Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Fusion Surgery in L5/S1 - What Is the Best Way to Restore a physiological Alignment?

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single center cohort study with prospective collected data from an institutional spine registry. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether restoration of lordosis L5/S1 is possible with both anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to find out which technique is superior to recreate lordosis in L5/S1. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with ALIF and seventy-nine with TLIF L5/S1 were included. Operation time, estimated blood loss), and complications were evaluated. Segmental lordosis L5/S1 and L4/5, overall lordosis, and proximal lordosis (L1 to L4) were measured in X-rays before and after surgery. Oswesery disability index and EQ-5D were assessed before surgery, and 3 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Mean operation time was 176.9 minutes for ALIF and 195.7 minutes for TLIF (p = 0.048). Estimated blood loss was 249.2 cc for ALIF and 362.9 cc for TLIF (p = 0.005). In terms of complications, only a difference in dural tears were found (TLIF 6, ALIF none; p = 0.014). Lordosis L5/S1 increased in the ALIF group (15.8 to 24.6°; p < 0.001), whereas no difference was noted in the TLIF group (18.4 to 19.4°; p = 0.360). Clinical results showed significant improvement in the Oswesery disability index (ALIF: 43 to 21.9, TLIF: 45.2 to 23.0) and EQ-5D (ALIF: 0.494 to 0.732, TLIF: 0.393 to 0.764) after 12 months in both groups, without differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: ALIF and TLIF are comparable methods for performing fusion at L5/S1, with good clinical outcomes and comparable rates of complications. However, there is only a limited potential for recreating lordosis at L5/S1 with a TLIF.

Intraoperative Radiation Exposure for Patients with Double-Curve Idiopathic Scoliosis in Freehand-Technique in Comparison to Fluoroscopic- and CT-Based Navigation. / Intraoperative Strahlenbelastung für Patienten mit doppelbogiger idiopathischer Skoliose in Freihandtechnik im Vergleich zu fluoroskopisch und CT-gestützter Navigation.

BACKGROUND: In the operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, posterior correction and fusion in freehand technique is a proven procedure and is frequently performed. Malpositioned pedicle screws can result in serious neurovascular complications. Intraoperative fluoroscopy and neurophysiological measurements are performed to ensure the correct position of pedicle screws. Newer procedures with fluoroscopic- and computertomographic-assisted navigation are advertised as less dangerous and with a more accurate screw position. HYPOTHESIS: Is the freehand technique used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis safer than other methods with regard to complications caused by screw malposition and intraoperative radiation exposure? MATERIAL AND METHODS: Register data of 34 consecutive idiopathic scoliosis patients with two structural curves (Lenke 3 and 6) were collected prospectively in our scoliosis center and were retrospectively analyzed. The following parameters were evaluated: total radiation product, time of fluoroscopy, number of fused segments, time of operation, blood loss, screw-related complications and number of instrumented pedicle screws. All values were given as mean ± standard deviation and statistically analyzed. Finally, our data were compared on accuracy of screw placement and radiation exposure to data from literature with screw placement under navigation. RESULTS: Average age at the time of surgery was 23.6 ± 12 years. The average thoracic curve was 69.2 ± 14.2° preoperatively and 21.7 ± 12.8° postoperatively (correction 69.9%), the average lumbar curve was 64.3° ± 10.8° preoperatively and corrected to 15.6 ± 10.4° postoperatively (correction 76.2%). The total radiation product per patient was 145.7 ± 86.1 cGy*cm², the time of fluoroscopy 31.7 ± 23.5 s (11.5 segments), the time of operation 267.2 ± 64.1 min and the blood loss 700.4 ± 522.3 ml. A total of 803 pedicle screws were placed. No screw-associated complications were detected in the entire collective. The comparison of our data with freehand placement of pedicle screws to literature data showed a noticeable higher radiation exposure for the patient during fluoroscopic- and computertomographic-assisted navigation. DISCUSSION: The results showed that positioning of pedicle screws with freehand technique in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is accompanied with considerably lower intraoperative radiation exposure compared to fluoroscopic- or computertomographic-assisted navigation. An increased radiation exposure of these typically young patients is associated with an increased long-term risk for the occurrence of radiation-induced malignant diseases. With appropriate surgical experience, placement of pedicle screws in freehand technique is safe and effective and with similar accuracy than screws placed under navigation, but produces significantly less radiation exposure to the patients.