Radial chromatin positioning is shaped by local gene density, not by gene expression.

G- and R-bands of metaphase chromosomes are characterized by profound differences in gene density, CG content, replication timing, and chromatin compaction. The preferential localization of gene-dense, transcriptionally active, and early replicating chromatin in the nuclear interior and of gene-poor, later replicating chromatin at the nuclear envelope has been demonstrated to be evolutionary-conserved in various cell types. Yet, the impact of different local chromatin features on the radial nuclear arrangement of chromatin is still not well understood. In particular, it is not known whether radial chromatin positioning is preferentially shaped by local gene density per se or by other related parameters such as replication timing or transcriptional activity. The interdependence of these distinct chromatin features on the linear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence precludes a simple dissection of these parameters with respect to their importance for the reorganization of the linear DNA organization into the distinct radial chromatin arrangements observed in the nuclear space. To analyze this problem, we generated probe sets of pooled bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones from HSA 11, 12, 18, and 19 representing R/G-band-assigned chromatin, segments with different gene density and gene loci with different expression levels. Using multicolor 3D flourescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and 3D image analysis, we determined their localization in the nucleus and their positions within or outside the corresponding chromosome territory (CT). For each BAC data on local gene density within 2- and 10-Mb windows, as well as GC (guanine and cytosine) content, replication timing and expression levels were determined. A correlation analysis of these parameters with nuclear positioning revealed regional gene density as the decisive parameter determining the radial positioning of chromatin in the nucleus in contrast to band assignment, replication timing, and transcriptional activity. We demonstrate a polarized distribution of gene-dense vs gene-poor chromatin within CTs with respect to the nuclear border. Whereas we confirm previous reports that a particular gene-dense and transcriptionally highly active region of about 2 Mb on 11p15.5 often loops out from the territory surface, gene-dense and highly expressed sequences were not generally found preferentially at the CT surface as previously suggested.

Chromatin domains and the interchromatin compartment form structurally defined and functionally interacting nuclear networks.

In spite of strong evidence that the nucleus is a highly organized organelle, a consensus on basic principles of the global nuclear architecture has not so far been achieved. The chromosome territory-interchromatin compartment (CT-IC) model postulates an IC which expands between chromatin domains both in the interior and the periphery of CT. Other models, however, dispute the existence of the IC and claim that numerous chromatin loops expand between and within CTs. The present study was undertaken to resolve these conflicting views. (1) We demonstrate that most chromatin exists in the form of higher-order chromatin domains with a compaction level at least 10 times above the level of extended 30 nm chromatin fibers. A similar compaction level was obtained in a detailed analysis of a particularly gene-dense chromosome region on HSA 11, which often expanded from its CT as a finger-like chromatin protrusion. (2) We further applied an approach which allows the experimental manipulation of both chromatin condensation and the width of IC channels in a fully reversible manner. These experiments, together with electron microscopic observations, demonstrate the existence of the IC as a dynamic, structurally distinct nuclear compartment, which is functionally linked with the chromatin compartment.

Higher order chromatin architecture in the cell nucleus: on the way from structure to function.

The cell nucleus is a highly compartmentalized structure. In this review we describe controversial views on higher order chromatin organization from the level of higher order chromatin domains built up from folded chromatin fibers to the level of chromosome territories and the interchromatin compartment (IC), which harbors non-chromatin nuclear domains, such as interchromatin granule clusters (IGCs visualized in the electron microscope) or splicing factor-containing speckles (visualized by fluorescence microscopy). Emphasis is laid on the definition and functional importance of a nuclear compartment located at the periphery of chromatin domains in direct contact with the IC, termed the perichromatin region (PR). Ongoing experiments to elucidate the topological relationships between PR and IC have provided new insights into the functional interplay between transcription and splicing. As an example, we discuss the structure and nuclear topology of perichromatin fibrils (FPs) contained in the PR and their functional interplay with IGCs/speckles. In addition we discuss the advantages and drawbacks of experimental approaches currently used to study nuclear architecture and function in fixed and living cells.

Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei.

A gene density-related difference in the radial arrangement of chromosome territories (CTs) was previously described for human lymphocyte nuclei with gene-poor CT #18 located toward the nuclear periphery and gene-dense CT #19 in the nuclear interior (Croft, J.A., J.M. Bridger, S. Boyle, P. Perry, P. Teague, and W.A. Bickmore. 1999. J. Cell Biol. 145:1119-1131). Here, we analyzed the radial distribution of chromosome 18 and 19 chromatin in six normal cell types and in eight tumor cell lines, some of them with imbalances and rearrangements of the two chromosomes. Our findings demonstrate that a significant difference in the radial distribution of #18 and #19 chromatin is a common feature of higher order chromatin architecture in both normal and malignant cell types. However, in seven of eight tumor cell lines, the difference was less pronounced compared with normal cell nuclei due to a higher fraction of nuclei showing an inverted CT position, i.e., a CT #18 located more internally than a CT #19. This observation emphasizes a partial loss of radial chromatin order in tumor cell nuclei.