Real Clinical Practice of Combined Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, has been increasingly administered in combination with chemotherapy to patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study aimed to determine how patients with extensive disease (ED) -SCLC responded to atezolizumab with chemotherapy and found factors affecting long-term response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study focused on patients with SCLC who were treated with a combination of atezolizumab and chemotherapy in Japan between 2019 and 2023. Patient information and tumor response were analyzed, along with adverse events. We compared data and estimated survival probabilities. RESULTS: In our clinical trial, 95 patients with SCLC who received this treatment had a median progression-free survival of 6.0 months and a median overall survival of 15.0 months. Immune-related adverse events were observed in 13.7% of the patients, with grade 3 or higher in 5.3%. The efficacy and immune-related adverse events associated with this treatment regimen were comparable to those reported in previous clinical trials. Progression-free survival >2 years was observed in a small number of patients (5.3%). CONCLUSION: Our research will offer important insights for the future care of patients with extensive-stage SCLC by utilizing atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Accumulation and confirmation of clinical practice results will have important implications for the future implementation of this therapy.

Disseminated cryptococcosis in a geriatric man following high-dose systemic steroid therapy for severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

An 88-year-old man was treated with high-dose systemic steroid therapy for COVID-19 and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia months before admission to the hospital because of swelling and redness in his left arm. Cryptococcus neoformans was detected in his blood sample on day eight of admission, and despite antifungal therapy, he died on day 43. Clinicians should be vigilant about the risk of prolonged immunosuppression as a side effect of high-dose systemic steroid usage for COVID-19.

Atezolizumab for EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: An Observation Study in Ibaraki Group (ATTENTION-IBARAKI).

BACKGROUND/AIM: Atezolizumab, an anti-programed death-ligand 1 monoclonal antibody, targets programed death-ligand 1 expressed on cancer cells and antigen-presenting cells and is now commonly used in combination with chemotherapy. We conducted a study to clarify the efficacy of atezolizumab in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated patients who are considered less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received atezolizumab-containing therapy at 11 hospitals from April 2018 to March 2023 was performed. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival and overall survival in 33 EGFR-mutated patients treated with atezolizumab monotherapy were 2.0 and 9.0 months, respectively, and those in 19 patients who received combined atezolizumab plus chemotherapy were 12.0 and 17.0 months, respectively. When comparing EGFR-mutated and EGFR-negative patients after propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival between the two groups, whether atezolizumab monotherapy or combined atezolizumab plus chemotherapy. Among EGFR-mutated patients, being male was a significant favorable factor in both atezolizumab treatment groups. None of the EGFR-mutated patients had grade 5 immune-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Efficacy of atezolizumab in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients could be comparable to that for EGFR-negative patients. To prolong the survival of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients, appropriate selection and sequencing of EGFR for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-tumor agents, and anti-angiogenic agents are important.

Atezolizumab Monotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: An Observational Study in Ibaraki Group (ATTENTION-IBARAKI).

BACKGROUND/AIM: Atezolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressed on cancer cells derived from various organs and antigen-presenting cells and is currently commonly used in combination with chemotherapy. We conducted a study to clarify the current status of response to atezolizumab monotherapy in clinical practice and clarify the factors that contribute to long-term response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with atezolizumab monotherapy from April 2018 to March 2023 at 11 Hospitals. RESULTS: The 147 patients evaluated had a progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.0 months and an overall survival of 7.0 months. Immune-related adverse events of any grade were observed in 13 patients (8.8%), grade 3 or higher in nine patients (6.1%), and grade 5 with pulmonary toxicity in one patient (0.7%). Favorable factors related to PFS were 'types of NSCLC other than adenocarcinoma'. Favorable factors for overall survival were 'performance status 0-1' and 'treatment lines up to 3'. There were 16 patients (10.9%) with PFS >1 year. No characteristic clinical findings were found in these 16 patients compared to the remaining 131 patients. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and immune-related adverse events of NSCLC patients associated with atezolizumab monotherapy were comparable to those of previous clinical trial results. Knowledge of characteristics of patients who are most likely to benefit from atezolizumab monotherapy is a crucial step towards implementing appropriate prescribing.

