[Diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis B virus infection: Czech national guidelines].

The new recommendations reflect the increase in knowledge that has been reported since the release of previous Czech guidelines in September 2014. The basis for these guidelines were the European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines from April 2017. According to qualified estimates, there are 240 million people with chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection worldwide. The Czech Republic is among the countries with a low prevalence of HBV infection. According to the latest seroprevalence study, 0.56 % of the Czech citizens were chronically infected with HBV in 2001. A similar study conducted in only two regions of the Czech Republic in 2013 showed a prevalence of only 0.064 %. HBV infection can lead to serious life-threatening liver damage - fulminant hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The main goals of treatment are to prolong the length of life and improve its quality by preventing the progression of chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis, cirrhosis decompensation and development of HCC. The goals may be achieved if HBV replication is suppressed in a sustained manner. Additional goals are prevention of vertical transmission from mother to newborn, inhibition of HBV reactivation and therapy of HBV-related extrahepatic manifestations. Generally, there are two different strategies of chronic hepatitis B therapy available - treatment with nucleoside or nucleotide inhibitors (NIs) or with pegylated interferon alfa. Currently, the vast majority of Czech and European patients are treated with NIs. The NIs that have been approved for HBV treatment in the European Union include lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir (ETV), telbivudin (TBV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). TAF and TBV have not yet been marketed in the Czech Republic. The main advantages of treatment with potent NIs with a high barrier to resistance (ETV, TDF, TAF) are their predictable high long-term antiviral efficacy leading to undetectable HBV DNA levels in the vast majority of compliant patients as well as their favorable safety profiles. These drugs can be used in any HBV infected patient and represent the only treatment option for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, liver transplants, extrahepatic HBV-related manifestations, severe acute hepatitis B or chronic HBV reactivation.

[Diagnosis and therapy of chronic hepatitis B: Czech national guidelines]. / Doporucený postup diagnostiky a lécby chronické hepatitidy B: Datum vydání doporucení: zárí 2014.

The new recommendations reflect the increase in knowledge that has been reported since the release of previous Czech guidelines in April 2009. According to qualified estimates, there are 350-400 million people with chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection worldwide. The Czech Republic is among the countries with a low prevalence of HBV infection. According to the latest seroprevalent study, 0.56 % of the Czech citizens were chronically infected with HBV in 2001. HBV infection can lead to serious life-threatening liver damage - fulminant hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The goals of treatment are to prolong the length of life and improve its quality by preventing the progression of chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis, cirrhosis decompensation and development of HCC. The goals can be achieved if HBV replication is suppressed in a sustained manner. Then, the accompanying reduction in histological activity lowers the risk of cirrhosis and HCC, particularly in non-cirrhotic patients. Currently, two different strategies for treating chronic hepatitis B are available. Treatment of finite duration is with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), entecavir (ETV), or tenofovir (TDV). A 48-week course of PEG-IFN is mainly recommended for HBeAg-positive patients with the best chance of anti-HBe seroconversion. Finite-duration of ETV or TDV treatment is available for HBeAg-positive patients who seroconvert to anti-HBe on treatment. However, treatment duration is unpredictable prior to the therapy as it depends on the timing of anti-HBe seroconversion and the treatment continuation following anti-HBe seroconversion (therapy should be prolonged for additional 12 months after anti-HBe seroconversion). Long-term ETV or TDV therapy is necessary for HBeAg-positive patients who do not develop anti-HBe seroconversion and for HBeAg-negative patients. This strategy is also recommended for patients with cirrhosis irrespective of the initial HBeAg status or anti-HBe seroconversion on treatment. The advantage of ETV and TDV is based on their high potency and optimal resistance profile.