Out of pocket costs and time/productivity losses for pediatric sepsis in Uganda: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis disproportionately affects children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families in low-resource settings, where care seeking may consume scarce family resources and lead to financial hardships. Those financial hardships may, in turn, contribute to late presentation or failure to seek care and result in high mortality during hospitalization and during the post discharge period, a period of increasingly recognized vulnerability. The purpose of this study is to explore the out-of-pocket costs related to sepsis hospitalizations and post-discharge care among children admitted with sepsis in Uganda. METHODS: This mixed-methods study was comprised of focus group discussions (FGD) with caregivers of children admitted for sepsis, which then informed a quantitative cross-sectional household survey to measure out-of-pocket costs of sepsis care both during initial admission and during the post-discharge period. All participants were families of children enrolled in a concurrent sepsis study. RESULTS: Three FGD with mothers (n = 20) and one FGD with fathers (n = 7) were conducted. Three primary themes that emerged included (1) financial losses, (2) time and productivity losses and (3) coping with costs. A subsequently developed cross-sectional survey was completed for 153 households of children discharged following admission for sepsis. The survey revealed a high cost of care for families attending both private and public facilities, although out-of-pocket cost were higher at private facilities. Half of those surveyed reported loss of income during hospitalization and a third sold household assets, most often livestock, to cover costs. Total mean out-of-pocket costs of hospital care and post-discharge care were 124.50 USD and 44.60 USD respectively for those seeking initial care at private facilities and 62.10 USD and 14.60 USD at public facilities, a high sum in a country with widespread poverty. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that families incur a substantial economic burden in accessing care for children with sepsis.

Gaps in TB preventive therapy for persons initiating antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: an explanatory sequential cascade analysis.

BACKGROUND: The WHO recommends TB symptom screening and TB preventive therapy (TPT) for latent TB infection (LTBI) in persons living with HIV (PLWH). However, TPT uptake remains limited. We aimed to characterize and contextualize gaps in the TPT care cascade among persons enrolling for antiretroviral therapy (ART).SETTING: Four PEPFAR-supported facilities in Uganda.METHODS: We studied a proportionate stratified random sample of persons registering for ART when TPT was available. Patient-level data on eligibility, initiation, and completion were obtained from registers to determine proportion of eligible patients completing each cascade step. We interviewed providers and administrators and used content analysis to identify barriers to guideline-concordant TPT practices.RESULTS: Of 399 study persons, 309 (77%) were women. Median age was 29 (IQR 25-34), CD4 count 405 cells/µL (IQR 222-573), and body mass 23 kg/m² (IQR 21-25). Of 390 (98%) screened, 372 (93%) were TPT-eligible. Only 62 (17%) eligible PLWH initiated and 36 (58%) of 62 completed TPT. Providers reported hesitating to prescribe TPT because they lacked confidence excluding TB by symptom screening alone and feared promoting drug resistance. Although isoniazid was available, past experience of irregular supply discouraged TPT initiation. Providers pointed to insufficient TB-dedicated staff, speculated that patients discounted TB risk, and worried TPT pill burden and side effects depressed ART adherence.CONCLUSIONS: While screening was nearly universal, most eligible PLWH did not initiate TPT. Only about half of those who initiated completed treatment. Providers feared promoting drug resistance, harbored uncertainty about continued availability, and worried TPT could antagonize ART adherence. Our findings suggest urgent need for stakeholder engagement in TPT provision.

The sixth vital sign: HIV status assessment and severe illness triage in Uganda.

Setting: Four in-patient health facilities in western Uganda. Objective: To determine the impact of an innovative multi-modal quality improvement program on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status assessment and the impact of HIV status on severe illness conditions and mortality. Design: This was a staggered, pre-post quasi-experimental study designed to assess a multi-modal intervention (collaborative improvement meetings, audit and feedback, clinical mentoring) for improving quality of care following formal training in the management of severe illness in low-income settings. Results: From August 2014 to May 2015, 5759 patients were hospitalized, of whom 2451 (42.6%) had their HIV status assessed; 395 (16.1%) were HIV-infected. HIV-infected patients were significantly more likely to meet criteria for shock (27.5% vs. 15.1%, risk ratio [RR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-1.9, P < 0.001) and severe respiratory distress (6.7% vs. 4.3%, RR 1.5, 95%CI 1.2-2.0, P < 0.001), and were significantly more likely to die in hospital (12.0% vs. 2.9%, RR 4.1, 95%CI 3.2-5.4, P < 0.001). There was no evidence of improved HIV status assessment during the intervention period (36.5% vs. 44.8%, +8.3%, 95%CI -8.3 to 24.8, P = 0.33). Conclusions: Hospitalized HIV-infected patients in western Uganda are at high risk for severe illness and death. Novel quality improvement strategies are needed to enhance hospital-based HIV testing in high-burden settings.

