Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 12425, 2021 06 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127708

ABSTRACT

Saliva has significant advantages as a test medium for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients, such as ease of collection, minimal requirement of supplies and trained personnel, and safety. Comprehensive validation in a large cohort of prospectively collected specimens with unknown SARS-CoV-2 status should be performed to evaluate the potential and limitations of saliva-based testing. We developed a saliva-based testing pipeline for detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) readouts, and measured samples from 137 outpatients tested at a curbside testing facility and 29 inpatients hospitalized for COVID-19. These measurements were compared to the nasal swab results for each patient performed by a certified microbiology laboratory. We found that our saliva testing positively detects 100% (RT-PCR) and 93.75% (ddPCR) of curbside patients that were identified as SARS-CoV-2 positive by the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) certified nasal swab testing assay. Quantification of viral loads by ddPCR revealed an extremely wide range, with 1 million-fold difference between individual patients. Our results demonstrate for both community screening and hospital settings that saliva testing reliability is on par with that of the nasal swabs in detecting infected cases, and has potential for higher sensitivity when combined with ddPCR in detecting low-abundance viral loads that evade traditional testing methods.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Saliva/virology , Adult , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/metabolism , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Viral Load
2.
medRxiv ; 2020 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330880

ABSTRACT

Saliva has significant advantages as a test medium for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients, such as ease of collection, minimal requirement of supplies and trained personnel, and safety. Comprehensive validation in a large cohort of prospectively collected specimens with unknown SARS-CoV-2 status should be performed to evaluate the potential and limitations of saliva-based testing. We developed a saliva-based testing pipeline for detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) readouts, and measured samples from 137 outpatients tested at a curbside testing facility and 29 inpatients hospitalized for COVID-19. These measurements were compared to the nasal swab results for each patient performed by a certified microbiology laboratory. We found that our saliva testing positively detects 100% (RT-PCR) and 93.75% (ddPCR) of curbside patients that were identified as SARS-CoV-2 positive by the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) certified nasal swab testing assay. Quantification of viral loads by ddPCR revealed an extremely wide range, with 1 million-fold difference between individual patients. Our results demonstrate for both community screening and hospital settings that saliva testing reliability is on par with that of the nasal swabs in detecting infected cases, and has potential for higher sensitivity when combined with ddPCR in detecting low-abundance viral loads that evade traditional testing methods.

3.
J Hematol ; 8(4): 149-154, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32300462

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome of excessive systemic inflammation which causes tissue damage due to abnormal immune system activation and has a high fatality rate even with treatment. HLH continues to be a difficult diagnosis to make because of lack of awareness and its overlap with other illnesses. This disorder is well defined in pediatric patients under the age of 18, but there is also a paucity of data in the adult population. The goals of this study were to describe associated disorders, clinical course and outcomes, and to determine if additional clinical criteria can be used to help with the diagnosis of HLH in adult patients. METHODS: Patients' electronic medical records from 2007 to 2017 (who were ≥ 18 years old at the time of the search) were screened by ICD 9 and ICD 10 codes which contain the diagnosis of HLH or hemophagocytic syndrome, infection-associated. We identified 41 adult cases of HLH that were treated at our medical center over the course of 10 years and assessed these patients using both the historical and newly proposed diagnostic criteria. We also identified underlying diagnoses related to the development of HLH and fatality rates. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 55 years old (18 - 87 years old) and 22 were male. Twenty-two had an infection, 16 with malignancy, seven had an autoimmune disorder and one with Sweet syndrome. Fifteen patients were treated with steroids alone, 18 with steroids and chemotherapy, three with steroids and antiviral agents, and two with chemotherapy alone. Sixteen (39%) died and 25 (60%) survived discharge. Seven patients died after discharge. Median survival of all patients was 1,095 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that HLH is primarily associated with infections and malignancies. Newly proposed diagnostic criteria are not as specific, but can be helpful in making the diagnosis of HLH. We also showed that the fatality rate at our institution was lower than currently published rates of adult HLH.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...