Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Surg Endosc ; 20(2): 322-4, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16333532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of the Harmonic Scalpel transduces a lower amount of energy to tissues, thereby limiting the potential for lateral thermal damage and deep penetration because only low temperatures are reached. The working principle of the Harmonic Scalpel is the transformation of electric power into the longitudinal mechanical movement of the instrument tip. This study aimed to determine the effects from varying durations of Harmonic Scalpel application on the experimental model of rat abdominal wall without skin. METHODS: After the rats had been anesthetized, and a laparotomy was performed. The Harmonic Scalpel shears were used on the muscular part of the abdominal wall without skin. Different durations of output power 3 were applied: a single 5-s application, a single 10-s application, and a regimen of two sequential 5-s applications. Each animal in each group of 10 received five individual activations, after which the animals were killed. Tissue samples were fixed and embedded in paraffin before sections were taken and stained. Using light microscopy and morphometric imaging analysis, the width of tissue lateral thermal damage was measured from the point of Harmonic Scalpel incision. RESULTS: The rat abdominal wall showed lateral thermal damage over a mean width of 0.0522 +/- 0.0097 mm after a 5-s Harmonic Scalpel application, a damage width of 0.1544 +/- 0.0419 mm after a 10-s application, and a damage width of 0.1020 +/- 0.0430 mm after a 5-s application followed by 5 s of inactivity and another 5 s of activity. These differences in thermal damage width between all the groups are statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The findings lead to the conclusion that tissue lateral thermal damage after Harmonic Scalpel application at standard output power is greater when a longer sustained period of application is used. Lateral thermal damage also is greater if the Harmonic Scalpel application time is continuous rather than of the same total duration with a brief midpoint interruption.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/etiology , Abdominal Wall , Burns/etiology , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Surgical Instruments/adverse effects , Abdominal Injuries/pathology , Abdominal Wall/pathology , Animals , Burns/pathology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Time Factors
2.
Chirurg ; 72(4): 425-32, 2001 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11357535

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal war injuries can be treated with primary repair or by colostomy. We report our experience with both treatments. METHODS: During the Croatian war from July 1991 to March 1994, 155 patients with colorectal injuries were treated at the Surgical Clinic, University Hospital Split. This group represents 7% of all patients (n = 2220) with gunshot and shrapnel wounds treated in this period at our clinic. The median patient age was 24.7 years (range 14-70 years). The majority of the patients (96.7%) were male. Concomitant injuries of the colon (83.7%) and rectum (69%) were found more frequently than isolated ones. 50 patients were operated on as emergencies in our clinic, while 105 were operated on in field hospitals. In 28 patients primary repair of the colorectal injury was performed (without derivation), whereas 127 patients were treated by colostomy. In those patients 106 wounds were closed electively during a second operation. The average in hospital stay was 32.3 days (range 10-65 days). RESULTS: Using PATI and FCIS scores for colorectal injuries, 80% of our patients had life-threatening injuries. In the cases with primary repair the percentage of complications was high (92%). In the cases with the diverting colostomy it was only 34%. The high complication rate in the cases with primary repair was directly related to the presence of the anastomotic leaks and subsequent peritonitis. Explorative laparotomy was an effective diagnostic tool especially in the field hospitals. The overall mortality rate was 3.2%. CONCLUSION: In our operative strategy we preferred derivation operations in order to decrease major complications due to anastomotic leakage or peritonitis.


Subject(s)
Colon/injuries , Rectum/injuries , Warfare , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Colon/diagnostic imaging , Colon/surgery , Colostomy , Croatia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Radiography , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Rectum/surgery , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Wounds, Gunshot/diagnostic imaging
3.
4.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 44(17): 1346-50, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9356853

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to introduce modified intraparietal vagotomy as a safe procedure and a method of choice in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. METHODOLOGY: Eighty-six patients with perforated duodenal ulcers underwent oversewing of the perforated ulcer and modified intraparietal selective vagotomy. The site of perforation was sewn over and an abdominal cavity lavage was performed. The posterior vagal nerve was resected, and a modified intraparietal anterior vagotomy was performed. During the postoperative period, after twenty days, six months and one year, respectively, we analyzed the following data: body weight, signs of gastroesophageal reflux, subjective discomfort, early postoperative complications, gastroduodenoscopic findings, basal acid output (BAO), and maximal acid output stimulated by pentagastrin (PAO). RESULTS: There was no mortality in our group, the post-operative morbidity was insignificant, and the duration of operation was shorter in comparison to other vagotomy methods. BAO and PAO values were similar to those in the literature when proximal selective vagotomy (PSV) was performed. There were no cases of duodenogastric or gastroesophageal reflux nor re-occurrence of ulcer disease, as confirmed by gastroduodenoscopy. According to the modified Visick's criteria, 94% of the patients followed-up were classified as group 1. CONCLUSION: We consider the modified intraparietal vagotomy to be the method of choice in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers because of the simple surgical technique involved, the shorter duration of surgery, and the avoidance of standard PSV complications. The surgery can be performed even by a less experienced surgeon, independently of the patient's age and condition. This modification is suitable for laparoscopic surgery.


Subject(s)
Duodenal Ulcer/surgery , Peptic Ulcer Perforation/surgery , Vagotomy, Proximal Gastric/methods , Adult , Duodenal Ulcer/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...