Kidney Transplantation from a Deceased Donor with COVID-19 Ad26.COV2-S Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND Vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia is a rare immune disorder documented after adenoviral vector ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2-S (Janssen) vaccine administration against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. It is a rare adverse effect with an incidence of 1 case per 100 000 exposures. The disorder represents altered immune response with proliferation of antibodies that bind to platelet factor 4 (PF4), leading to formation of thrombi and consumptive coagulopathy. Thrombosis combined with thrombocytopenia generally occurs in the first month following vaccination and can lead to fatal outcome, even in young, previously healthy individuals. These young adults ultimately may become solid organ donors. The main concerns with vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia solid organ donors are anti-PF4 antibodies transmission potential, risk of early major graft thrombosis, and serious bleeding. CASE REPORT In our center, 2 kidney transplantations were performed from a single brain-dead vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donor following Ad26.COV2-S COVID-19 (Janssen) vaccine in October 2021, which represents the first 2 cases of kidney transplantation from a deceased vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donor after immunization with Ad26.COV2-S (Janssen) vaccine. Both recipients were closely monitored in the early post-transplantation period and after discharge from the hospital. To date, both recipients have a good functioning allograft, without any evidence of vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia transmission. CONCLUSIONS Our results are consistent with those of previously published cases of successful vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donor solid organ transplantation. Kidney allografts transplanted from vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donors can have a good overall function with favorable outcomes.

Urothelial carcinoma in a urinary bladder diverticulum: A case report and review of the literature.

Bladder diverticula are defined as an outpouching of the mucosa into the muscle layer of the bladder wall. There is a well-known link between urinary bladder diverticula and tumors arising within the diverticula. They are rare with an incidence rate of 0.8%-10%. We report an intradiverticular urothelial carcinoma in a 72-year-old man with a known history of multiple episodes of acute urinary retention and urinary tract infections, followed by transurethral resection of the benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to transrectal prostate biopsy in Croatia: A national survey.

OBJECTIVES: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) is the standard of care for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Increased antibiotic resistance has led to the suspension of indication for fluoroquinolones use in prostate biopsy prophylaxis. Several classes of antibiotics have been recommended for routine use. Unequivocal consensus regarding antibiotic prophylaxis has not been made to date. The objective of the study was to assess the diversity of antimicrobial prophylaxis among Croatian urologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was designed using Google Forms® and distributed to 19 urology public hospital's departments. Answers regarding infection risk assessment, type and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis were accumulated. Descriptive statistical analysis was preformed using Statistica 10.0® analytics software. RESULTS: Twelve urology departments answered the questionnaire, representing 63% of urology departments in Croatia. Six different antibiotic protocols have been reported. Fluoroquinolones were the most commonly prescribed class of antibiotics (84%). Antibiotic prophylaxis started 1 day before the procedure (92%). Average duration of antibiotic prophylaxis was 5 days (75%). In case of increased risk of urinary tract infection, 42% of departments changed the type, and 8% changed the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Neither department performed a rectal swab prior to prostate biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Various antimicrobial prophylaxis protocols are currently being used among Croatian urology departments. Lack of uniform guidelines contributes to protocol diverseness that inevitably leads to further increase in antibiotic resistance. New high quality studies are needed to reverse this trend and to facilitate the establishment of a uniform antimicrobial stewardship strategy.

Kidney transplantation from a living donor to a mentally disabled recipient with bilateral angiomyolipomas-A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Many centers do not perform transplantation in mentally disabled people. Our patient with progressive psychomotor developmental delay had bilateral angiomyolipomas. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: Three years ago she underwent a right nephrectomy for massive spontaneous hemorrhage. The left kidney had a large, well-vascularized angiomyolipoma ready at any moment to bleed spontaneously was functioning normally. Two renal transplantation centers in Croatia refused to transplant from the patient's donor mother. The transplantation team had concerns whether to transplant a kidney to a person unable to care for herself, about who would take complete care of the patient, including regular immunosuppressive therapy, and whether it was ethically justified to explant a functioning kidney, although affected by angiomyolipomas, from a patient who required no renal replacement therapy at the time. CONCLUSION: We presented a successful kidney transplant in a mentally disabled person, clinical and ethical justifications for such a procedure, and a four-year post-transplant evaluation. Furthermore, in our opinion, renal transplantation in the mentally challenged needs to be referred to in literature exclusively as a relative contraindication instead of an absolute one, as has been practiced to date. This would facilitate transplantation teams deciding on kidney transplantation in mentally incapacitated individuals.

