Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Euro Surveill ; 27(41)2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36239171

ABSTRACT

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries implemented a wide set of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), sometimes with limited knowledge on their effect and impact on population. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) developed a Response Measures Database (ECDC-JRC RMD) to archive NPIs in 30 EU/EEA countries from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2022. We aimed to introduce a tool for the wider scientific community to assess COVID-19 NPIs effect and impact in the EU/EEA. We give an overview of the ECDC-JRC RMD rationale and structure, including a brief analysis of the main NPIs applied in 2020, before the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. The ECDC-JRC RMD organises NPIs through a three-level hierarchical structure and uses four additional parameters ('status', 'implementation', 'target group' and 'geographical representation') to provide further information on the implementation of each measure. Features including the ready-for-analysis, downloadable format and its agile taxonomy and structure highlight the potential of the ECDC-JRC RMD to facilitate further NPI analysis and optimise decision making on public health response policies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Europe/epidemiology , European Union , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control
2.
Euro Surveill ; 27(7)2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35177166

ABSTRACT

Despite high COVID-19 vaccine coverage in the EU/EEA, there are increasing reports of SARS-CoV-2 infections and hospitalisations in vaccinated individuals. Using surveillance data from Estonia, Ireland, Luxembourg and Slovakia (January-November 2021), we estimated risk reduction of severe outcomes in vaccinated cases. Increasing age remains the most important driver of severity, and vaccination significantly reduces risk in all ages for hospitalisation (adjusted relative risk (aRR): 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.39) and death (aRR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.13-0.29).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Estonia/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Luxembourg , Risk Reduction Behavior , SARS-CoV-2 , Slovakia/epidemiology
3.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 169(Suppl 1): 3-5, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30680486

ABSTRACT

Point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antimicrobial use in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA) from 2016 to 2017 included 310,755 patients from 1,209 acute care hospitals in 28 countries. After national validation, we estimated that 6.5% (cumulative 95% confidence interval (cCI): 5.4-7.8%) patients in acute care hospitals had at least one HAI (country-weighted prevalence). On any given day, 98,166 patients (95% cCI: 81,022-117,484) in acute care hospitals had an HAI; 3.8 million (95% cCI: 3.1-4.5 million) patients acquired an HAI each year. Our study confirmed a high annual number of HAI in healthcare facilities in the EU/EEA.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Europe , Humans , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Euro Surveill ; 23(46)2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30458912

ABSTRACT

Point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antimicrobial use in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA) from 2016 to 2017 included 310,755 patients from 1,209 acute care hospitals (ACH) in 28 countries and 117,138 residents from 2,221 long-term care facilities (LTCF) in 23 countries. After national validation, we estimated that 6.5% (cumulative 95% confidence interval (cCI): 5.4-7.8%) patients in ACH and 3.9% (95% cCI: 2.4-6.0%) residents in LTCF had at least one HAI (country-weighted prevalence). On any given day, 98,166 patients (95% cCI: 81,022-117,484) in ACH and 129,940 (95% cCI: 79,570-197,625) residents in LTCF had an HAI. HAI episodes per year were estimated at 8.9 million (95% cCI: 4.6-15.6 million), including 4.5 million (95% cCI: 2.6-7.6 million) in ACH and 4.4 million (95% cCI: 2.0-8.0 million) in LTCF; 3.8 million (95% cCI: 3.1-4.5 million) patients acquired an HAI each year in ACH. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to selected AMR markers was 31.6% in ACH and 28.0% in LTCF. Our study confirmed a high annual number of HAI in healthcare facilities in the EU/EEA and indicated that AMR in HAI in LTCF may have reached the same level as in ACH.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Cross Infection/microbiology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Long-Term Care , Male , Prevalence
5.
Euro Surveill ; 23(46)2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30458913

