Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2261: 229-246, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33420993

ABSTRACT

Immunoprecipitation (IP) is commonly used upstream of mass spectrometry (MS) as an enrichment tool for low-abundant protein targets. However, several aspects of the classical IP procedure such as nonspecific protein binding to the isolation matrix, detergents or high salt concentrations in wash and elution buffers, and antibody chain contamination in elution fractions render it incompatible with downstream mass spectrometry analysis. Here, we discuss an improved IP-MS workflow that is designed to minimize sample prep time and these contaminants. The method employs biotinylated antibodies to the targets of interest and streptavidin magnetic beads that exhibit low background binding. In addition, alterations in the elution protocol and subsequent MS sample prep were made to reduce time and antibody leaching in the eluent, minimizing potential ion suppression effects and thereby maximizing detection of multiple target antigens and interacting proteins.


Subject(s)
Analytic Sample Preparation Methods , Immunoprecipitation , Proteins/analysis , Proteomics , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Animals , Biotinylation , Chromatography, Liquid , Humans , Workflow
2.
Methods Mol Biol ; 1295: 135-51, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25820720

ABSTRACT

Immunoprecipitation (IP) is commonly used upstream of mass spectrometry (MS) as an enrichment tool for low-abundant protein targets. However, several aspects of the classical IP procedure such as nonspecific protein binding to the isolation matrix, detergents or high salt concentrations in wash and elution buffers, and antibody chain contamination in elution fractions render it incompatible with downstream mass spectrometry analysis. Here, we discuss two IP workflows that are designed to minimize or eliminate these contaminants: the first employs biotinylated antibodies and streptavidin magnetic beads while the second method utilizes a traditional antibody that is oriented and cross-linked to Protein AG magnetic beads. Both modified magnetic supports have low background binding and both antibody immobilization strategies significantly reduce or eliminate antibody heavy and light chain contamination in the eluent, minimizing potential ion suppression effects and thereby maximizing detection of target antigens and interacting proteins.


Subject(s)
Immunoprecipitation , Mass Spectrometry , Proteins/chemistry , Immunoprecipitation/methods , Mass Spectrometry/methods
3.
J Proteome Res ; 9(1): 430-43, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19899826

ABSTRACT

Initiation and maintenance of several cancers including glioblastoma (GBM) may be driven by a small subset of cells called cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs may provide a repository of cells in tumor cell populations that are refractory to chemotherapeutic agents developed for the treatment of tumors. STAT3 is a key transcription factor associated with regulation of multiple stem cell types. Recently, a novel autocrine loop (IL-6/STAT3/HIF1alpha) has been observed in multiple tumor types (pancreatic, prostate, lung, and colon). The objective of this study was to probe perturbations of this loop in a glioblastoma cancer stem cell line (GSC11) derived from a human tumor by use of a JAK2/STAT3 phosphorylation inhibitor (WP1193), IL-6 stimulation, and hypoxia. A quantitative phosphoproteomic approach that employed phosphoprotein enrichment, chemical tagging with isobaric tags, phosphopeptide enrichment, and tandem mass spectrometry in a high-resolution instrument was applied. A total of 3414 proteins were identified in this study. A rapid Western blotting technique (<1 h) was used to confirm alterations in key protein expression and phosphorylation levels observed in the mass spectrometric experiments. About 10% of the phosphoproteins were linked to the IL-6 pathway, and the majority of remaining proteins could be assigned to other interlinked networks. By multiple comparisons between the sample conditions, we observed expected changes and gained novel insights into the contribution of each factor to the IL6/STAT3/HIF1alpha autocrine loop and the CSC response to perturbations by hypoxia, inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation, and IL-6 stimulation.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma/chemistry , Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit/metabolism , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Neoplastic Stem Cells/chemistry , Phosphoproteins/analysis , Proteome/analysis , STAT3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Blotting, Western , Chemokines/metabolism , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Humans , Hypoxia/metabolism , Models, Biological , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism , Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II/metabolism , Phosphopeptides/analysis , Phosphopeptides/metabolism , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , Phosphorylation , Proteome/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Tryptophan/metabolism
4.
Methods Mol Biol ; 424: 349-64, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18369874

