Myocardial T1 mapping by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging shows early myocardial changes in treatment-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and positive autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to study whether myocardial changes are already detectable by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at the time of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis. METHODS: This single-centre prospective study included 39 treatment-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA, symptom duration <1 year) without any history of heart disease, and 38 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. The disease severity was assessed with clinical evaluation (Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) score) and serological testing (rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA)). The ERA patients were classified into group A (DAS28-CRP score ≥3.2, positive RF and ACPA; n=17) and group B (not fulfilling the group A criteria). The ERA patients and healthy controls underwent 1.5T CMR. RESULTS: Group A patients had significantly higher myocardial global T1 relaxation times than the healthy controls, 987 [965, 1003] ms vs. 979 [960, 991] ms (median [IQR]; p=0.041). A significant difference in T1 was found in the basal, mid inferior and mid anterolateral segments. In a multivariate analysis, prolonged global T1 relaxation time was independently associated with female sex (95% CI [5.62, 51.31] ms, p=0.016), and group A status (95% CI [4.65, 39.01] ms p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: At the time of diagnosis, ERA patients with a higher disease activity (DAS28-CRP score ≥3.2) and both positive RF and ACPA showed prolonged T1 relaxation times in basal myocardial segments. These segments could be most susceptible to the development of myocardial fibrosis, and a segmental reporting style could be useful when estimating the first signs of myocardial fibrosis.

Peak flow measurements in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective comparative study between cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2D and 4D flow and transthoracic echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent valvular disease in the developed countries. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an emerging imaging technique, which has been suggested to improve the evaluation of AS severity compared to two-dimensional (2D) flow and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We investigated the reliability of CMR 2D flow and 4D flow techniques in measuring aortic transvalvular peak systolic flow in patients with severe AS. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 90 patients referred for aortic valve replacement due to severe AS (73.3 ± 11.3 years, aortic valve area 0.7 ± 0.1 cm2, and 54/36 tricuspid/bicuspid), and 10 non-valvular disease controls. All the patients underwent echocardiography and 2D flow and 4D flow CMR. Peak flow velocity measurements were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank sum test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: 4D flow underestimated peak flow velocity in the AS group when compared with TTE (bias - 1.1 m/s, limits of agreement ± 1.4 m/s) and 2D flow (bias - 1.2 m/s, limits of agreement ± 1.6 m/s). The differences between values obtained by TTE (median 4.3 m/s, range 2.7-6.1 m/s) and 2D flow (median 4.5 m/s, range 2.9-6.5 m/s) compared to 4D flow (median 3.1 m/s, range 1.7-5.1 m/s) were significant (p < 0.001). The difference between 2D flow and TTE were insignificant (bias 0.07 m/s, limits of agreement ± 1.5 m/s). In non-valvular disease controls, peak flow velocity was measured higher by 4D flow than 2D flow (1.4 m/s, 1.1-1.7 m/s and 1.3 m/s, 1.1-1.5 m/s, respectively; bias 0.2 m/s, limits of agreement ± 0.16 m/s). CONCLUSIONS: CMR 4D flow significantly underestimates systolic peak flow velocity in patients with severe AS. 2D flow, in turn, estimated the AS velocity accurately, with measured peak flow velocities comparable to TTE.