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobials are commonly prescribed and contribute to the development of antimicrobial resistance in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). In 2010, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control initiated point prevalence surveys (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European LTCFs, performed by external contractors as the Healthcare-Associated infections in Long-Term care facilities (HALT) projects. Here, we investigated prevalence and characteristics of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial stewardship indicators in European LTCFs in 2016-17. Twenty-four European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia participated in the third PPS in European LTCFs. Overall, 4.9% (95% confidence interval: 4.8-5.1) of LTCF residents in the EU/EEA participating countries received at least one antimicrobial. The most commonly reported Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups were beta-lactam antibacterials/penicillins (J01C), other antibacterials (J01X) (e.g. glycopeptide antibacterials, polymyxins), quinolones (J01M), sulfonamides and trimethoprim (J01E), and other beta-lactams (J01D). Urinary tract infections and respiratory tract infections were the main indications for antimicrobial prescription. This PPS provides updated and detailed information on antimicrobial use in LTCFs across the EU/EEA that can be used to identify targets for future interventions, follow-up of these interventions and promote prudent use of antimicrobials in European LTCFs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Health Care Surveys , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Euro Surveill ; 23(46)2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30458917

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial agents used to treat infections are life-saving. Overuse may result in more frequent adverse effects and emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms. In 2016-17, we performed the second point-prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals. We included 1,209 hospitals and 310,755 patients in 28 of 31 European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries. The weighted prevalence of antimicrobial use in the EU/EEA was 30.5% (95% CI: 29.2-31.9%). The most common indication for prescribing antimicrobials was treatment of a community-acquired infection, followed by treatment of HAI and surgical prophylaxis. Over half (54.2%) of antimicrobials for surgical prophylaxis were prescribed for more than 1 day. The most common infections treated by antimicrobials were respiratory tract infections and the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents were penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors. There was wide variation of patients on antimicrobials, in the selection of antimicrobial agents and in antimicrobial stewardship resources and activities across the participating countries. The results of the PPS provide detailed information on antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals, enable comparisons between countries and hospitals, and highlight key areas for national and European action that will support efforts towards prudent use of antimicrobials.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
7.
Euro Surveill ; 23(32)2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30107871

ABSTRACT

An aim of the ECDC point prevalence survey (PPS) in European Union/European Economic Area acute care hospitals was to acquire standardised healthcare-associated infections (HAI) data. We analysed one of the most common HAIs in the ECDC PPS, healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP). Standardised HAI case definitions were provided and countries were advised to recruit nationally representative subsets of hospitals. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around prevalence estimates and adjusted for clustering at hospital level. Of 231,459 patients in the survey, 2,902 (1.3%; 95% CI: 1.2-1.3) fulfilled the case definition for a HAP. HAPs were most frequent in intensive care units (8.1%; 95% CI: 7.4-8.9) and among patients intubated on the day of the survey (15%; 95% CI: 14-17; n = 737 with HAP). The most frequently reported microorganism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17% of 1,403 isolates), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (12%) and Klebsiella spp. (12%). Antimicrobial resistance was common among isolated microorganisms. The most frequently prescribed antimicrobial group was penicillins, including combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors. HAPs occur regularly among intubated and non-intubated patients, with marked differences between medical specialities. HAPs remain a priority for preventive interventions, including surveillance. Our data provide a reference for future prevalence of HAPs at various settings.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Europe/epidemiology , European Union , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/drug therapy , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Inpatients , Intensive Care Units , Klebsiella/drug effects , Klebsiella/isolation & purification , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Young Adult
8.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 13(9): 490-4, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27455195

