A Prospective Intervention Study With 6 Months Follow-up of the Effect of Reablement in Home Dwelling Elderly: Patient-reported and Observed Outcomes.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of a reablement intervention (a person-centered, interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach) compared with usual care services in home-dwelling elderly experiencing functional declines in activities of daily living. Design: A non-randomized controlled trial comparing a reablement intervention with usual care; outcomes were measured at baseline, after intervention, and at a 6-month from baseline in both groups. Setting: Municipal public health service. Participants: Sixty-five home-dwelling elderly with functional decline were assigned by the participants home care service zone to a reablement group (n=35), or a usual care group (n=30). The mean participant age was 80±11 years in the reablement group and 78±12 in the usual care group. Intervention: The reablement group received a person-centered and tailored reablement program provided by an interdisciplinary team, consisting of a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist, and a nurse. The usual care group received standard home care services. Main Outcome Measures: The dimension "Your health today" from the European Quality of Life-Visual Analog Scale (HRQOL), the patient-specific functional scale for goals in ADL (PSFS), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and home care services in hours per week. Results: There were significant differences over time in favor of the reablement group with between-group effect sizes of Cohen h2=0.36 (P=.001) for HRQOL, h2=0.60 (P=.001) for PSFS, h2=0.30 (P=.001) for SPPB, and h2=0.10 (P=.013) for hours of home care services per week. The within-group effect size for PSFS was h2=0.15 (P=.010) in favor of the reablement group. The mean number of hours of home care services per week was mean 0.38±1.07 (P=.001) in the reablement group and mean 30.38±64.13 (P=.023) in the usual care group. Conclusions: The participants in the reablement group achieved and maintained better physical function, a higher HRQOL and needed considerably less home care services than the usual care group participants. Thus, reablement appears to be a more beneficial and sustainable approach than the usual care services for the home-dwelling elderly with functional decline.

Long-term follow-up of complex oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery, standard breast conservation and skin-sparing mastectomy in DCIS - a register-based study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluate oncological safety in complex oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery(C-OBCS) for DCIS. It still needs to be defined whether it is equivalent to standard breast conservation(S-BCS) or an alternative to skin-sparing mastectomy(SSM). This study compares local recurrence rates(LR), disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the three surgical techniques. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective register-based study on LR, DFS and OS of patients operated with S-BCS(n=1388), C-OBCS (n=106) or skin-sparing mastectomy (n=218) for DCIS diagnosed 2007-2020. Data was extracted from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Registry. RESULTS: In the S-BCS, C-OBCS and SSM groups, median age was 60, 58 and 51 years (p<0.001), median size 15, 25, and 40 mm (p<0.001) and median follow-up 55, 48 and 76 months. At ten years, the overall LR was 12.7%, 14.3% for S-BCS, 11.2% for C-OBCS and 6.8% for SSM. Overall DFS at ten years was 82.3%, 80.5% for S-BCS, 82.4% for C-OBCS and 90.4% for SSM. At ten years, the OS was 93.8%, 93.0% in S-BCS, 93.3% in C-OBCS and 96.6% in the SSM group. Weighted Kaplan Meier plots showed that SSM had a significantly higher DFS than S-BCS (p=0.003) and C-OBCS (p=0.029). DFS in C-OBCS versus S-BCS and the difference in OS was not significant (p=0.264). CONCLUSION: SSM had a significantly higher DFS than S-BCS and C-OBCS. The difference in DFS between S-BCS and C-OBCS, and OS between the three groups was not statistically significant. Our study suggests that C-OBCS is a safe alternative to S-BCS and SSM.

Oncological outcomes after simple and skin-sparing mastectomy of ductal carcinoma in situ: A register-based cohort study of 576 Norwegian women.

BACKGROUND: For Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), recurrence is shown to be higher after skin-sparing (SSM) versus simple (SM) mastectomy. This study aimed to compare the two groups recurrence rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall (OS) survival. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective register-based cohort study of women operated with SSM (n = 338) or SM (n = 238) for DCIS between 2007 and 2017. Data from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Registry was used to estimate recurrences rates, DFS and OS. RESULTS: Mean age was 51 and 61 years in the SSM and SM groups, respectively. Median follow-up time was 77 months for SSM (range: 21-152 months) vs 84 months for SM (range: 7-171 months). After five years of follow-up, the overall recurrence rate (OR) was 2.1%; 3.9% for SSM and 0.9% for SM. After ten years, the rates were 3.0%, 6.2% for SSM and still 0.9% for SM. DFS was after ten years 92.2%; 91.8% for SSM, and 92.4% for SM. OS was 95.0%; 97.5% for SSM and 93.3% for SM at ten years. For SSM, involved margins represented a significant risk for recurrence. CONCLUSION: The recurrence rate was higher in the SSM versus the SM group. Whether the difference is due to the operating procedures or underlying risk factors remains unknown. When stratifying for the difference in age, there was no statistical difference in DFS or OS. Involved margins in the SSM group were associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

Upper limb physical function and adverse effects after breast cancer surgery: a prospective 2.5-year follow-up study and preoperative measures.

