ABSTRACT
Patients with acute lung injury are ventilated by conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) rather than high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV). This study estimated the potential usefulness of HFJV in acute lung injury. The issue was addressed by comparing the effects on lung function of CMV and HFJV in two rabbit models of neonatal acute lung injury: repetitive saline lung lavage (LAV) and meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) induced by intratracheal meconium instillation. The animals were then ventilated with either HFJV or CMV for 4 h. Ventilatory pressures, blood gases, and indexes of gas exchange were assessed. Lung edema formation was expressed as wet-dry lung weight ratio. Both LAV and MAS significantly decreased lung compliance, increased airway resistance, and caused severe hypoxemia, hypercarbia, and acidosis. Although CMV was superior to HFJV at 1 h of ventilation, there were no clinically relevant differences in lung function or edema formation between CMV and LAV in both models of respiratory insufficiency at 4 h of ventilation. We conclude that, HFJV may be used for ventilation in acute non-homogenous lung injury.
