Longer peripheral-track lesions are associated with instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

BACKGROUND: The glenoid track concept has enabled the categorization of Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) into on-track lesions and off-track lesions. Furthermore, among the on-track lesions, further categorization has been established based on the distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track, into peripheral-track lesions and central-track lesions. Recent studies on peripheral-track lesions and central-track lesions within the glenoid track have shown inconsistencies in failure rates, which deserves further investigation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort comparison of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2015 and 2020 was performed. 102 patients with peripheral-track HSLs were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the results of the postoperative apprehension test: the apprehension positive group (n = 30), and the apprehension negative group (n = 72). Using preoperative computed tomography (CT) and an image reconstruction program, 3-dimensional (3D) images were segmented to calculate the length, width, depth, and distance of the HSLs. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the risk factors of recurrence, for which odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were provided. RESULTS: A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the length of the peripheral-track HSLs was a significant independent predictor of failure in this study. (OR 1.380; 95% CI 1.170-1.627; P < .001). The receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) demonstrated a predictive power (area under the curve = 0.841) and a threshold value of 14.2 mm. CONCLUSION: Length was the only risk factor for the recurrent instability of peripheral-track HSLs after ABR. In the context of surgical decision-making, utilizing the glenoid track concept, medical practitioners may need to evaluate instability by considering the length as a continuous factor, while differentiating between peripheral-track and central-track classifications.

Factors affecting range of motion following two-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic knee infection.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that affect range of motion (ROM) following two-stage revision arthroplasty as a treatment for chronic periprosthetic knee infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 98 patients diagnosed with chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty between January 2009 and December 2019 and then underwent two-stage revision arthroplasty were reviewed retrospectively. Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors that affect ROM after two-stage revision arthroplasty. ROM after two-stage revision arthroplasty was used as a dependent variable, while age at the time of surgery, ROM at PJI diagnosis, ROM after the first-stage surgery, the interval between the first-stage surgery and the second-stage surgery, whether a re-operation was performed before the second-stage surgery, culture results (culture negative or culture positive), and body mass index (BMI) were used as independent variables. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis (R2 = 0.843) revealed that among the independent variables, ROM (ß = 0.604, P < 0.001) after the first-stage surgery, whether a re-operation was performed before the second-stage surgery (ß = - 8.847, P < 0.001), the interval between the first-stage surgery and the second-stage surgery (ß = - 0.778, P = 0.003), and BMI (ß = - 0.698, P = 0.041) were associated with ROM after two-stage revision arthroplasty, the dependent variable. CONCLUSIONS: In two-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic knee infection, ROM after the first-stage surgery, whether a re-operation was performed before the second-stage surgery, the interval between the first-stage surgery and the second-stage surgery, and BMI were found to be factors that were associated with ROM after two-stage revision arthroplasty.

Biomechanical Comparative Study for Osteosynthesis of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fractures: Conventional Devices versus Novel Fixed Angle Devices.

Purpose: Osteosynthesis has been recommended for treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in young patients. However, no implant of choice has been reported so far. This study was conducted in order to compare the fixation stability of two conventional fixation methods with three different novel fixed angle devices in this type of fracture. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 composite femurs (4th Generation Saw bone; Pacific Research Laboratories, USA) corresponding to human bone were used. Pauwels type III fracture type was uniformly reproduced. Specimens were fixed with a cannulated screw, cannulated screw with cable, and Intertan nail, dynamic hip screw, and IKEY nail. Measurement of failure loads and the rotational change of the femoral head fragment was performed for evaluation of fixation stability. Results: All implants were compared with cannulated screw and dynmaic hip screw. No meaningful improvement was observed for the cannulated screw with cable compared with the cannulated screw and dynamic hip screw. Meaningful improvement in load-to-failure and y-rotation and z-rotation was observed for both the Intertan nail and IKEY nail compared with the cannulated screw. However, compared with the dynamic hip screw, only the IKEY nail showed improvement in the same profile but the Intertan nail did not. Conclusion: Among novel fixed angle devices, meaningful improvement was observed for the IKEY nail compared with conventional implants. Strengths of this implant include biomechanical stability and simplicity of surgical technique, indicating that it may be another good option for osteosynthesis of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes after management of intra-articular lesions in acute ankle fractures with arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Anatomically surgical reduction of ankle fractures does not always result in a clinically favorable outcome. Arthroscopic examination combined with treatment of intra-articular lesion may related to clinical outcomes OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to review initial and second look arthroscopic finding of acute ankle fracture and to evaluate clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Lauge-Hansen classification system of ankle fractures included supination-external rotation type (n = 24), supination-adduction type (n = 3), pronation-external rotation type (n = 7), and pronation-abduction type (n = 6), total 40 ankles. Osteochondral lesions were found in 25 ankles (62%) with an initial arthroscopic finding of acute ankle fracture. Newly discovered chondral lesions in secondary arthroscopy were found in 17 cases. According to the Ferkel and Cheng staging at secondary arthroscopy, 4 of 25 ankles with osteochondral lesions of the talus were deteriorating (more than stage D). In terms of ICRS overall repair grades, 5 ankles (20%) were abnormal (grade III). Diffuse synovitis and arthrofibrosis were found in 12 and 7 ankles, respectively, in secondary arthroscopy, and correlations were found between AOFAS scores, VAS and intra-articular lesions. CONCLUSION: Second-look arthroscopic examination combined with treatment of intra-articular lesion such as arthrofibrosis and osteochondral lesion arising from ankle fracture surgery may consider to improve clinical outcomes.