OBJECTIVE: To examine upper limb physical function and adverse effects after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer to identify impairments that can inform rehabilitation strategies. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort. Upper limb measurements were studied preoperatively and 2.5 years after breast cancer treatment. SETTING: Hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of patients with early-stage primary breast cancer (N=391): the ALND surgery group (mean age, 55±10y) and the SLNB group (mean age, 57±10y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Arm lymphedema (≥10% increased arm volume relative to control arm volume), grip strength (in kilograms), shoulder mobility, pain intensity during isometric shoulder abduction (on a 100-mm visual analog scale), and body mass index (kg/m(2)). Parametric/nonparametric tests were used for hypothesized changes and differences, and regression analysis was used for confounding factors. RESULTS: We observed more adverse effects in women treated with ALND than with SLNB after 2.5 years (P<.05): arm lymphedema (17% vs 3%), grip strength reduction (12% vs 2%), and shoulder abduction-provoked pain (increase of 6% vs decrease of 50%). The adverse effects were similar for affected and control upper limbs for all outcomes except arm lymphedema, which occurred only on the affected side. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects in both affected and control/unaffected upper limb were observed after 2.5-year follow-up in both ALND and SLNB groups, but a higher prevalence was observed in the ALND group. Thus, women going through ALND surgery may benefit from further postoperative physical therapy, including resistance and strength exercise, focusing on pain management.

Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in invasive breast carcinomas and its prognostic impact.

Representative tumour sections from 468 patients with invasive breast cancer were immunostained for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and evaluated. The relationships between COX-2 expression, clinical outcome and various clinicopathological variables, including tumour vascularity and disseminated tumour cells (DTC) in the bone marrow were examined. COX-2 expression in invasive breast carcinoma cells was positively associated with oestrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positivity (p<0.001). Triple-negative tumours showed no/low COX-2 expression more frequently than other tumour types (p<0.001). Expression of COX-2 was not associated with breast cancer-specific survival (p=0.49, log-rank) or distant disease-free survival (p=0.67, log-rank) for all patients, including lymph node-negative, untreated patients (p>0.14, log-rank). There was also no significant association between COX-2 expression and histological grade, tumour size, nodal status, DTC in bone marrow, p53, HER2, or tumour vascularity. In conclusion, COX-2 expression in this series was associated with the presence of hormone receptors. Low COX-2 expression was observed in triple-negative breast carcinomas.

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in invasive breast carcinoma: prognostic significance and relationship with markers for aggressiveness.

AIMS: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR-1) and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) play a role in breast cancer growth and angiogenesis. We examined the expression and relationship with clinical outcome and other prognostic factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tumour sections from 468 breast cancer patients were immunostained for VEGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2, and their relationships with tumour vascularity, disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) in bone marrow and other clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. VEGF, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 immunoreactivities were observed in invasive breast carcinoma cells. VEGF expression was significantly associated with VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 expression (P < 0.001). High-level cytoplasmic expression of VEGFR-1 was associated with significantly reduced distant disease-free survival (DDFS) (P = 0.017, log-rank) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (P = 0.005, log-rank) for all patients, and for node-negative patients without systemic treatment (DDFS, P = 0.03, log-rank; BCSS, P = 0.009, log-rank). VEGFR-1 expression was significantly associated with histopathological markers of aggressiveness (P < 0.05). Significantly reduced survival was observed in DTC-positive patients as compared with DTC-negative patients in the combined moderate/high VEGFR-1 group (P < 0.001 for DDFS and BCSS), and the same was true for DDFS in the moderate VEGFR-2 group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: High-level expression of VEGFR-1 indicates reduced survival. Higher-level expression of VEGFR-1 or VEGFR-2 in primary breast carcinomas combined with the presence of DTC selects a prognostically unfavourable patient group.

Detection and clinical relevance of early disseminated breast cancer cells depend on their cytokeratin expression pattern.

The factors determining the clinical relevance of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in breast cancer patients are largely unknown. Here we compared the specificity and clinical performance of two antibodies frequently used for DTC detection. Reactivities of antibodies A45-B/B3 (A45) and AE1/AE3 (AE) for selected cytokeratins (CK) were assessed by 2-DE Western Blot analysis. Using these antibodies bone marrow aspirates from 391 breast cancer patients (M(0), pT1-3, pN0-3) were screened for the presence of DTC. To obtain prognostic information, patients were followed up over a median of 83 months for time to relapse and 99 months for time to death. Among the analyzed CK, AE detected CK5, CK7, CK8, and CK19, whereas A45 recognized CK7 and CK18. In total, 24 of 391 patients (6.1%) were DTC-positive for A45, and 41 (10.5%) for AE. Although concordance between the two antibodies was 84.4%, overlap among positive cases was only 3.2%. DTC-positivity with AE and A45 was more frequent in patients of higher nodal status (P=0.019 and P=0.036, respectively). Nearly all patients with A45-positive DTC had hormone receptor-positive tumors (23/24), while detection of AE-positive DTC was more frequent among hormone receptor negative patients (P=0.006). Survival analyses of all patients revealed shorter distant disease-free survival (P=0.039) for patients with A45-positive DTC, whereas the prognostic relevance of AE-positive DTC was restricted to node-positive patients. The clinical utility of immunocytochemical (ICC) DTC detection depends on the anti-CK antibody used, which may reflect the complex CK composition of DTC.

