Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 53(6): 321-327, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31187676

ABSTRACT

Comparing complication rates between centres is difficult due to the lack of unanimous criteria regarding what adverse events should be defined as complications and how these events should be compiled. This study analysed all adverse events in a cohort of craniofacial (CF) operations over a 10-year period and applied three different scales (Clavien-Dindo, Leeds and Oxford) for systematic comparison. A total of 1023 consecutive CF procedures in 641 patients was identified. The Clavien-Dindo scale captured 74 complications in 74 procedures (7.2%), whereas the Leeds and Oxford scales captured 163 complications in 134 procedures (13.1%) and 85 complications in 83 procedures (8.1%), respectively. The Clavien-Dindo scale appeared less suitable for CF surgery, because it is predominantly adapted to severe complications and also regards blood transfusion as a complication. The Leeds scale provided a detailed picture of all complications, as well as minor events, whereas the Oxford scale captured all major complications well but applied less accurate definitions for the minor events. Our findings contribute to the benchmarking of complications between CF centres and suggest that both the Leeds and the Oxford scale appear relevant, depending on the emphasis required for major and minor complications and inter-centre audits, respectively.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Oral Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/classification , Cohort Studies , Humans
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 28(3): 650-653, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28468142

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Spring-assisted cranioplasty to correct sagittal synostosis is based on midline craniotomy through the closed sagittal suture, over the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perioperative safety of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients operated with median craniotomy and springs from 1998 to the end of 2015. For comparison, all Pi-plasties performed during the same time interval were also evaluated. The safety measures were evaluated based on incidence of damage to SSS, incidence of dural tears, perioperative blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay. RESULTS: In the group that had undergone midline craniotomy combined with springs (n = 225), 4 perioperative damages to SSS and 1 dural tear were seen. The perioperative blood loss was 62.8 ±â€Š65.3 mL (mean ±â€Šstandard deviation). The operative time was 67.9 ±â€Š21.5 minutes and the hospital stay was 4.8 ±â€Š1.1 days. In the group that had undergone pi-plasty (n = 105), no damages to SSS but 3 dural tears were seen. The perioperative blood loss was 352.8 ±â€Š174.4 mL. The operative time was 126.0 ±â€Š31.7 minutes and the hospital stay was 7.1 ±â€Š1.4 days. CONCLUSION: Craniotomy SSS in sagittal synostosis is a safe procedure with low morbidity in terms of damage to the SSS. Midline craniotomy combined with springs has significantly lower preoperative blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay (P < 0.001 for all) compared to pi-plasty.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Craniotomy/methods , Superior Sagittal Sinus/surgery , Cranial Sutures/surgery , Dura Mater/injuries , Female , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Male , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Superior Sagittal Sinus/injuries , Sutures
3.
Int J Clin Exp Pathol ; 8(8): 9672-80, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26464736

ABSTRACT

Intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas are classified as intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMNs) in the current WHO classification. ITPN is a rare tumor and there are only a few cases of ITPN reported in the literature. We present the case of an otherwise healthy 42-year-old male, who presented with upper abdominal pain. He was subsequently diagnosed with multifocal ITPN and underwent total pancreatectomy. The pathological report showed invasive growth. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient received 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine-capecitabine. The patient is still alive 19 months after the procedure with no signs of recurrence. Literature review revealed only 30 individual cases of ITPN in the pancreas including our reported case. Mean age was 61 years (16 males/14 females; ratio 1.14:1). Mean tumor size was 3 cm. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CK-7 in 100% of the patients, CK-19 in 95% and for MUC-1 in 88%. Trypsin was negative in all cases. ß-catenin was negative in 94% and MUC-2 was negative in 96% of the cases. BRAF, KRAS, TP53 and PIK3CA mutations were infrequently seen. Invasive growth was present in 54% of the cases. Tumor size and Ki-67 index showed a statistically significant association with invasive growth. Survival rate could not be determined, due to short follow-up, and further research is needed to establish prognostic factors for disease recurrence and survival.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Pancreatic Ducts/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Capecitabine/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Papillary/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Male , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Gemcitabine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...