Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in colorectal surgery reduces anastomotic leakage and costs: a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) account for most postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. The aim of this retrospective trial was to investigate whether perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) reduces these complications and to provide a cost-effectiveness model for elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: All patients operated between November 2016 and March 2020 were included in our analysis. Patients in the primary cohort (PC) received SDD and those in the historical control cohort (CC) did not receive SDD. In the case of rectal/sigmoid resection, SDD was also applied via a transanally placed Foley catheter (TAFC) for 48 h postoperatively. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to identify risk factors for AL and SSI. Costs were calculated based on German diagnosis-related group (DRG) fees per case. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients (154 per cohort) with a median age of 62.6 years (IQR 52.5-70.8) were analyzed. AL was observed in ten patients (6.5%) in the PC and 23 patients (14.9%) in the CC (OR 0.380, 95% CI 0.174-0.833; P = 0.016). SSI occurred in 14 patients (9.1%) in the PC and 30 patients in the CC (19.5%), representing a significant reduction in our SSI rate (P = 0.009). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that SDD is highly effective in saving costs with a number needed to treat of 12 for AL and 10 for SSI. CONCLUSION: SDD significantly reduces the incidence of AL and SSI and saves costs for the general healthcare system.

Clinical pharmacists' interventions across German hospitals: results from a repetitive cross-sectional study.

Background Pharmacists' interventions (PI) are suitable to improve medication safety and optimise patient outcome. However, in Germany, clinical pharmacy services are not yet available nationwide. Aim To gain prospective data on the extent and the composition of routine PI with special focus on intervention rates among German hospital pharmacists during two intervention weeks. Methods Within a repetitive cross-sectional study, clinical pharmacists documented all PIs on five days during a one-month period (intervention week) in 2017 and 2019 using the validated online-database ADKA-DokuPIK. Additionally, data regarding the supply structure/level of medical care, the extent of clinical pharmacy services and their professional experience were collected. All data were anonymised before analysis. Results In total, 2,282 PI from 62 pharmacists (2017) and 2578 PI from 52 pharmacists (2019) were entered. Intervention rate increased from 27.5 PI/100 patient days in 2017 to 38.5 PI/100 patient days in 2019 (p = 0.0097). Frequency of clinical pharmacy services on a daily basis significantly increased from 60% (2017) to 83% (2019). Reasons for PIs from the categories "drugs" (e.g. indication, choice, documentation/transcription) and "dose" were most common in both intervention weeks. The vast majority of underlying medication errors in both intervention weeks were categorised as "error, no harm" (80.3 vs. 78.6%), while the proportion of errors which did not reach the patient, doubled to 39.8% in IW-2019. Conclusion Regular and daily clinical pharmacy services become more established in Germany and clinical pharmacists are increasingly involved in solving drug related problems proactively and early during the medication management process.

[Change of strategy to minimally invasive esophagectomy-Results at a certified center]. / Strategiewechsel zur minimal-invasiven Ösophagektomie ­ Ergebnisse an einem zertifizierten Zentrum.

BACKGROUND: There are indications that robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) can reduce the morbidity compared with the conventional operative technique. OBJECTIVE: A comparative analysis of a single-center change in strategy of the standard from open esophagectomy to RAMIE with perioperative, enteral, selective bowel decontamination (SBD) was carried out. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patient and morbidity data after elective RAMIE treated according to the novel standard management between July 2018 and September 2020 were compared retrospectively with an historical control cohort after open esophagectomy between January 2014 and June 2018. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients could be analyzed in both groups after PSM. Approximately two thirds of the operations were carried out due to an adenocarcinoma and one third due to a squamous cell carcinoma. The median number of resected lymph nodes was 22 and 21, respectively. In the RAMIE group the intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy was performed using a circular stapler with a diameter of ≥28 mm in 97%, whereas a 25 mm stapler was used in 90% in the control group. The operative time was longer (median 490min vs. 339 min, p < 0.001) but in contrast blood loss (median 300ml vs. 500 ml, p < 0.001), anastomotic leaks (8.0% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.004), surgical site infections (4.0% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.008) and pulmonary complication rates (29.3% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.045) as well as the median hospital stay (14 days vs. 20 days, p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality were significantly reduced compared with the open control group (4.0% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: A consistent change of the perioperative management including RAMIE and SBD can lead to a stable reduction of morbidity without compromising oncological radicalness.

Nationwide evaluation of day-to-day clinical pharmacists' interventions in German hospitals.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the extent and diversity of nationwide data from clinical pharmacists' interventions (PIs) in German hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. DATA SOURCE: The ADKA-DokuPIK German database, a national anonymous self-reported Internet-based documentation system for routine PIs as well as for medication errors reported by German hospital pharmacists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data sets from ADKA-DokuPIK entered between January 2009 and December 2012 were analyzed descriptively. A total of 27,610 PIs were entered, mainly by ward-based clinical pharmacists (82.5%). Most of the PIs were performed on surgical wards (37.8%), followed by anesthesiology/intensive care unit/intermediate care unit and internal medicine. The most prevalent therapeutic subgroup that was the trigger for the PIs was antibacterials for systemic use (13.9%), followed by antithrombotic agents, analgesics, drugs for acid-related disorders, and agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system. About a quarter of interventions (23.4%) were performed due to inappropriate use of drugs, followed by use of a wrong dose or administration interval (22.1%), resulting in the most frequently taken actions of change of dose, change of drug, and drug stopped/paused (withheld). Altogether, the implementation rate of the PIs was 85.5%. Underlying medication errors were predominantly classified as "error, no harm" according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. CONCLUSION: For the first time in a European country, our findings show the scope of clinical pharmacist involvement in patient care in daily clinical practice and demonstrate the usefulness and importance of their proactive interventions in the prevention of hazards and risks for hospital inpatients.