Breast carcinoma vascularity: a comparison of manual microvessel count and Chalkley count.

Manual counting of microvessels as intratumoral microvessel density (MVD) and Chalkley counting have been used in several studies to assess the prognostic impact of vascularity in invasive breast carcinomas. In our present study, the aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of angiogenesis in invasive breast carcinoma assessed by MVD and Chalkley techniques in the same series of patients. A total of 498 breast carcinoma patients with median follow up time 85 months were evaluated. The tumour vascularity was quantified by both manual microvessel count (MVD) and Chalkley count in CD34 stained breast carcinoma slides by a single investigator blinded to clinical information. Other relevant clinicopathological parameters were noted, including breast cancer related death and both loco-regional and systemic relapse. The patients were stratified by converting MVD and Chalkley counts to categorical variables to assess prognostic impact, and results were compared. High vascular grades using MVD count did not demonstrate any prognostic significance for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) or distant disease free survival (DDFS) either in whole patient group (BCSS, p=0.517, DDFS, p=0.301) or in non-treated node negative patients (p>0.05). Chalkley count showed prognostic significance for both DDFS and BCSS in whole patient group (p<0.001) and also in untreated node negative patient group (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, Chalkley count, but not MVD, retained the prognostic value for BCSS (p=0.007) and DDFS (p=0.014). The Chalkley count for assessing angiogenesis in invasive breast carcinomas demonstrated prognostic value. The Chalkley method appears to be the better method in estimating the prognostic impact of vascularity in invasive breast carcinomas.

Vascularization in primary breast carcinomas: its prognostic significance and relationship with tumor cell dissemination.

PURPOSE: The interaction between tumor cells, stroma, and endothelial cells is important for the dissemination of tumor cells. The aim of the present study is to examine vascularity in primary breast carcinomas and its prognostic significance and relationship with tumor cell dissemination. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 498 invasive breast carcinomas were analyzed. Representative tumor sections were stained for CD34 and CD105, and vascularity was quantified by the Chalkley method. The relationship between Chalkley counts, vascular invasion, disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow, other clinicopathologic variables, and clinical outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: High vascular grades determined by Chalkley counts were significantly associated with shorter distant disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival in all patients (P < 0.001, log-rank) and in node-negative patients not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, both CD34 and CD105 Chalkley counts showed prognostic significance for distant disease-free survival (P = 0.014 and P = 0.026), whereas CD34 also showed prognostic significance for breast cancer-specific survival (P = 0.007). Vascular invasion and DTCs in the bone marrow showed independent prognostic significance. DTC did not discriminate survival for CD34 low Chalkley counts, whereas a very poor prognosis was observed for DTC-positive patients with high CD34 counts. In node-negative patients not receiving systemic chemotherapy, high CD34 and high CD105 counts in combination identified patients with unfavorable outcome, as opposed to all other CD34/CD105 combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Improved identification of risk groups could be obtained by adding CD34 and CD105 vascular analysis to DTC, vascular invasion, and other primary tumor factors. This may facilitate the selection of candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Somatic sequence alterations in twenty-one genes selected by expression profile analysis of breast carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: Genomic alterations have been observed in breast carcinomas that affect the capacity of cells to regulate proliferation, signaling, and metastasis. Re-sequence studies have investigated candidate genes based on prior genetic observations (changes in copy number or regions of genetic instability) or other laboratory observations and have defined critical somatic mutations in genes such as TP53 and PIK3CA. METHODS: We have extended the paradigm and analyzed 21 genes primarily identified by expression profiling studies, which are useful for breast cancer subtyping and prognosis. This study conducted a bidirectional re-sequence analysis of all exons and 5', 3', and evolutionarily conserved regions (spanning more than 16 megabases) in 91 breast tumor samples. RESULTS: Eighty-seven unique somatic alterations were identified in 16 genes. Seventy-eight were single base pair alterations, of which 23 were missense mutations; 55 were distributed across conserved intronic regions or the 5' and 3' regions. There were nine insertion/deletions. Because there is no a priori way to predict whether any one of the identified synonymous and noncoding somatic alterations disrupt function, analysis unique to each gene will be required to establish whether it is a tumor suppressor gene or whether there is no effect. In five genes, no somatic alterations were observed. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the value of re-sequence analysis in cancer gene discovery and underscores the importance of characterizing somatic alterations across genes that are related not only by function, or functional pathways, but also based upon expression patterns.