ABSTRACT

Immunoprecipitation (IP) uses the specificity of antibodies to isolate target proteins (antigens) out of complex sample mixtures. Three different approaches for performing IP will be discussed; traditional (classical) method, oriented affinity method and direct affinity method. The traditional method of incubating the IP antibody with the sample and sequentially binding to Protein A or G agarose beads (resin) facilitates the most efficient target antigen recovery. However, this approach results in the target protein becoming contaminated with the IP antibody that can interfere with downstream analyses. The orientated affinity method uses Protein A or G beads to serve as an anchor to which the IP antibody is crosslinked thereby preventing the antibody from co-eluting with the target protein. Similarly, the direct affinity method also immobilizes the IP antibody except in this case it is directly attached to a chemically activated support. Both methods prevent co-elution of the IP antibody enabling reuse of the immunomatrix. All three approaches have unique advantages and can also be used for co-immunoprecipitation to study protein:protein interactions and investigate the functional proteome.


Subject(s)
Antibodies/chemistry , Immunoprecipitation/methods , Multiprotein Complexes/isolation & purification , Nerve Tissue Proteins/chemistry , Staphylococcal Protein A/chemistry , Animals , Antibodies/immunology , Humans , Multiprotein Complexes/chemistry , Multiprotein Complexes/immunology , Nerve Tissue Proteins/immunology , Staphylococcal Protein A/immunology
5.
J Cell Biochem ; 96(2): 314-29, 2005 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16088958

ABSTRACT

Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) is an immediate early gene induced by a variety of stimuli and its expression is stimulated by individual activation of Ras or Rho GTPases. Here we investigate the role of coordinate activation of Ras and Rho GTPases in the induction of COX-2. Individual expression of constitutively active Ras, RhoA, or Rac1 was capable of stimulating COX-2 expression in NIH3T3 cells, but co-expression of constitutively active RhoA with either constitutively active Ras or Rac1 was required for full stimulation of COX-2 expression. Serum growth factors differentially activated Ras, RhoA, and Rac1, which correlated with the activation of Raf-1, ERK, and c-Jun as well as with induction of COX-2. Inhibition of Ras significantly blocked the activation of Raf-1, ERK, and c-Jun and the stimulation of COX-2 expression in response to serum. In contrast, inhibition of Rho family GTPases partially blocked serum induction of ERK activation but had little effects on COX-2 expression. Both inhibitors of MEK (PD098059) and JNK (SP600125) inhibited serum induction of COX-2. PD98059 only inhibited constitutively active Ras-induced COX-2 expression, while SP600125 significantly inhibited both constitutively active Ras- and RhoA-induced COX-2 expression. Together, our data suggest that constitutively active oncogenic Ras and Rho coordinately stimulate COX-2 expression whereas transient activation of Ras but not RhoA or Rac1 mediates the induction of COX-2 in response to serum. Furthermore, ERK and JNK activation are both required for serum- and oncogenic Ras-mediated COX-2 expression whereas only JNK activation is required for oncogenic RhoA-mediated stimulation of COX-2 expression.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , ras Proteins/metabolism , rhoA GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , 3T3 Cells , Animals , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic/genetics , Growth Substances/blood , Growth Substances/pharmacology , Kinetics , Mice , Mutation/genetics , Signal Transduction , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/genetics , ras Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , ras Proteins/genetics , rhoA GTP-Binding Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , rhoA GTP-Binding Protein/genetics
6.
J Biomol Screen ; 9(4): 334-42, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15191650

