ABSTRACT
A multiple hypothesis tracking approach to the segmentation of small 3D vessel structures is presented. By simultaneously tracking multiple hypothetical vessel trajectories, low contrast passages can be traversed, leading to an improved tracking performance in areas of low contrast. This work also contributes a novel mathematical vessel template model, with which an accurate vessel centerline extraction is obtained. The tracking is fast enough for interactive segmentation and can be combined with other segmentation techniques to form robust hybrid methods. This is demonstrated by segmenting both the liver arteries in CT angiography data, which is known to pose great challenges, and the coronary arteries in 32 CT cardiac angiography data sets in the Rotterdam Coronary Artery Algorithm Evaluation Framework, for which ground-truth centerlines are available.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Coronary Angiography/methods , Hepatic Artery/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Efficiently obtaining a reliable coronary artery centerline from computed tomography angiography data is relevant in clinical practice. Whereas numerous methods have been presented for this purpose, up to now no standardized evaluation methodology has been published to reliably evaluate and compare the performance of the existing or newly developed coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. This paper describes a standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for the quantitative evaluation of coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. The contribution of this work is fourfold: (1) a method is described to create a consensus centerline with multiple observers, (2) well-defined measures are presented for the evaluation of coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms, (3) a database containing 32 cardiac CTA datasets with corresponding reference standard is described and made available, and (4) 13 coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms, implemented by different research groups, are quantitatively evaluated and compared. The presented evaluation framework is made available to the medical imaging community for benchmarking existing or newly developed coronary centerline extraction algorithms.