Randomized, Phase II study of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab versus pemetrexed alone after treatment with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer: TORG (thoracic oncology research group) 1321.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin plus pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed is an efficacious platinum combination regimen for advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data regarding the addition of bevacizumab, especially in maintenance treatment, are insufficient. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included: no prior chemotherapy; advanced, non-squamous, NSCLC; performance status ≤1; and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-negative. Patients (N = 108) received induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for four cycles, and tumor response was needed to confirm four-week response duration. Patients with at least stable disease were randomized to pemetrexed/bevacizumab or pemetrexed alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after induction chemotherapy. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts of peripheral blood samples were also analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients each were randomized to the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group and the pemetrexed alone group. PFS was significantly better in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group than in the pemetrexed alone group (7.0 vs. 5.4 months, hazard ratio: 0.56 [0.34-0.93], log-rank p = 0.023). In patients with partial response to induction therapy, median overall survival was 23.3 months in the pemetrexed alone group and 29.6 months in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group (log-rank p = 0.077). Pretreatment monocytic (M)-MDSC counts tended to be greater in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group with poor PFS than in those with good PFS (p = 0.0724). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed as maintenance therapy prolonged PFS in patients with untreated, advanced, non-squamous NSCLC. Furthermore, an early response to induction therapy and pretreatment M-MDSC counts may be related to the survival benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed.

Post-progression survival after atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer has a significant impact on overall survival.

BACKGROUND: The effect of first-line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) may be significantly influenced by subsequent therapy for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), and OS of ED-SCLC patients treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line therapy. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 57 patients with relapsed ED-SCLC treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (AteCE) as first-line chemotherapy between August 2019 and September 2020. The respective correlations between PFS-OS and PPS-OS following first-line AteCE treatment were examined at the individual patient level. RESULTS: Spearman's rank correlation analysis and linear regression analysis showed that PPS strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.93, p < 0.05, R2  = 0.85) and that PFS moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.55, p < 0.05, R2  = 0.28). Performance status at relapse (0-1/≥2), number of cycles of atezolizumab maintenance therapy (<3/≥3), and platinum rechallenge chemotherapy all significantly positively correlated with PPS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Upon comparing OS-PFS and OS-PPS in this patient population, OS and PPS were found to have a stronger correlation. These results suggest that performance status at relapse, atezolizumab maintenance, or chemotherapy rechallenge could affect PPS.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Lung Cancer With a New Real-time Tumor Tracking System.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Suppression of respiratory movement is crucial for safe and effective stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). SyncTraX FX4 is a novel device for synchronous respiratory irradiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT using SyncTraX FX4 for patients with lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated with SBRT using SyncTraX FX4 between November 2017 and August 2020 were included. In all cases, fiducial markers were inserted into the lung, and the total dose administered was 55 or 60 Gy, depending on the distance from the central region of the lung. Acute and late toxicities were reported, and local control, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: We evaluated 16 patients and 17 sites. The median follow-up period was 14.4 months. In both the acute and late phases, one patient experienced grade 3 radiation pneumonitis; however, grade 4 or higher toxicities were not observed. There was no local recurrence during the observation period, and the overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival at 2 years were 54.6%, 85.1%, and 33.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SBRT with SyncTraX FX4 can provide safe and effective treatment for lung cancer patients in poor condition.

Prognostic Implication of PD-L1 Expression on Osimertinib Treatment for EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Real-world data on the clinical outcomes of first-line osimertinib treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is lacking. This study aimed to reveal the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of osimertinib as first-line therapy in clinical practice settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first-line therapy across 12 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and March 2020. RESULTS: Among 158 enrolled patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 68%, and the estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=14.5-19.7]. Subgroup analysis showed that PFS in the group with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was significantly shorter than that in groups with low or no PD-L1 expression (10.1 vs. 16.1 vs. 19.0 months; p=0.03). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that high PD-L1 expression was the only independent adverse prognostic factor of osimertinib outcome related to PFS (hazard ratio=2.71; 95%CI=1.26-5.84; p=0.01). In terms of anti-tumor response, there was no statistically significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and the ORR (67% vs. 76% vs. 65%; p=0.51). No significant correlation was also found between PD-L1 and the incidence of de novo resistance to osimertinib (p=0.39). CONCLUSION: Although PD-L1 expression was not associated with either the ORR or frequency of de novo resistance, high PD-L1 expression could be an independent adverse prognostic factor related to PFS in osimertinib treatment.

