Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 18(8): e0287497, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616224

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The self-administered version of the Mediterranean Diet Scale (MDS) has been developed to test the inherent characteristics of this dietary pattern in a quick and simple way, due to the need of this assessment in the clinical and research setting. This study aimed to translate and psychometrically validate the self-administered MDS in Arabic (CRBS-A). METHODS: The original (English) version was originally translated to Arabic, followed by back-translation. Next, 10 healthcare providers, followed by 10 cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients rated the face and content validity (CV) of materials, providing input to improve cross-cultural applicability. Then, 200 patients from Saudi Arabia completed the questionnaire, of which factor structure, internal consistency, criterion and construct validity were assessed. RESULTS: Content and face validity was supported based on experts and patients' reviews (ranges: CV scores 0.9-1.0/1.0 and clarity 3.5 to 4.5/5). Minor edits were made. Subsequent factor analysis revealed 4 factors consistent with the original version of the instrument, all internally consistent. Total CRBS-A α was 0.74. Criterion validity was confirmed by the significantly higher scores in patients who participated in CR. Construct validity was also established by significant associations between MDS scores and monthly family income, having the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome or with a history of valve repair or replacement, being obese or having dyslipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results confirm the validity and reliability of the MDS in Arabic-speaking patients.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Diet, Mediterranean , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Translations , Obesity
2.
Food Funct ; 14(12): 5516-5536, 2023 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278997

ABSTRACT

Diet composition has a great impact on body composition. Several studies have suggested a beneficial effect of adding olive oil to a calorie-restricted diet as a weight loss strategy. However, there is no clear direction regarding the effect of olive oil on body fat distribution. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of olive oil consumption (for cooking or as a supplement) on body fat distribution in adults. The present study was conducted following the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42021234652). All randomized clinical trials of parallel or crossover design found in PubMed (via MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases that compared the effects of olive oil with other oils on body fat distribution in adults were included. 52 articles were included. The results indicate that the consumption of olive oil does not seem to alter the distribution of body fat, despite a small indication that supplementation in capsules can increase adipose mass (Mean Difference = 0.28 kg, 95% CI [-0.27, 0.83]; between-groups difference p = 0.59) and waist circumference (mean difference = 1.74 kg, 95% CI [0.86, 1.62]; between-groups difference p < 0.01) and decrease its auxiliary culinary use (mean difference = -0.32 kg, 95% CI [-0.90, 0.26]). Lean mass responds negatively to OO the higher the dose (slope = -0.61, 95% CI [-1.01, -0.21], p = 0.003) and time offered (slope = -0.8822, 95% CI [-1.44, -0.33], p = 0.002). In conclusion, this systematic review showed that OO ingestion in different delivery vehicles, dosages, and durations can interfere body composition. It is important to emphasize that some other aspects of the population and the intervention, that were not possible to be explored in the analysis, could confound the real effects of OO on body composition.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , Diet , Adult , Humans , Dietary Supplements , Obesity , Olive Oil , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 198: 110594, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36842478

ABSTRACT

AIM: Investigate the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer. METHOD: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis of cohort studies following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using RevMan software. A systematic search of Medline databases via PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Scopus databases, and Web of Science was performed until July 2021. In addition to investigating the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer, the influence of the variables of the Human Development Index (HDI), glycated hemoglobin, and follow-up time of the participants on the incidence of the first diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) was analyzed through meta-regression. For the meta-analysis of cumulative incidence and possible variable associations, RevMan software was used in the Metaprop data package with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 9,772 articles were identified out of which 87 were selected and 12 studies ultimately included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of cumulative incidence was 5.65% (95% CI: 4.20; 7.57). By meta-regression, a significant inverse association was identified between DFU incidence and HDI (estimate - 2.38; 95% CI - 4.10--0.67; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study presents the cumulative incidence for the first DFU, an inexistent datum in the national and international literature, and the HDI was inversely associated with the incidence of DFU.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Diabetic Foot/etiology , Incidence , Bibliometrics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...