Contexte : Quatre structures de santé hospitalières dans l'ouest de l'Ouganda.Objectif : Déterminer l'impact d'un programme innovant multimodal d'amélioration de la qualité sur l'évaluation du statut du virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH) et l'impact du statut VIH sur les états de maladie grave et la mortalité.Schéma : Une étude échelonnée, pré-post et quasi-expérimentale conçue pour évaluer une intervention multimodale (réunions d'amélioration concertée, audit et rétro-information, tutorat clinique) pour améliorer la qualité des soins après la formation initiale sur la prise en charge de maladies graves dans un contexte de faibles ressources.Résultats : Entre août 2014 et mai 2015, 5759 patients ont été hospitalisés : 2451 (42,6%) ont eu une évaluation de leur statut VIH et 395 (16,1%) se sont avérés infectés par le VIH. Ces derniers ont été significativement plus susceptibles de répondre à des critères de choc (27,5% contre 15,1% ; rapport de risque [RR] 1,8 ; intervalle de confiance [IC] 95% 1,7­1,9 ; P < 0,001) et de détresse respiratoire grave (6,7% contre 4,3 ; RR 1,5 ; IC95% 1,2­2,0 ; P < 0,001), et ont été significativement plus susceptibles de décéder à l'hôpital (12,0% contre 2,9% ; RR 4,1 ; IC95% 3,2­5,4 ; P < 0,001). Il n'y a pas eu d'éléments en faveur d'une amélioration de l'évaluation du statut VIH pendant la période d'intervention (36,5% contre 44,8% ; +8,3% ; IC95% −8,3 à 24,8 ; P = 0,33).Conclusions : Les patients infectés par le VIH hospitalisés dans l'ouest de l'Ouganda ont un risque élevé de maladie grave et de décès. De nouvelles stratégies d'amélioration de qualité sont requises afin d'augmenter les tests VIH en hôpital dans les contextes à fardeau élevé de maladie.

Marco de referencia: Cuatro establecimientos hospitalarios en la zona occidental de Uganda.Objetivo: Determinar la repercusión de un programa innovador multimodal de mejora de la calidad sobre la evaluación de la situación frente al virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) y la repercusión del estado frente al VIH en materia de enfermedades graves y mortalidad.Método: Se realizó un estudio semi-experimental escalonado pre y post con el fin de evaluar una intervención multimodal (reuniones de colaboración para mejorar de la calidad, auditorías y retroalimentación, tutoría clínica) encaminada a mejorar la calidad de la atención, tras una capacitación formal sobre el manejo de las enfermedades graves en entornos con bajos ingresos.Resultados: De agosto del 2014 a mayo del 2015 se hospitalizaron 5759 pacientes; en 2451 se examinó su situación frente al VIH (42,6%) y 395 presentaban infección por el VIH (16,1%). Los pacientes afectados por el VIH exhibieron una probabilidad significativamente mayor de cumplir con los criterios diagnósticos de choque (27,5% contra 15,1%; cociente de riesgos [RR] 1,8; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95% 1,7­1,9; P < 0,001) y de insuficiencia respiratoria grave (6,7% contra 4,3%, RR 1,5; IC95% 1,2­2,0; P < 0,001) y la probabilidad de morir en el hospital fue significativamente más alta en estos pacientes (12,0% contra 2,9%, RR 4,1; IC95% 3,2­5,4; P < 0,001). No se encontraron pruebas en favor de una mejor evaluación de la situación frente al VIH durante el período de la intervención (36,5% contra 44,8%; +8,3%; IC95% −8,3 hasta 24,8; P = 0,33).Conclusión: Los pacientes hospitalizados aquejados de infección por el VIH en Uganda occidental son muy susceptibles de sufrir una enfermedad grave o la muerte. Se precisan nuevas estrategias de mejora de la calidad que refuercen la práctica de las pruebas diagnósticas de infección por el VIH en los entornos con alta carga de morbilidad.