Shift in Sympathovagal Balance Toward Parasympathetic Predominance Is Associated With Attenuation of Portal Hyperperfusion in Cirrhotic Recipients Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: The autonomic innervation to a liver graft remains lost up to 1 year after liver transplant. Therefore, we investigated the effects of recipients' autonomic nervous activity on the extent of portal hyperperfusion of a partial liver graft in the absence of the autonomic innervation. METHODS: A total of 31 cirrhotic recipients undergoing right lobe living donor liver transplant were analyzed. Following a 10-minute absence of surgical stimulation after hepatic artery and bile duct reconstruction, the electrocardiogram and blood pressure waveforms were recorded for 5 minutes. Low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) powers and their ratio (LF/HF) were calculated using fast Fourier transform from the electrocardiogram waveform. A decrease in LF/HF represents a shift in sympathovagal balance toward parasympathetic predominance. Then, portal venous (PVF) and hepatic arterial (HAF) blood flows were measured in mL/min per 100 g of liver weight using spectral Doppler ultrasonography. A decrease in their ratio (PVF/HAF) represents attenuation of portal hyperperfusion. RESULTS: The medians of the PVF and HAF were 349 and 27 mL/min/100 g liver weight with interquartile ranges of 272 to 617 mL/min/100 g liver weight and 22 to 41 mL/min/100 g liver weight, respectively, yielding a median of the PVF/HAF of 13.7 (interquartile range, 8.5-21.3). The median of LF/HF was 0.67 (interquartile range, 0.16-1.45). With a reduction in LF/HF, PVF/HAF decreased according to an S-curve regression model between them (PVF/HAF=e2.743+-0.031LF/HF,adjustedR2=0.129,P=0.027). CONCLUSION: A shift in sympathovagal balance toward parasympathetic predominance is associated with attenuation of portal hyperperfusion in a partial liver graft.

Dual-graft adult living donor liver transplantation with ABO-incompatible graft: short-term and long-term outcomes.

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) dual-graft (DG) adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is not commonly performed due to its inherently intricate surgical technique and immunological complexity. Therefore, data are lacking on the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of ABOi DG ALDLT. We performed a retrospective study by reviewing the medical records of patients who underwent ABOi DG ALDLT between 2008 and 2014. Additionally, computed tomography volumetric analysis was conducted to assess the graft regeneration rate. The mean age of a total of 28 recipients was 50.2 ± 8.5 years, and the mean model for end-stage liver disease score was 12.2 ± 4.6. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rate was 96.4% during the mean follow-up period of 57.0 ± 22.4 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rate was 96.4%, 94.2%, and 92.0%, respectively, and no significant differences were observed between ABO-compatible (ABOc) and ABOi grafts (P = .145). The biliary complication rate showed no significant difference (P = .195) between ABOc and ABOi grafts. Regeneration rates of ABOi grafts were not significantly different from those of ABOc grafts. DG ALDLT with ABOi and ABOc graft combination seems to be a feasible option for expanding the donor pool without additional donor risks.

Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in High-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Patients.

The large volume of adult living donor liver transplantations (ALDLTs) at our center affords a unique opportunity to examine the impact of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) among high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease MELD score patients. From February 1998 to March 2010, 1958 cirrhotic recipients were analyzed to study the relationship between MELD scores and ALDLT outcomes. A total of 327 high-MELD score recipients were categorized into ACLF and non-ACLF groups, and their outcomes were compared. The 5-year graft and patient survival in the high-MELD group were 75.2% and 76.4%, respectively, which were significantly worse than the low and intermediate MELD groups. The presence of ACLF associated with higher MELD scores appeared to be the dominant factor responsible for the inferior results of patients with MELD score of 30-34 points. The 5-year graft survivals in the ACLF group was 70.5% and in the non-ACLF group it was 81.0% (p = 0.035). Therefore, ALDLT should be performed as soon as possible in high-MELD score patients prior to ACLF development. Moreover, ACLF patients should be separately categorized when analyzing the outcomes of ALDLT. ALDLT for ACLF patients should not be discouraged because favorable outcomes can be expected through timely ALDLT and comprehensive management.

Acute Graft-vs-Host Disease After Liver Transplantation: Experience at a High-volume Liver Transplantation Center in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a rare but life-threatening complication of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We present 6 cases of GVHD after OLT. METHODS: Among our 4294 OLT recipients, we identified 6 patients (0.14%) who were diagnosed with GVHD. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Liver graft types included deceased donor whole liver graft (n = 3) and right liver graft from son (n = 3). Mean recipient and donor ages were 57.2 ± 6.6 years and 32.7 ± 10.8 years, respectively. Onset of GVHD symptoms occurred 14 to 32 days after OLT, and initial symptoms were skin rash (n = 5) and fever (n = 1). GVHD was pathologically confirmed by skin or rectal biopsy. Chimerism of donor lymphocytes was identified in all 3 patients who underwent the short tandem repeat polymerase chain reaction assay. Attempts were made to treat the GVHD in all 6 patients by corticosteroids with or without low-dose calcineurin inhibitor, but we had to stop early or reduce these agents due to aggravation of pancytopenia and septic complications. Ultimately, 5 patients died 6 to 106 days after the onset of GVHD, and only 1 patient recovered. This surviving patient was diagnosed earlier and had been administered the recommended dosage of corticosteroid for a longer period with aggressive infection prophylaxis compared to the other cases. CONCLUSIONS: Because of very poor outcomes of GVHD after OLT, early diagnosis and vigorous treatment should be emphasized, although no effective treatment modality has been established yet. We strongly suggest performing aggressive infection prophylaxis during GVHD treatment.