ABSTRACT

Campylobacter spp. is the most common gastrointestinal pathogen worldwide with a very low reported incidence in Italy. In November of 2013, local and national public health authorities investigated an outbreak caused by Campylobacter jejuni among children in a kindergarten in Northern Italy. A case was defined as a child who had diarrhea with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of C. jejuni between 11 and 30 November. Stool samples from the kindergarten kitchen staff and environmental samples from the kitchen were examined for enteric pathogens. As food leftovers were not available, the menu logbook of the refectory was reviewed to identify a possible source of the outbreak. C. jejuni strains were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and subtyped by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). We identified 20 cases among 247 schoolchildren (attack rate = 8%), all who reported having lunch in the kindergarten. The stools from the kitchen staff as well as the environmental samples were negative for enteric pathogens. The identified outbreak strains (n = 5) were sensitive to all of the antimicrobials tested; the first four strains showed an identical PFGE profile, whereas the fifth strain showed a PFGE pattern similarity of 89%. Using MLST, all five strains were assigned to a single sequence type (ST), ST451 (clonal complex, CC21); this was the first identification of ST and the third reported outbreak of C. jejuni in Italy. Molecular typing confirmed that most of the cases belonged to a clonal cluster supporting the hypothesis of a common source; however, the source was not identified. Due to a delayed start of the investigation, it was not possible to perform any microbiological evaluation of the food consumed.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Campylobacter jejuni/classification , Campylobacter jejuni/genetics , Child, Preschool , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Feces/microbiology , Female , Genotype , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Molecular Epidemiology , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Schools
9.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 48(3): 229-34, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26577519

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few systematically collected multi-centre surveillance data on nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae have been published. AIM: To evaluate trends, patient characteristics and mortality of such infections, nosocomial BSI data reported by the 4-17 hospitals participating in the prospective laboratory-based surveillance during 1999-2013 were analysed. METHODS: Data were collected by local infection control nurses, patient-days were obtained from the hospital's administrative database, and dates of deaths from the population registry. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins was further examined in the national reference laboratory. FINDINGS: A total of 16 028 nosocomial BSIs were identified; 2217 (14%) were caused by E. coli and 661 (4%) by K. pneumoniae; 207 (7%) were non-susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins, with an increasing trend from 0% in 1999 to 17% in 2013. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between BSIs caused by third-generation susceptible and resistant E. coli and K. pneumonia, but the case fatality tended to be higher. Most (88%) of the isolates reported as non-susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins had ESBL phenotype, CTX-M (79%) being the most common enzyme. CONCLUSION: A sharp increase in nosocomial BSIs caused by ESBL producing bacteria was observed. Identification of patients for screening pose a challenge, emphasising the role of infection control guidelines and antibiotic policy in prevention.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Cephalosporin Resistance , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/mortality , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/mortality , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/mortality , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/mortality , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis
10.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 12(12): 15550-8, 2015 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670237

ABSTRACT

Changing migration dynamics in the Mediterranean Sea and differences in infectious diseases (ID) burden between the countries of origin have raised questions whether public health actions are needed to avoid the transmission of ID. Screening newly arrived migrants for ID is one health monitoring option, offering opportunities for prevention, early detection and treatment. The authors conducted a survey among country experts in non-European Union countries of the Mediterranean and Black Sea, in order to explore current ID screening practices and policies for newly arrived migrants. The association between the existence of guidelines and the proportion of refugees in the population was also estimated. Eighteen country experts responded (90%) out of the 20 invited. Eleven countries (61%) implemented screening programmes and six (38%) had national guidelines. Screening was performed most often for tuberculosis at the holding level. A higher proportion of refugees in the population was associated with the existence of guidelines for screening (p = 0.05). Fourteen experts (88%) considered screening among migrants useful. The results show that screening for ID in newly arrived migrants is relevant for non-EU countries of the Mediterranean and Black Sea. Common guidelines could be promoted focusing on both individual and public health benefits of screening programmes.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Emigrants and Immigrants , Mass Screening/methods , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Refugees , Black Sea , Europe , Humans , Mediterranean Sea , Practice Guidelines as Topic
11.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 12(9): 11640-61, 2015 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26393623

ABSTRACT

There are limitations in our capacity to interpret point estimates and trends of infectious diseases occurring among diverse migrant populations living in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA). The aim of this study was to design a data collection framework that could capture information on factors associated with increased risk to infectious diseases in migrant populations in the EU/EEA. The authors defined factors associated with increased risk according to a multi-dimensional framework and performed a systematic literature review in order to identify whether those factors well reflected the reported risk factors for infectious disease in these populations. Following this, the feasibility of applying this framework to relevant available EU/EEA data sources was assessed. The proposed multidimensional framework is well suited to capture the complexity and concurrence of these risk factors and in principle applicable in the EU/EEA. The authors conclude that adopting a multi-dimensional framework to monitor infectious diseases could favor the disaggregated collection and analysis of migrant health data.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Data Collection , Ethnicity , European Union , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Risk Factors , White People
13.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 56(12): 3370-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25813080