Influence of Glenoid Labral Bumper Height and Capsular Volume on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair as Assessed With Serial CT Arthrogram: Can Anterior-Inferior Volume Fraction Be a Prognostic Factor?

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic labral repair combined with capsular plication decreases joint volume and restores glenoid labral bumper height; thus, the procedure helps decrease capsular redundancy. However, the decreased volume and restored glenoid labral bumper height could change over time, which could influence the outcome of the operation. PURPOSE: To (1) measure glenoid labral bumper height and capsular volume quantitatively in serial computed tomography arthrography (CTA) and evaluate the relationship between bumper height and joint volume and (2) compare the difference in bumper height and joint volume between groups with and without apprehension after arthroscopic Bankart repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who had undergone arthroscopic Bankart repair between January 2012 and June 2016, and were assessed by CTA 3 to 6 months and 12 to 18 months after the operation were included. An image reconstruction program (3-dimensional slicer) was used to calculate inferior, anterior-inferior, and posterior-inferior joint volumes; the ratio of the anterior-inferior volume to the inferior volume was defined as the anterior-inferior volume fraction (VFAI). We also measured glenoid labral bumper height at the 5-, 4-, and 3-o'clock positions. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled as study participants (mean age, 25.2 ± 9.29 years). Of these, 10 patients had either redislocation or apprehension, and 40 patients had neither. A significant correlation was observed between 5-o'clock glenoid labral bumper height and VFAI on early CTA (3-6 months) and late CTA (12-18 months) (early CTA: Pearson coefficient, -0.335, P = .040; late CTA: Pearson coefficient, -0.468, P = .003). VFAI at the early CTA was 42.20 ± 10.15 in the group with apprehension and 33.49 ± 9.66 in the group without apprehension; a significant difference was observed. VFAI at the late CTA was 45.84 ± 11.97 in the group with apprehension and 37.65 ± 9.70 in the group without apprehension and thus showed a significant difference between the 2 groups. However, the 3-, 4-, and 5-o'clock glenoid labral bumper heights on early and late CTAs did not show a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative VFAI is related to postoperative apprehension and redislocation and might be reduced by increasing the 5-o'clock glenoid labral bumper height.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Patients With Lax Healing After Medial Meniscal Root Repair: Comparison With Subtotal Meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: To compare radiologic and clinical outcomes between patients who underwent medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair and were subsequently classified as having lax healing based on second-look arthroscopy and patients who underwent subtotal meniscectomy for an MMPRT. METHODS: The patients who received pullout repair or subtotal meniscectomy due to MMPRT between January 2011 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the patients who underwent MMPRT repair, those whose lax healing of the repair site was confirmed by second-look arthroscopy (repair/lax healing group) and among the patients who received subtotal meniscectomy, those who have varus deformity of <5° and a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of ≤2 (meniscectomy group) were included in the study population. Medial joint space width, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, and Lysholm Knee score were used for radiologic and clinical assessment. RESULTS: The meniscectomy group included 24 patients (average follow-up, 37.2 months), and the repair/lax healing group included 21 patients (average follow-up, 39.2 months). The 2 groups showed improved patient-reported outcomes postoperatively (P < .001). However, medial joint space width (P < .001) became narrow and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (P = .002 and P = .005, respectively) worsened. Comparison of the radiologic outcomes between the 2 groups revealed that the repair/lax healing group had less Kellgren-Lawrence grade progression than the meniscectomy group (P = .014). The grade progressed by ≥2 grades in 4 patients (16.7%) and 0 patients in the meniscectomy and repair/lax healing groups, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the repair/lax healing group showed improved functional outcomes on short-term follow-up, arthritic change progressed radiologically. Nevertheless, the repair/lax healing group showed better radiologic outcomes than the meniscectomy group, despite lax healing of the repair site. However, because of the small number of cases in this study, the results of this study could be associated with potential for type II or ß errors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tear: Concurrent Concept and Treatment.

Delaminated rotator cuff tear pertains to the horizontal split of the tendon substance. As reported previously, the presence of a delaminated tear and incidence of delaminated rotator cuff tear ranges from 38% to 92%. The different strain intensities applied across the rotator cuff tendon, and the shear stress between the bursal and articular layers seem to play a role in its pathogenesis. In a delaminated rotator cuff tear, the degree and direction of retraction between two layers differ, with accompanying intrasubstance cleavage. A surgeon therefore needs to consider and carefully evaluate the tear characteristics when repairing delaminated rotator cuff tear. Delaminated rotator cuff tear is considered to be a poor prognostic factor after rotator cuff repair, but numerous surgical repair techniques have been introduced and applied to resolve this problem. Recent literature has reported good clinical outcomes after delaminated rotator cuff repair.