Clinical Outcomes of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Surgically Resected High-Grade Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Data on the clinical outcomes of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resected high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) (large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HGNEC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with surgically resected HGNEC at five institutions in Japan between January 2006 and May 2016. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were enrolled. Among them, 65 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Four patients who participated in clinical trials were excluded; the remaining 61 patients were included in the study. Fifty-six patients received adjuvant small-cell lung cancer-based chemotherapy. Twenty-five of 29 patients who relapsed after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy received chemotherapy. The most commonly administered chemotherapy agent was amrubicin. The 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 55.2% and 66.8%, respectively. The median relapse-free and overall survival times for the 25 patients who received chemotherapy after relapse were 12.9 and 27.5 months, respectively. Among them, 22 relapsed within 2 years. Patients who received platinum-doublet chemotherapy after relapse tended to have better time to progression disease and overall survival than those who received single-agent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with HGNEC received small-cell lung cancer-based regimens as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Those who relapsed after adjuvant chemotherapy were mainly treated with amrubicin. Our findings suggest that platinum-doublet chemotherapy tends to improve the time to progression disease and overall survival in patients who relapse after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Pretreatment glasgow prognostic score predicts survival among patients administered first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide for small cell lung cancer.

Background: There are no established predictive biomarkers for the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate whether the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and body mass index (BMI) can predict the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy in patients with extensive-disease SCLC. Methods: We reviewed data from 84 patients who received first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy for SCLC at nine Japanese institutions between August 2019 and May 2021. Further, we evaluated the prognostic value of the GPS, NLR, and BMI. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, the GPS, NLR, and BMI consisted of C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, and body weight and height, respectively. Results: The response rate was 72.6% (95% confidence interval: 63.0-82.1%). The median PFS and OS from the initiation of treatment were 5.4 (95% CI: 4.9-5.9) months and 15.4 (95% CI: 11.4-16.8) months, respectively. The GPS independently predicted the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide treatment, as a favorable GPS (GPS 0-1) was correlated with significantly better PFS and OS rates compared to a poor GPS (GPS 2) (PFS: 5.8 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.0005; OS: 16.5 vs. 8.4 months, p<0.0001). Conclusions: This is the first analysis to evaluate the association between the GPS, NLR, and BMI and the treatment effectiveness of survival among patients receiving first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy for SCLC. Among patients receiving this treatment for SCLC, GPS was significantly associated with the PFS and OS rates, suggesting that GPS might be useful for evaluating therapeutic outcomes in these patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge Treatment in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Drug-Sensitive EGFR Mutations.

Background and Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective first-line chemotherapeutic agents for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. However, the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment is not sufficient in elderly patients (over 75 years of age) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Materials and Methods: Between April 2008 and December 2015, we analyzed 78 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations with first-line EGFR-TKI treatment at four Japanese institutions. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety profiles of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R mutation). Results: Twenty-two patients in the cohort were rechallenged with EGFR-TKI. The median age was 79.5 years (range 75-87 years). Despite the fact that it was a retrospective analysis, even with EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment the response rate was 23%, progression-free survival was 5.3 months, and overall survival was 14.4 months. Common adverse events included rash acneiform, paronychia, diarrhea, and anorexia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Due to the occurrence of adverse events of grade 2 or more, dose reduction was performed in 15 (68.2%) of 22 cases. Conclusions: EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations was one of the limited, safe and effective treatment options for elderly EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.

A prospective, phase II trial of monotherapy with low-dose afatinib for patients with EGFR, mutation-positive, non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic oncology research group 1632.

