saudi undergraduate healthcare students. Data regarding perceptions of the 'actual' and 'preferred' clinical learning environments were gathered with the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory tool. Results: A total of 194 students participated and nine healthcare disciplines were represented. The highest mean score for both 'actual' and 'preferred' clinical learning environment was for the subscale Task Orientation. Significant differences between 'actual' and 'preferred' environments were demonstrated for Innovation and Individualization, with both subscales scoring higher for the 'preferred' environment. All five subscales-Individualization, Innovation, Involvement, Personalization, and Task Orientation-appear to be important aspects contributing to student satisfaction with their clinical learning environment. Conclusion: Saudi healthcare students demonstrate a preference for a clinical learning environment with the utilization of new and interesting experiences, as well as recognition and accommodation of student individuality. Additionally, student satisfaction appears to be multifactorial in origin. Therefore, there may be many avenues available to enhance the clinical experiences of healthcare students, which is vitally important for the optimization of clinical learning opportunities.


Subject(s)
Motivation , Students, Nursing , Humans , Saudi Arabia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Learning , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36011457

ABSTRACT

Objective: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted healthcare systems worldwide, resulting in decreased and delayed hospital visits of patients with non-COVID-19-related acute emergencies. We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation and outcomes of patients with non-COVID-19-related medical and surgical emergencies. Method: All non-COVID-19-related patients hospitalized through emergency departments in three tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain in June and July 2020 were enrolled and categorized into delayed and non-delayed groups (presentation ≥/=24 or <24 h after onset of symptom). Primary outcome was the prevalence and cause of delayed presentation; secondary outcomes included comparative 28-day clinical outcomes (i.e., 28-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, and acute surgical interventions). Mean, median, and IQR were used to calculate the primary outcomes and inferential statistics including chi-square/Fisher exact test, t-test where appropriate were used for comparisons. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with delay in seeking medical attention. Results: In total, 24,129 patients visited emergency departments during the study period, compared to 48,734 patients in the year 2019. Of the 256 hospitalized patients with non-COVID-19-related diagnoses, 134 (52%) had delayed presentation. Fear of COVID-19 and curfew-related restrictions represented 46 (34%) and 25 (19%) of the reasons for delay. The 28-day mortality rates were significantly higher among delayed patients vs. non-delayed patients (n = 14, 10.4% vs. n = 3, 2.5%, OR: 4.628 (CI: 1.296−16.520), p = 0.038). Conclusion: More than half of hospitalized patients with non-COVID-19-related diagnoses had delayed presentation to the ED where mortality was found to be significantly higher in this group. Fear of COVID-19 and curfew restrictions were the main reasons for delaying hospital visit.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Emergencies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...