ABSTRACT

Transcription factors are DNA-binding proteins that regulate the expression of specific genes by controlling transcription initiation. Two families of transcription factors, NFkappaB and AP-1, play pivotal roles in controlling important cellular processes ranging from normal cell growth and differentiation to apoptosis and cancer. Identifying changes in the DNA-binding activity of these factors is essential to understanding the regulation of these processes. We have developed a high-throughput DNA-based ELISA capable of monitoring activated levels of NFkappaB (p50 and p65) and AP-1 (c-Jun and c-Fos). This chemiluminescent assay utilizes a 96-well plate format, eliminating the throughput challenges imposed by traditional gel shift assays and exceeding the sensitivity and dynamic range of standard colorimetric detection systems. The sensitivity of this assay enables distinction between subtle as well as dramatic differences in the DNA-binding activity of these factors that result from the treatment of cells with various inhibitors or activating agents.


Subject(s)
Luminescent Measurements/methods , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Base Sequence , Cell Line , DNA/genetics , DNA/metabolism , Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , HeLa Cells , Humans , Mice , NF-kappa B/genetics , NF-kappa B/metabolism , NIH 3T3 Cells , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun/metabolism , Rats , Transcription Factor AP-1/genetics , Transcription Factor AP-1/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics
7.
J Biomed Biotechnol ; 2003(5): 291-298, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14688415

ABSTRACT

Immunoprecipitation (IP) and coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) are key techniques for studying protein-protein interactions. These methods utilize immobilized protein A or protein G to isolate antibody-bound target antigens. The main disadvantage of traditional immunoprecipitation and coimmunoprecipitation is that the conditions used to elute the precipitated antigen also release the antibody, contaminating the antigen and destroying the antibody support. To overcome these problems, we describe two methods to generate a reusable antibody support by cross-linking the antibody to immobilized protein A or protein G, or by coupling it directly to the resin. Our studies have demonstrated that the immobilization efficiency for the antibody coupling method was similar for several species of antibody. Furthermore, we illustrate that using both methods of antibody immobilization yields IP and co-IP results similar to traditional protocols but eliminate the antibody heavy and light chains contamination.

8.
J Biomed Biotechnol ; 2003(4): 249-255, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14615633

ABSTRACT

The human proteome project will demand faster, easier, and more reliable methods to isolate and purify protein targets. Membrane proteins are the most valuable group of proteins since they are the target for 70-80% of all drugs. Perbio Science has developed a protocol for the quick, easy, and reproducible isolation of integral membrane proteins from eukaryotic cells. This procedure utilizes a proprietary formulation to facilitate cell membrane disruption in a mild, nondenaturing environment and efficiently solubilizes membrane proteins. The technique utilizes a two-phase partitioning system that enables the class separation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic proteins. A variety of protein markers were used to investigate the partitioning efficiency of the membrane protein extraction reagents (Mem-PER) (Mem-PER is a registered trademark of Pierce Biotechnology, Inc) system. These included membrane proteins with one or more transmembrane spanning domains as well as peripheral and cytosolic proteins. Based on densitometry analyses of our Western blots, we obtained excellent solubilization of membrane proteins with less than 10% contamination of the hydrophobic fraction with hydrophilic proteins. Compared to other methodologies for membrane protein solubilization that use time-consuming protocols or expensive and cumbersome instrumentation, the Mem-PER reagents system for eukaryotic membrane protein extraction offers an easy, efficient, and reproducible method to isolate membrane proteins from mammalian and yeast cells.

9.
Anal Biochem ; 322(2): 164-9, 2003 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14596823

ABSTRACT

We have developed an affinity-precipitation technique to facilitate conducting glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays. The dehydrated immobilized glutathione resin format, when combined with microcentrifuge spin columns, is a powerful tool that enables the simultaneous performance of resin hydration, the binding of the GST fusion protein, and the pull-down step with the appropriate protein partner in a semihigh-throughput fashion (multiple samples processed at the same time). The entire assay process is shortened and recovery is enhanced when coupled with a spin-column format, providing a convenient way to study protein-protein interactions. We successfully tested the resin format/technique in three common pull-down applications utilizing radiolabeled, overexpressed, and activated endogenous interacting protein partners.