OBJECTIVES: Afatinib is an effective treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the toxicity associated with this agent often leads to dose modifications. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and plasma concentrations of low dose afatinib monotherapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial involving treatment-naïve patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. From March 2017 to September 2018, 53 patients were enrolled from 21 institutions in Japan. Patients initially received afatinib 20 mg/day orally. For patients in whom the tumor progressed within stable disease, the investigators were able to increase the afatinib dose (10 mg increments). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The threshold and expected median PFS was 9.2 and 13.8 months, respectively. Additionally, the correlation of the plasma concentration of low-dose afatinib with clinical outcome and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 70 years (range: 37-85 years); 28 patients (52.8%) were females. The median duration of the follow-up was 20.8 months. The median PFS, and overall survival were 12.6 months (90% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7-14.3 months), and not reached, respectively. The primary endpoint was met. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 66.0% (95% CI: 51.7-78.5) and 92.5% (95% CI: 81.8-97.9), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 12 patients (22.6%), including diarrhea in four patients (7.5%). The rate of adverse events was lower than that observed in previous phase III studies of 40 mg afatinib. CONCLUSION: Based on its promising clinical efficacy and tolerability profile, monotherapy with low-dose afatinib should become one of the standard therapies for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score predicts survival among patients with high PD-L1 expression administered first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are no established biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. In this study, we investigated whether the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and body mass index (BMI) can be used to evaluate the effect of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who express high levels of PD-L1. METHODS: We reviewed data from 142 patients with high PD-L1 expression who underwent first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC at six Japanese institutions between February 2017 and June 2019 and assessed the prognostic value of the GPS, NLR, and BMI. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The GPS, NLR, and BMI were calculated using C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, and body weight and height, respectively. RESULTS: The GPS independently predicted the first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy efficacy, as a good GPS (GPS 0-1) was associated with a significantly better PFS and OS compared to a poor GPS (GPS 2) (PFS: 11.8 vs. 2.9 months, p < 0.0001; OS: not reached vs. 8.3 months, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, BMI independently predicted efficacy, as patients with high BMI (BMI ≥21.4) exhibited significantly better OS compared to those with low BMI (BMI <21.4) (OS: not reached vs. 14.1 months, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC, the GPS is significantly correlated with both PFS and OS, and BMI with OS, indicating that they could be used to predict treatment outcome in these patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the relationship among the GPS, NLR, and BMI and survival among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC.

