Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Oncol ; 19(1): 49, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627747

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates various craniospinal irradiation (CSI) techniques used in Turkish centers to understand their advantages, disadvantages and overall effectiveness, with a focus on enhancing dose distribution. METHODS: Anonymized CT scans of adult and pediatric patients, alongside target volumes and organ-at-risk (OAR) structures, were shared with 25 local radiotherapy centers. They were tasked to develop optimal treatment plans delivering 36 Gy in 20 fractions with 95% PTV coverage, while minimizing OAR exposure. The same CT data was sent to a US proton therapy center for comparison. Various planning systems and treatment techniques (3D conformal RT, IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy) were utilized. Elekta Proknow software was used to analyze parameters, assess dose distributions, mean doses, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for both target volumes and OARs. Comparisons were made against proton therapy. RESULTS: All techniques consistently achieved excellent PTV coverage (V95 > 98%) for both adult and pediatric patients. Tomotherapy closely approached ideal Dmean doses for all PTVs, while 3D-CRT had higher Dmean for PTV_brain. Tomotherapy excelled in CI and HI for PTVs. IMRT resulted in lower pediatric heart, kidney, parotid, and eye doses, while 3D-CRT achieved the lowest adult lung doses. Tomotherapy approached proton therapy doses for adult kidneys and thyroid, while IMRT excelled for adult heart, kidney, parotid, esophagus, and eyes. CONCLUSION: Modern radiotherapy techniques offer improved target coverage and OAR protection. However, 3D techniques are continued to be used for CSI. Notably, proton therapy stands out as the most efficient approach, closely followed by Tomotherapy in terms of achieving superior target coverage and OAR protection.


Subject(s)
Craniospinal Irradiation , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Adult , Humans , Child , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Craniospinal Irradiation/methods , Turkey , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
2.
Med Dosim ; 46(2): 136-142, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33127293

ABSTRACT

The present study was undertaken to investigate the suitability of alternative internal target volume (ITV) delineation strategies based on maximum intensity projection (MIP), average intensity projection (AIP), 2 extreme phases and 4 phases images relative to the ITV10phase in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer. The 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) data of 15 lung cancer patients treated with SBRT in our clinic were used. Five different ITVs were generated as follows: merging GTVs from 10 phases (ITV10Phase); merging GTVs from 2 extreme phases (0%, 50%) (ITV2Phase); merging GTVs from 4 phases (0%, 20%, 50%, and 70%) (ITV4Phase); delineating GTV on MIP (ITVMIP), and delineating GTV on AIP (ITVAIP). PTV10Phase, PTV2Phase, PTV4Phase, PTVMIP, and PTVAIP were generated by adding a 5-mm margin around the related ITV. Volumetric analyses were performed for 4 ITVs and PTVs relative to ITV10phase and PTV10phase. SBRT plans made for all PTVs were evaluated for dosimetric effect of alternative ITV delineation strategies. The mean percentage overlap volume (POV) for PTV2phase, PTV4phase, PTVMIP, and PTVAIP relative to PTV10phase were 84.2 ± 5.4%, 92.0 ± 2.9%, 82.2 ± 5.7%, and 73.8 ± 9.3%, for lower-lobe tumors, respectively. The mean POV for PTV2phase, PTV4phase, PTVMIP, and PTVAIP relative to PTV10phase were 93.2 ± 2.5%, 95.9 ± 1.0%, 87.5 ± 6.7%, and 83.3 ± 6.8% for upper-lobe, respectively. For lower-lobe tumors the mean differences in V20 and MLD for plans based on PTV2phase and PTV4phase were <0.5% and <10 cGy, compared with a plan based on PTV10phase. The use of PTV based on 4 respiratory phases and a 5-mm margin is a safe approach to reduce the workload of target delineation for tumors located in both lower and upper lobes.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
3.
J Xray Sci Technol ; 27(2): 361-369, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30856153

ABSTRACT

In radiotherapy, dose distributions are obtained by using dose calculation algorithms that are implanted in treatment planning systems (TPS). This study aims to compare the surface doses of separate field sizes calculated by different version of The Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and measured by the parallel-plate ion chamber that is admitted as the most reliable dosimetry system for the surface region dose measurements. In order to measure the near surface dose, water equivalent solid phantom was used and measurements were made for 6MV photon beam at 100 cm source-detector distance for 5×5, 10×10, and 20×20 cm2 field sizes. AAA 8.9 and AAA 15.1 versions of the Varian Eclipse TPS were used for surface dose calculations by generating beams with separate field sizes. The doses were read by considering the effective buildup thickness of Markus parallel-plate ion chamber. The surface doses using 6 MV photon beams for 10×10 cm2 field size at 0.07 mm were found to be 11.04%, 26.25%, and 19.69% for AAA v8.9, AAA v15.1 and Markus chamber, respectively. It was seen that for both of the AAA versions and Markus parallel-plate ion chamber, increasing field sizes also increase surface dose. For all field sizes, surface dose was lowest by using AAA v8.9 at 0.07 mm. The different versions of the same TPS algorithms may calculate the surface doses distinctively. After upgrading of TPS algorithms, surface doses should be calculated and compared by measurements with different dosimetry systems to better understand their calculation behaviors in the near surface region.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Anisotropy , Phantoms, Imaging , Photons , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
4.
Med Dosim ; 44(3): 251-257, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30366620

