The CIMT-monitoring panel: a two-step approach to harmonize the enumeration of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes by structural and functional assays.

The interpretation of the results obtained from immunomonitoring of clinical trials is a difficult task due to the variety of methods and protocols available to detect vaccine-specific T-cell responses. This heterogeneity as well as the lack of standards has led to significant scepticism towards published results. In February 2005, a working group was therefore founded under the aegis of the Association for Immunotherapy of Cancer ("CIMT") in order to compare techniques and protocols applied for the enumeration of antigen-specific T-cell responses. Here we present the results from two consecutive phases of an international inter-laboratory testing project referred to as the "CIMT monitoring panel". A total of 13 centers from six European countries participated in the study in which pre-tested PBMC samples, synthetic peptides and PE-conjugated HLA-tetramers were prepared centrally and distributed to participants. All were asked to determine the number of antigen-specific T-cells in each sample using tetramer staining and one functional assay. The results of the first testing round revealed that the total number of cells analyzed was the most important determinant for the sensitive detection of antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cells by tetramer staining. Analysis by ELISPOT was influenced by a combination of cell number and a resting phase after thawing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Therefore, the experiments were repeated in a second phase but now the participants were asked to change their protocols according to the new guidelines distilled from the results of the first phase. The recommendations improved the number of antigen-specific T-cell responses that were detected and decreased the variability between the laboratories. We conclude that a two-step approach in inter-laboratory testing allows the identification of distinct variables that influence the sensitivity of different T-cell assays and to formally show that a defined correction to the protocols successfully increases the sensitivity and reduces the inter-center variability. Such "two-step" inter-laboratory projects could define rational bases for accepted international guidelines and thereby lead to the harmonization of the techniques used for immune monitoring.

Evidence for involvement of clonally expanded CD8+ T cells in anticancer immune responses in CLL patients following nonmyeloablative conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We have analyzed the clonotype composition of CD8+ T cells following nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Consecutive analyses of blood samples taken up to 2 years following HCT, demonstrated that CD8+ T-cell clonality was highly dynamic in the early phases after HCT, but became more stable after 4-5 months. Moreover, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) given for disease progression in one of the patients led to establishment of recurrent as well as new T-cell clonotypes. This coincided with disease remission, strongly suggesting that these T cells were engaged with anti-CLL cytotoxicity. To examine the functional capacity of stable clonally expanded T cells after HCT, CD8+ T cells isolated post-transplant from the recipients were stimulated ex vivo with CLL cells and subsequently analyzed by FACS for surface expression of the marker for cytotoxic activity, CD107a. Stimulation with CLL cells indeed led to surface expression of CD107a, and clonotype analyses of sorted cells demonstrated that CD107a positive T cells were stably expanded following HCT. Our data suggest that clonally expanded CD8+ T-cell clones participate in the ongoing T-cell response against CLL cells following HCT with NMA conditioning.