Recruitment into Academic Neurosurgery Using a Model for Successful Cross-Campus Research Collaboration: A Premedical Student Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Recruitment of diverse and talented students to the field of neurosurgery is key to its continued growth and scientific advancement. Barriers, including poor perceptions and lack of early exposure, can impact recruitment and have been compounded by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the impact of an inaugural Neurosurgery Research Consortium meeting on premedical students, assessing whether this exposure generated interest and improved perceptions of a career in neurosurgery. METHODS: Premedical students were recruited to virtually attend an inaugural Neurosurgery Research Consortium developed by the affiliated medical school's American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) Student Chapter. Questionnaires were distributed to students before and after the meeting to assess student demographics and perceptions of neurosurgery. RESULTS: A total of 54 students attended the meeting, with general interest in neurosurgery, medicine, and research opportunities being the primary factors for attendance. Following the research meeting, we found that students perceived neurosurgeons to be friendlier and more approachable, with a more positive quality of life (QoL). Overall perceptions of neurosurgery improved after the meeting, but perceptions among racial and ethnic minority students did not significantly change in the areas of diversity, inclusion, and equity. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest recruitment strategies targeting undergraduate students may improve their perception of neurosurgery as a career, and may mitigate some barriers to entry. These strategies are cost effective and easily replicable, making an easily implementable approach to provide direct insight into neurosurgery for future medical students while also promoting academic efforts in the field of neurosurgery.

In-hospital outcomes and readmission in older adults treated with percutaneous coronary intervention for stable ischemic heart disease.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) in older adults requires a meticulous assessment of procedural risks and benefits, but contemporary data on outcomes in this population is lacking. Therefore, we examined the risk of near-term readmission, bleeding, and mortality in high-risk cohort of older adults undergoing inpatient PCI for SIHD. METHODS: We analyzed the National Readmissions Database from 2017 to 2018 to identify index hospitalizations in which PCI was performed for SIHD. Patients were stratified into those ≥ 75 years old (older adults) and those < 75 years old. The primary outcome was 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charge. RESULTS: A total of 74,516 patients underwent inpatient PCI for SIHD, of whom 24,075 were older adults. Older adult patients had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.68-2.38), intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.24-3.34), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.43-2.07) during index hospitalization, with longer LOS and in-hospital charge. Older adults also experienced a higher hazard of 90-day readmission for any cause (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.57-1.66) and cardiovascular causes (HR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.77-1.91). CONCLUSION: Older adults undergoing inpatient PCI for SIHD were at increased risk for in-hospital mortality, periprocedural morbidities, higher cost, and readmissions compared with younger adults. Understanding these differences may improve shared decision-making for patients with SIHD being considered for PCI.