[Effect of pretransplant dialysis modality on incidence of early posttransplant infections in kidney recipients]. / Utjecaj tipa dijalize na pojavnost ranih infekcija nakon transplantacije bubrega.

INTRODUCTION: Infection is one of the main causes of patient death and graft failure early after kidney transplantation. Effect of pretransplant dialysis modality on incidence of infections after kidney transplantation still remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of pre-transplant dialysis modality on incidence urinary tract infections (UTI) and sepsis in early posttransplant period in kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case-control retrospective study a cohort of 72 kidney, kidney- pancreas or kidney-liver transplant recipients was included. Infection was defined by either clinical presentation or microbiological finding. Infections were categorized by localization and cause of infection. In patients on peritoneal dialysis peritoneal catheter was removed intraoperatively during transplantation. Infection rate during first three months posttransplant was analyzed. Difference in frequencies was calculated using nonparametric tests. Proportions were calculated using chi2 test. Time to first infection was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, p value < 0.05 criterion was used to decide statistical significance. RESULTS: The total number of infections per patient per day was not significantly different in peritoneal vs. hemodialysis modality (0,029 +/- 0.019 to 0,029 +/- 0,031, p=ns). Also, there was no significant difference in peritoneal vs. hemodialysis modality in the number of UTI (0.0156 +/- 0.0144 to 0,0165 +/- 0,0125, p=ns) and sepsis (0.0018 +/- 0.0044 to 0.0026 +/- 0.0019, p=ns) during first three months posttransplant. Similarly, no difference was noted between the groups in the location or cause of infection. Peritonitis prior to transplantation was not an independent risk factor for infections (p=0.37). In Cox regression PD was not an independent risk factor for either total infections, UTI, or sepsis. CONCLUSION: This study showed that there was not statistically significant difference in the risk for infection in first three months after kidney transplantation with respect to pretransplant dialysis modality. PD should be the first choice for renal replacement therapy in patients with end stage renal disease.

The value of urinary decoy cells finding in patients with kidney transplantation.

Childhood infection with polyomaviruses leads to a life-long latent infection of renal and urinary tract epithelia. Replication in the reno-urinary epithelium is associated with viral cytopathic changes such as nuclear inclusions and decoy cells. During the 2005-2009 period, cytological urine analysis was performed in 154 samples (94 male and 60 female) from patients with kidney transplantation (n = 19), simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) (n = 9) and simultaneous kidney and liver transplantation (n = 2). Urine samples were analyzed monthly following transplantation according to the protocol. The period from transplantation to the first occurrence of decoy cells in the urine and the period of decoy cell persistence in the urine were assessed. The presence of decoy cells (< 10 and > 10 decoy cells) and red blood cells (< 20 E, 20-100 E and > 100 E) per cytospin smear was semiquantitatively determined, along with analysis of inflammatory cells (neutrophilic granulocytes) and fungi. In patients with decoy cells detected, their sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive value for BK virus nephropathy were calculated. Correlation of the study parameters was estimated by use of Kruskal-Wallis test (Statistica 7.1, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA). Decoy cells were found in 30 patients (20 male and 10 female), age median 40 (range 16-69) years, at a mean of day 115 (range day 5-747) post transplantation, whereas their presence was recorded for a mean of 141 (range 77-771) days. Immunohistochemical staining of kidney biopsy sample for polyomavirus (SV40 large T-antigen) yielded positive reaction in 2/30 (7%) patients. Erythrocyturia was present in 29/30 patients with decoy cells. The number of decoy cells per cytospin smear generally ranged less than 10 in 25/30 patients, whereas more than 10 decoy cells per cytospin smear were only recorded in 5/30 patients. Immunohistochemistry produced positive finding for BK virus in one patient with SPKT and simultaneous kidney and liver transplantation each, which was statistically significantly more common as compared with patients with kidney transplantation alone (p = 0.0244). Immunohistochemical positivity for BK virus was more significant in cases with more than 10 decoy cells detected in cytospin smear (p = 0.013). In BK nephropathy, the finding of urinary decoy cells showed a 100% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 100% negative predictive value and 6% positive predictive value. BK virus nephropathy remains a significant post transplantation complication.