ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of ethnic groups within the antenatal population in central Manchester and thereby ensure that the haemoglobinopathy service was targeting the correct population and their needs. Ethnic data collection records of 6718 patients were analysed over a 7 month period. Of these 62.3% stated that they were White, 13.2% Asian, 7.9% Black, 3.8% Chinese or 'other ethnic groups' and 12.7% gave no information about their ethnic background. A subset of 1144 patients were screened for haemoglobinopathies over a 1 month period. The incidence of haemoglobinopathies within the screened population was 2.62%, and comprised 0.69% beta thalassaemia trait, 1.22% sickle cell trait, 0.43% haemoglobin C trait and 0.26% haemoglobin D trait. The total incidence of haemoglobinopathies was highest within the Black population (18.2%), followed by the no information group (5.6%), Asian (3.35%) and white (0.26%). The high proportion of ethnic minorities and the significant carrier frequency in the no information group, support our view that non-selective screening should be offered to the antenatal population of central Manchester.
Subject(s)
Hemoglobinopathies/diagnosis , Hemoglobinopathies/ethnology , Mass Screening , Prenatal Diagnosis , England/epidemiology , Female , Gene Frequency , Hemoglobinopathies/blood , Hemoglobins/analysis , Heterozygote , Humans , Incidence , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The Bio-Rad Variant Haemoglobin Testing System is an automated analyser which uses the principle of cation exchange high performance liquid chromatography. This evaluation was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of the instrument as a screening mechanism to assist in the diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies. The ability to quantify haemoglobins A2 and F and to 'flag' other haemoglobin variants was tested. Within-batch precision was excellent and between-batch precision was good. Linearity and sensitivity compared favourably with the manufacturer's published ranges. The level of carry-over for haemoglobins F, S and A was less than 0.25%. The mean carry-over for haemoglobin A2 was 2.08%. This higher figure reflected the smaller absolute difference between the high and low samples for this parameter. The instrument never failed to indicate the presence of an abnormal haemoglobin in 271 selected samples. The instrument was reliable throughout the evaluation and at no time was a run aborted.