Technical modifications for improving the success rate of PEG tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) benefit from nutritional support by means of PEG tubes, but endoscopy may be impossible when there is partial or complete trismus and/or stenosis or occlusion of the upper aerodigestive tract. METHODS: PEG tubes were placed in 277 patients with HNC. Oral insertion of an endoscope into the esophagus was impossible in 27 patients. Transnasal endoscopy was performed (n = 4). In the cases of high-grade tumor obstruction, the endoscope was introduced into the esophagus through a straight laryngoscope (n = 9). When upper aerodigestive tract occlusion was present, endoscopy with PEG placement was successfully performed during surgery by means of the opened pharynx after tumor resection (n = 12). RESULTS: In 25 of the 27 cases PEG tubes could be placed by using the above alternative techniques. There were no immediate complications, and no complications occurred within 30 days of PEG placement. CONCLUSIONS: Transnasal, straight laryngoscopic, or intraoperative open endoscopy can improve the success rate for PEG tube placement in patients with HNC.

[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: experience of three years]. / Percutan endoscopos gastrostomia: 3 év tapasztalatai.

UNLABELLED: Patients who are not able to eat do need tube feeding. The most preferred way of artificial enteral nutritional support is feeding via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. Head and neck cancer patients do represent a special group of patients needing a PEG. On the one hand at the time of admission to the hospital they are mainly undernourished. On the other hand the failure rate of placing a PEG is the highest among them. Furthermore in the perioperative period nasogastric tubes do cause a lot of complications in these settings. 188 PEG placements were carried out from July 1995 till November 1998. INDICATIONS: head and neck cancer (n = 171), neurologic disorders (n = 17). PEG tubes were placed 76 times during intratracheal narcosis and 112 times following local anaesthesia. 39 times there was a prior abdominal surgery in our patients medical history. The pull-through, the push-wire and the introducer techniques were used. Beside the usual oro-gastric way of endoscopying (n = 163), 25 times the following alternative ways of entering the upper gastrointestinal tract were used: transnasal route (n = 4), through a Kleinsasser type direct laryngoscope (n = 7) and via the opened pharynx (n = 14). No immediate or late onset procedure related complications occurred. During a follow-up of 22,480 tubedays 26 minor (dermatitis n = 24, ulcer n = 2) and 8 major (abscess n = 4, perforation/peritonitis n = 3, stomach and bowel wall necrosis n = 1) complications occurred. The success rate of placing a PEG was 98.9%. In head and neck cancer patients placing a PEG is suggested when there is a need for at least a 7 days time tube-feeding. Using the described alternative ways, a PEG tube can be placed almost always. Because of the uncertain outcome, nutritional support via PEG tubes is suggested also in cachectic patients and in vegetative state as well.