Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(6): 743-747, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580560

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare closed percutaneous screw reduction to traditional open reduction-internal fixation (OR-IF) for the treatment of anterior table fractures. Both groups were evaluated in terms of operative variables, complications, and treatment success. Of 32 patients included, 19 patients underwent OR-IF, while 13 underwent percutaneous screw reduction. The median operative time, length of hospital stays, and treatment cost of the OR-IF group were 100 min (range 60-130), 4 days (range 3-9), and $727 (range $642-$1291), respectively. The same variables for the closed reduction group were 30 min (range 20-40), 2 days (range 1-2), and $303 (range $252-$349), respectively. The closed reduction group exhibited a shorter operative time (p< 0.001), reduced length of hospital stays (p< 0.001), lower treatment cost (p< 0.001), and a lower complication rate (p = 0.025) compared to the OR-IF group. Late-term outcomes in both groups showed no visible contour changes or step deformities. In conclusion, the percutaneous screw reduction technique is a safe and effective option with minimal morbidity in the treatment of frontal sinus anterior table fractures. Therefore, traditional OR-IF should be reserved for fractures that are not suitable for reduction using minimally invasive techniques.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Frontal Sinus , Open Fracture Reduction , Skull Fractures , Humans , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Frontal Sinus/surgery , Frontal Sinus/injuries , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Skull Fractures/surgery , Aged , Young Adult , Length of Stay , Operative Time , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Closed Fracture Reduction/methods
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36220677

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results and to evaluate the validity of the treatment algorithm that can be safely applied in dfrontal sinus fractures. All patients were evaluated in terms of late-term contour deformity and further craniometric analysis for measurement of maximum amount of displacement, fracture surface area (mm2) and the maximum angulation of the fracture (degree) were done. 125 patients (101 male, 24 female) with frontal sinus fractures with an average age of 22.4 years (range,17-66 years) were reviewed. All patients with isolated anterior table fractures without displacement were followed up on conservative basis. 33 patients with anterior table fractures with displacement and 39 patients with anterior and posterior table fractures were also followed on conservative basis without surgical intervention. The cut-off value of the maximum amount of displacement was confirmed to be 4.5 mm in prediction of late-term contour deformities (p < 0.001). The maximum amount of displacement was decreased by an average of 1.8 mm at late-term. Apart from the standard protocols, within the limitations of the study it seems that isolated anterior table fractures with a maximum amount of displacement of less than 4.5 mm can be treated conservatively without leading to contour deformities. CSF leakage in the acute setting might not always require cranialization and this may spontaneously resolve within 10 days. Cranialization should be considered whenever CSF leakage lasts longer than 10 days.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...