Subject(s)
Biochemistry/methods , Glutathione Transferase/analysis , Recombinant Proteins/analysis , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Centrifugation/instrumentation , Centrifugation/methods , DNA-Binding Proteins , Glutathione/chemistry , Glutathione Transferase/genetics , Glutathione Transferase/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Protein Biosynthesis , Protein Interaction Mapping/methods , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2 , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Sulfur Radioisotopes , Transcription, Genetic , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes/genetics , Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes/metabolism
10.
J Biochem Biophys Methods ; 57(2): 143-57, 2003 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12915006

ABSTRACT

Immunoprecipitation (IP) and coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) are key techniques for studying protein-protein interactions. These methods utilize immobilized Protein A or Protein G to isolate antibody-bound target antigens. The main disadvantage of traditional IP and co-IP is that the conditions used to elute the precipitated antigen also release the antibody thus contaminating the antigen and destroying the antibody support. To overcome these problems, we describe two methods to generate a reusable antibody support by cross-linking the antibody to immobilized Protein A or Protein G, or by coupling it directly to the resin (see Scheme 1). Antibody cross-linking can be done in 1 h while antibody coupling requires 4 h. IP or co-IP is accomplished by incubating the antibody resin with the protein sample. Washes and elutions are carried out in a spin column to reduce resin loss and decrease assay time. Target proteins are eluted with 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.8) and the resin-bound antibody is re-equilibrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for reuse. Our studies have demonstrated that the immobilization efficiency for the antibody coupling method was similar for several species of antibody. Furthermore, we illustrate that using both methods of antibody immobilization yield IP and co-IP results similar to traditional protocols but eliminate the antibody heavy and light chain contamination.


Subject(s)
Antigen-Antibody Complex/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Nerve Tissue Proteins/immunology , Precipitin Tests/methods , Protein Interaction Mapping/methods , Proteomics/methods , Staphylococcal Protein A/immunology , Animals , Antigen-Antibody Complex/immunology , Chickens , Goats , Humans , Mice , Protein Binding , Rabbits , Rats , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Species Specificity
11.
Biotechniques ; 33(6): 1354-8, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12503324

ABSTRACT

The ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) is a widely used method for the detection and quantification of specific mRNA transcripts in a complex mixture of total RNA or mRNA molecules. While exhibiting many advantages over other RNA detection methods, RPAs are traditionally performed using radiolabeled probes that often require gel purification steps and lengthy exposure times to visualize results. Moreover, these probes can only be used for 1-2 weeks because of their short isotopic half-life and radiolysis. We report a method that improves the traditional RPA by replacing radiolabeled probes with biotinylated probes and lengthy exposure times with quick, streptavidin/HRP-based chemiluminescent detection technology. Biotinylated probes can be used without get purification and are stable for years, as opposed to weeks. Most importantly, our streptavidin/HRP-based chemiluminescent technology enables us to achieve sensitivity results similar to radioactive RPAs and to detect multiple transcripts in a single sample more efficiently. Furthermore, this new protocol addresses and eliminates the one major drawback unique to using biotinylated probes in chemiluminescent RPAs: a confounding artifact, not seen when running radioactive RPAs but commonly detected when using certain biotinylated rare message probes.


Subject(s)
Biotinylation , Luminescent Measurements , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , RNA Probes , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Ribonucleases/metabolism , Actins/genetics , Artifacts , Drug Stability , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Genes, myc , Horseradish Peroxidase , Membranes, Artificial , Osmolar Concentration , Phosphorus Radioisotopes/analysis , RNA Probes/chemistry , RNA, Double-Stranded/analysis , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Scintillation Counting , Sensitivity and Specificity , Streptavidin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...