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the Hybrid technique which was created by combining of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients. 7 to 9 field IMRT, triple arc VMAT, and Hybrid plans were generated for 10 advanced stage NPC patients. The homogeneity index (HI) and the conformity index (CI) of planning target volumes (PTVs) were calculated for each technique to evaluate the plan quality. The techniques were compared in terms of plan quality, sparing of organs at risk (OARs), monitor units (MUs), and delivery time. Hybrid technique significantly improved the target dose homogeneity and the conformity for PTV70 and PTV60 compared to IMRT and VMAT. Hybrid plans significantly reduced the maximum dose of the brainstem sparing compared to the VMAT plans and also improved the sparing of spinal cord compared to IMRT and VMAT. The MUs and the delivery time of Hybrid plans were found to be between values for IMRT and VMAT plans. Hybrid technique can be useful when IMRT and VMAT techniques are not adequate alone in the treatment of NPC patients.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Humans , Organs at Risk , Radiotherapy Dosage
5.
J BUON ; 23(1): 179-184, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29552780

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for intracranial irradiation using CyberKnife with an ion chamber. METHODS: Twenty-five intracranial plans created using the ray-tracing algorithm were used for this study. Computed tomography (CT) images of the water-equivalent RW3 slab phantom with PinPoint ionization chamber were acquired with 1-mm slice thickness and transferred to the MultiPlan treatment planning system (TPS). Four gold fiducial markers embedded into two different plates were used to tracking during the irradiation. Intracranial plans were transferred to CT images of the RW3 phantom. The isodose curves and sensitive volume of ion chamber were overlapped. Point dose measurements were performed three times and the mean point doses were calculated for each plan. The mean doses measured by the PinPoint ion chamber were compared with those of the calculated by MultiPlan TPS in the sensitive volume of PinPoint. RESULTS: The mean percentage difference (MPD) in point dose measurements was -2.44±1.97 for 25 plans. The maximum and minimum percentage differences between the measured and calculated absolute point doses were -7.14 and 0.23, respectively. The MPD was -1.70±1.90 for 12 plans using a fixed collimator and -3.11±1.86 for 13 plans using an IRIS cone. CONCLUSIONS: Point dose measurement is a reliable and functional method for pre-treatment patient-specific QA in intracranial CyberKnife plans. Point dose verification should be performed to correct any possible errors prior to patient treatment. It is recommended for use in patient-specific QA process in the CyberKnife plans.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Brain Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
6.
J Med Phys ; 42(3): 128-132, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974857

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the factors that reduce fetal dose in pregnant patients with breast cancer throughout their radiation treatment. Two main factors in a standard radiation oncology center are considered as the treatment planning systems (TPSs) and simple shielding for intensity modulated radiation therapy technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TPS factor was evaluated with two different planning algorithms: Anisotropic analytical algorithm and Acuros XB (external beam). To evaluate the shielding factor, a standard radiological purpose lead apron was chosen. For both studies, thermoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the point dose, and an Alderson RANDO-phantom was used to simulate a female pregnant patient in this study. Thirteen measurement points were chosen in the 32nd slice of the phantom to cover all possible locations of a fetus up to 8th week of gestation. RESULTS: The results show that both of the TPS algorithms are incapable of calculating the fetal doses, therefore, unable to reduce them at the planning stage. Shielding with a standard lead apron, however, showed a slight radiation protection (about 4.7%) to the fetus decreasing the mean fetal dose from 84.8 mGy to 80.8 mGy, which cannot be disregarded in case of fetal irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Using a lead apron for shielding the abdominal region of a pregnant patient during breast irradiation showed a minor advantage; however, its possible side effects (i.e., increased scattered radiation and skin dose) should also be investigated further to solidify its benefits.

7.
Med Dosim ; 41(2): 95-9, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26831923

ABSTRACT

The aim of this research was to investigate the fetal doses of pregnant patients undergoing conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for breast cancers. An Alderson Rando phantom was chosen to simulate a pregnant patient with breast cancer who is receiving radiation therapy. This phantom was irradiated using the Varian Clinac DBX 600 system (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA) linear accelerator, according to the standard treatment plans of both three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3-D CRT) and IMRT techniques. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure the irradiated phantom׳s virtually designated uterus area. Thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements (in the phantom) revealed that the mean cumulative fetal dose for 3-D CRT is 1.39cGy and for IMRT it is 8.48cGy, for a pregnant breast cancer woman who received radiation treatment of 50Gy. The fetal dose was confirmed to increase by 70% for 3-D CRT and 40% for IMRT, if it is closer to the irradiated field by 5cm. The mean fetal dose from 3-D CRT is 1.39cGy and IMRT is 8.48cGy, consistent with theoretic calculations. The IMRT technique causes the fetal dose to be 5 times more than that of 3-D CRT. Theoretic knowledge concerning the increase in the peripheral doses as the measurements approached the beam was also practically proven.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Fetus/radiation effects , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Female , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Pregnancy , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...