ABSTRACT
AIM: To study the frequency of amblyogenic factors in patients with congenital ptosis.congenital ptosis more than 1 year old were included. Amblyopia was defined as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) less than 10/10 or a difference between the two eyes of at least 2/10. In patients too young to be measured by the linear Snellen E test, fixation behavior was observed. Different types of amblyopia were assessed for each patient as: 1) anisometropic amblyopia: astigmatic anisometropia≥ 1dpt, hyperopic spherical anisometropia≥ 1dpt, myopic spherical anisometropia≥ -3dpt (with cycloplegia);2) strabismic amblyopia, and 3) stimulus deprivation amblyopia (SDA). Then the total incidence of amblyopia and each type of it were obtained. Patients with uni-and bi-lateral ptosis were also compared. Each specific cause was refractive amblyopia in 29.8%, SDA in 10.5%, strabismic amblyopia in 4.3%. Amblyopia was more frequent in severe ptosis, 76% in patients with covered optical axes (OA), compared to non-covered OA (22.5%). In unilateral ptosis with covered OA, astigmatic anisometropic amblyopia was more frequent, and in bilateral ptosis with at least one eye covered OA, spherical anisometropic amblyopia was more frequent. In both unilateral and bilateral ptosis, SDA was more common if the OA was covered. Paying attention to all causes of amblyopia may be important in preventing amblyopia in a child with a ptotic eye.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate movement disorder patterns and extraocular muscle involvement in Iranian Graves' Ophthalmopathy (GO) patients. METHODS: We examined 75 patients (37 women and 38 men) with GO. Female to male ratio was 0.97 among all patients and 0.72 among restrictive myopathic cases (male 18(58.1%), female 13 (41.9%), P=0.2). Their age ranged from 16 to 66 years; mean age was 35.42+/-11.63 and 33.55+/-10,.31 among patients affected by restrictive enlargement and who did not, respectively. RESULTS: Orbital CT assessment showed EOM enlargement in 124 out of 150 orbits (82.6%). clinical restriction was evident in 31 (41.3%) out of 75 patients. Bilateral restriction was observed in 14 out of 31 (45.1%). The most frequent type of movement limitation was supraduction limitation followed by abduction, inferaduction, and adduction limitations (59%, 40%, 31.1% and 13.3% respectively). This was compatible with Hess screen results and orbital CT reports in regard of IR, MR, SR and LR involvement. Sixteen out of 75 patients reported diplopia. Mean Hertel exophthalmometry readings were higher in eyes with restrictive myopathy. CONCLUSION: This study showed more restrictive myopathy in cases with more extraocular enlargement and positive correlation between severity of inferior rectus enlargement and Hertel reading. A higher rate of male patients in our study may be due to ethnic differences in GO in Iranian patients or due to severity of involvement in this group.
