ABSTRACT
Accumulative evidence suggests metabolic disorders correlate with prostate cancer. Metabolic profiling of urine allows the measurement of numerous metabolites simultaneously. This study set up a metabolomic platform consisting of UPLC-FTMS and UPLC-ion trap MSn for urine metabolome analysis. The platform improved retention time, mass accuracy, and signal stability. Additionally, the product ion spectrum obtained from ion trap MSn facilitated structure elucidation of candidate metabolites, especially when authentic standards were not available. Urine samples from six hernia patients and six BPH patients were used for the initial establishment of the analytic platform. This platform was further employed to analyze the urine samples of 27 PCa and 49 BPH patients. Choosing the upper and lower 16% of metabolites, 258 metabolite candidates were selected. Twenty-four of them with AUC values larger than 0.65 were further selected. Eighteen of the twenty-four features can be matched in METLIN and HMDB. Eleven of the eighteen features can be interpreted by MSn experiments. They were used for the combination achieving the best differential power. Finally, four metabolites were combined to reach the AUC value of 0.842 (CI 95, 0.7559 to 0.9279). This study demonstrates the urinary metabolomic analysis of prostate cancer and sheds light on future research.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early detection of bladder cancer remains challenging because patients with early-stage bladder cancer usually have no incentive to take cytology or cystoscopy tests if they are asymptomatic. Our goal is to find non-invasive marker candidates that may help us gain insight into the metabolism of early-stage bladder cancer and be examined in routine health checks. RESULTS: We acquired urine samples from 124 patients diagnosed with early-stage bladder cancer or hernia (63 cancer patients and 61 controls). In which 100 samples were included in our marker discovery cohort, and the remaining 24 samples were included in our independent test cohort. We obtained metabolic profiles of 922 compounds of the samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Based on the metabolic profiles of the marker discovery cohort, we selected marker candidates using Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni correction and leave-one-out cross-validation; we further excluded compounds detected in less than 60% of the bladder cancer samples. We finally selected eight putative markers. The abundance of all the eight markers in bladder cancer samples was high but extremely low in hernia samples. Moreover, the up-regulation of these markers might be in association with sugars and polyols metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, comparative urine metabolomics selected putative metabolite markers for the detection of early-stage bladder cancer. The suggested relations between early-stage bladder cancer and sugars and polyols metabolism may create opportunities for improving the detection of bladder cancer.
