Deep phenotyping of MARS1 (interstitial lung and liver disease) and LARS1 (infantile liver failure syndrome 1) recessive multisystemic disease using Human Phenotype Ontology annotation: Overlap and differences. Case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Aminoacyl transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetases are associated with diseases when mutations occur in their encoding genes. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis can be caused by mutation in the methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MARS) gene while mutations in the leucine-tRNA synthetase (LARS) gene lead to infantile liver failure syndrome type 1. We report the case of a patient with LARS1 pathogenics variants and two patients with MARS1 pathogenics variants. The aim of this study was to analyze the phenotypes of our three patients in detail and classify cases in the literature using Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms. RESULTS: The first patient has two previously undescribed heterozygous variants in LARS1 (c.1818dup and c.463A>G). The other two patients' MARS1 variants (c.1177G>A and c.1700C>T) have already been described in the literature. All three patients had anemia, hepatomegaly, feeding difficulties, failure to thrive and hypoalbuminemia. Including ours, 65 patients are described in total, for whom 117 phenotypic abnormalities have been described at least once, 41.9% of which both in patients with LARS1 and MARS1 mutations. CONCLUSION: Patients with LARS1 and MARS1 mutations seem to share a common phenotype but further deep phenotyping studies are required to clarify the details of these complex pathologies.

Correlation Between Clinical Signs and High-resolution Manometry Data in Children.

OBJECTIVES: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. However, clinical signs associated with these disorders are nonspecific, and it is difficult to correlate clinical signs with HRM data. The main objective of our study was to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of each clinical sign, as well as their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. METHODS: This is a bicentric retrospective cohort study based on HRM data collected between May 2012 and May 2016. The studied symptoms were weight loss, feeding difficulties, swallowing disorders, dysphagia, food blockages, vomiting, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), belching, and respiratory symptoms. HRM data were analyzed according to the Chicago Classification (3.0). RESULTS: In total, 271 HRM data were analyzed, of which 90.4% showed abnormal results. HRM was well tolerated in 91% of the cases. The most common esophageal motility disorder was ineffective esophageal motility (38%). Weight loss was significantly associated (P = 0.003) with an abnormal HRM with a 96% PPV. CONCLUSIONS: With nonspecific clinical signs suggesting an esophageal motility disorder, weight loss was a predictive sign of abnormal HRM results. HRM was well tolerated in pediatric patients, and ineffective esophageal motility appears to be the most frequent motility disorder in our cohort, as already observed in adult patient studies.