Post-Progression Survival Influences Overall Survival among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the impact of first-line treatment on overall survival (OS) may be influenced by subsequent therapies. Thus, using patient-level data, we assessed the relationships of progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS) with OS among patients with high-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC. METHODS: We reviewed data from 133 patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC at 6 Japanese centers between February 2017 and December 2018. The correlations of PFS and PPS with OS were evaluated at the patient level. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient revealed that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.76, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.65), while PFS was only moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.71, p < 0.05, and R2 = 0.4). Furthermore, PPS was significantly associated with performance status at the end of pembrolizumab monotherapy, as well as the use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy after pembrolizumab monotherapy (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC, PPS was more strongly correlated with OS, relative to the relationship between PFS and OS. Therefore, subsequent treatment appears to significantly influence OS in patients with disease progression following first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Prognostic value of morphological characteristics assessed by CT scan in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab is known to demonstrate superior overall survival compared with docetaxel in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is reported to predict the outcome of treatment by nivolumab in lung cancer patients. However, the significance of the morphological characteristics of chest computed tomography (CT) as predictors of nivolumab efficacy for advanced NSCLC patients remains unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective trial from April 2013 to March 2017, to assess the significance of CT morphological characteristics as predictors of nivolumab efficacy for advanced NSCLC patients. A total of 78 NSCLC patients pretreated with nivolumab were enrolled. A chest radiologist used chest CT to assess the following morphological characteristics of each patient's main tumor and intrathoracic status prior to nivolumab treatment; interstitial septal thickening, peritumoral ground-glass opacity, spiculated margin, air bronchogram, cavity or necrosis, adjacent organ invasion, bulky lymph node, and accumulation of small lymph nodes. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 60 (77%) patients were male and 72 (92%) had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. The objective response rates of male patients and heavy smokers were significantly higher than those of female patients and light or never smokers, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified light or never smoking, poor PS, histological type of squamous cell carcinoma, and interstitial septal thickening as independent negative predictors of progression free survival (PFS). CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial septal thickening was a significant and independent predictor of PFS in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Interstitial septal thickening is an independent predictor of progression free survival in non-small lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The current study reveals the significance of morphological characteristics obtained via chest computed tomography as a predictor of nivolumab efficacy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Treatment of Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With Uncommon EGFR Mutations in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To describe real clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review from 15 medical institutes that cover a population of three million people from April 2008 to March 2019. RESULTS: There were 102 patients with uncommon EGFR mutation. Progression-free survival (PFS) tended to be longer in patients receiving afatinib compared with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PFS in patients treated with afatinib or osimertinib was significantly longer than in patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib (p=0.030). Multivariate analysis also revealed the contribution of afatinib or osimertinib to increased survival. In patients with exon 20 insertions, chemotherapy was efficacious. CONCLUSION: In treating patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, our results indicate longer-term survival might be achieved with second-generation or later TKIs and cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in previously treated elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is not clear whether its effectiveness and tolerability in elderly patients are equivalent to those in younger patients. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC who had previously received other treatments. METHODS: We included 96 elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with advanced NSCLC treated with S-1 alone as a subsequent-line treatment at 12 medical facilities between January 2005 and March 2018 in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patients, response to S-1 monotherapy, and adverse events (AEs) were investigated, retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 68 male and 28 female patients (median age, 78 [range: 75-86] years) were analyzed. In elderly patients who were treated with S-1 monotherapy as a subsequent-line treatment, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 8.3%, 43.8%, 3.4 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Observed AEs included anorexia, anemia, nausea, fatigue, reduced platelet count, and skin hyperpigmentation. Treatment-related death was observed in one patient because of pneumonitis. In patients who experienced no progressive disease, subsequent-line S-1 alone was associated with longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible as a subsequent-line treatment in elderly patients who were previously treated for NSCLC, and it produces results. S-1 monotherapy could be one of the treatment choices for elderly patients with previously treated NSCLC.

A phase I and extension study of S-1 and carboplatin for previously untreated patients aged 75 years or more with advanced non-small cell lung cancer -TCOG 1101.

PURPOSE: Combination carboplatin and S-1 is active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on this combination for elderly patients with NSCLC are insufficient. METHODS: Eligibility criteria were no prior chemotherapy, Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, performance status 0-1, age ≥ 75 years, and adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal functions. Carboplatin was administered on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally, twice a day, between days 1 and 14, repeated every 3 weeks. In phase I, the primary purpose was determination of the recommended dose. Starting doses of carboplatin and S-1 were area under the curve (AUC) of 4 and 80 mg/m2/day, respectively. In the extension study, the effects and tolerability of this combination therapy of recommended dose were confirmed. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were entered into phase I and 14 patients were entered into the extension study. The recommended doses for this drug combination are AUC 5 for carboplatin and 80 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks for S-1. With carboplatin and S-1 combination therapy at the recommended dose, the response rate was 30.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-54%] and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI 68-99%). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended doses for this combination therapy are carboplatin AUC 5 and S-1 80 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks, and this combination is effective with tolerable toxicities for advanced NSCLC patients ≥ 75 years old.

Real Clinical Practice in ALK-rearranged NSCLC Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To describe real clinical outcomes when using systemic therapy to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review from April 2008 to March 2019 sourced from 16 medical institutes that cover a population of three million people. RESULTS: There were 129 ALK rearranged NSCLC patients. Among them, 103 patients including 40 recurrent disease cases received ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy. Our treatment results were comparable to previously reported clinical trials and clinical practice studies. First-line alectinib, treatment sequence of ALK-TKI followed by another ALK-TKI, and pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy contributed to the outcome of treatment. CONCLUSION: By arrangement of treatment such as treatment sequence of ALK-TKI and chemotherapy regimen, it might be possible to obtain a treatment outcome almost equivalent to those of clinical trials even in real clinical practice.