Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Unfallchirurg ; 118(12): 1067-9, 2015 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26160128

ABSTRACT

In the literature epilepsy is described as the most common cause of generalized seizures. Vertebral body fractures are a rare complication of epileptic convulsions, occurring with an incidence of 3%. We present the case of a 37-year-old healthy patient, who sustained contiguous fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine during the first manifestation of epilepsy with primary localized and then secondary generalized epileptic seizures. A complication-free outcome was achieved with a combination of conservative and operative therapies.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy/complications , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Spinal Fractures/diagnosis , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Treatment Outcome
2.
Percept Mot Skills ; 85(1): 347-50, 1997 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9293599

ABSTRACT

To compare hiking stick use on lateral stability while balancing with or without a load (15-kg internal frame backpack) under conditions of no stick, 1 stick, and 2 sticks for six trials 15 volunteers ages 19 to 23 years (M = 21.7 yr.) were tested six separate times on a stability platform. During randomly ordered, 1-min. trials, the length of time (sec.) the subject maintained balance (+/-10 degrees of horizontal) and the number of deviations beyond 10 degrees were recorded simultaneously. Backpack and hiking sticks were individually adjusted for each subject. A 2 x 3 repeated factor analysis of variance indicated that subjects balanced significantly longer both with and without a load while using 2 hiking sticks than 1 or 0 sticks. Significantly fewer deviations beyond 10 degrees were found when subjects were without a load and using 1 or 2 sticks versus when they used none, and no significant difference in the number of deviations were found between 1 and 2 hiking sticks. When subjects were equipped with a load, significantly improved balance was found only between the 2 sticks and no sticks. Balance was significantly enhanced by using hiking sticks, and two sticks were more effective than one while carrying a load. An increase in maintenance of static balance may reduce the possibility of falling and injury while standing on loose alpine terrain.


Subject(s)
Canes , Mountaineering , Postural Balance , Walking , Weight-Bearing , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Adult , Female , Humans , Male
3.
Br J Sports Med ; 23(1): 34-40, 1989 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2659130

ABSTRACT

The indiscriminate use of caffeine by people of all ages may present health hazards. The public at large needs to be more informed of the presence of caffeine in commonly consumed foods and beverages, particularly by infants, children and pregnant women. It is the responsibility of all consumers to investigate the caffeine content of suspected products so that intake may be objectively monitored. Although doubts still exist about the efficacy of caffeine as an ergogenic aid, particularly for exercise of high intensity and short duration, the IOC and the National Collegiate Athletic Association of the US have adopted bans on the use of caffeine to aid sport performance. Currently, both of these organizations prohibit the concentration of caffeine in urine to exceed 15 micrograms-ml-1. That is to say, only very large amounts of caffeine are not permitted at present. Additional research is needed to confirm or deny the contraindications presented by the ingestion of caffeine on a chronic basis.


Subject(s)
Caffeine/pharmacology , Caffeine/adverse effects , Humans , Physical Endurance/drug effects , Vision, Ocular/drug effects
4.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 11(3): 96-9, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18796922

ABSTRACT

Until recently, resistive training for prepubescents has met largely with skepticism. Original, and possibly premature, conclusions with respect to the efficacy of weight training on prepubescents, considered insufficient circulating androgens in children as the predominant restriction to strength gains. Additionally, safety concerns regarding bone integrity, epiphyseal continuity and risk of injury have been common. A review of the most recent investigations overwhelmingly supports significant strength gains in prepubescents as a result of weight training. Further, based on recent findings of short-term prepubertal weight training, no damage to bone, epiphyses, growth tissue, or muscle has been reported. In light of these findings, weight training may be recommended provided expert professionals are consulted and strict supervision is maintained. It is also recommended that repetitions be maintained within the 6-10 range rather than utilizing maximum weight. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1989;11(3):96-99.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...