ABSTRACT

This retrospectively collected laboratory-based surveillance data includes 575 healthcare-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) in 350 patients with hematological malignancy in Tampere University Hospital, Finland, during 1999-2001 and 2005-2010. The most common underlying diseases were acute myelogenous leukemia (n=283, 49%), followed by myeloma (n=87, 15%) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (n=76, 13%). The overall rate was 9.1 BSIs per 1000 patient-days. Gram-positive BSIs predominated and the most common pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (23%), viridans streptococci (11%), enterococci (9%) and Escherichia coli (9%). Fungi caused 2% of BSIs. The 7-day and 28-day case fatalities were 5% and 10% and were highest in BSIs caused by P. aeruginosa (19% and 34%, respectively). The median age of patients with BSI has increased; it was 55.0 years during 1999-2001, compared to 59.0 years in 2005-2007 and 59.0 years in 2008-2010 (p<0.0001). Gram-positive bacteria predominated in this material. Case fatalities were low as compared to previous reports although the median age of patients increased.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/etiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Management , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Public Health Surveillance , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/therapy , Young Adult
14.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 47(1): 20-6, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351869

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections are major causes of morbidity in hospitalized patients. METHODS: Retrospective laboratory-based surveillance during 1999-2001 and 2005-2010 identified 2175 cases of nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSIs) in Tampere University Hospital (TAUH), Finland. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that 57% of BSIs were caused by a gram-positive organism, 27% by a gram-negative organism, 5% by a fungal organism, and 11% were polymicrobial. The most common cause of nosocomial BSI was coagulase-negative staphylococci (23%). Candida species caused 5% of the infections. The 7-day and 30-day case fatalities were 8% (161/2158) and 15% (313/2175), respectively, and were highest in BSIs caused by Candida albicans (22% and 44%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17% and 25%). The median age of patients was 54 years in 1999-2001, 57 years in 2005-2007, and 60 years in 2008-2010 (p < 0.001). The median time from hospital admission to the onset of BSI was 11 days (quartiles 5-18 days). This period was shortest for Streptococcus agalactiae BSI and longest for Candida non-albicans fungemia (1 vs 19 days). The case fatality rate in nosocomial BSI decreased during the years studied: 7-day and 30-day case fatalities were 9% and 16% during 1999-2001, 8.5% and 16% during 2005-2007, and 5% and 12% during 2008-2010, respectively (p < 0.003 and p = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Gram-positive infections predominate in nosocomial BSIs. The median age of patients with nosocomial BSI has risen during the study years. The case fatality associated with nosocomial BSI has decreased.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/mortality , Cross Infection/mortality , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
15.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 11(10): 11004-14, 2014 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25337945

ABSTRACT

Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We conducted a survey among country experts from EU/EEA countries and Switzerland, asking whether their countries had implemented screening programmes. We also estimated the association between the implementation of these programmes and the rate of asylum-seekers in the population. Of the countries, 16 (59%) had implemented screening programmes and 15 (56%) had national guidelines. The rate of asylum-seekers was associated with implementation of screening programmes (p = 0.014). Screening was performed most often for tuberculosis; most commonly on holding level, and was targeted to specific migrant groups in over half of the countries performing screening. Twenty-five of all the country experts (96%) considered screening among migrants useful, and 24 (92%) would welcome EU level guidelines for screening. The implementation of screening programmes varied, and the practices were different among countries. Our survey suggests, that establishing EU level guidelines for screening would be useful, although they would have to take into account differences between individual countries.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Transients and Migrants , Data Collection , Europe , European Union , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Refugees , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...