ENSEMBLE PLUS: final results of shorter ocrelizumab infusion from a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Ocrelizumab is an approved intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety profile and patient preference for conventional versus shorter ocrelizumab infusions were investigated in the ENSEMBLE PLUS study. METHODS: ENSEMBLE PLUS was a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (NCT03085810), comparing outcomes in patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting MS receiving ocrelizumab 600 mg over the approved 3.5-h (conventional) versus 2-h (shorter) infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first randomized dose (RD); the secondary endpoint included IRR frequency at subsequent RDs. RESULTS: At first RD, the number of patients with an IRR in the conventional (101/373; 27.1%) versus shorter (107/372; 28.8%) infusion group was similar (difference, stratified estimates [95% CI]: 1.9% [- 4.4, 8.2]). Most IRRs (conventional: 99.4%; shorter: 97.7%) were mild/moderate. IRR frequency decreased over the course of RDs; three patients discontinued from the shorter infusion arm but continued with conventional infusion. Overall, > 98% of IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups. Pre-randomization throat irritation was predictive of future throat irritation as an IRR symptom. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were consistent with the known ocrelizumab safety profile. On completion of ENSEMBLE PLUS, most patients chose to remain on (95%) or switch to (80%) shorter infusion. CONCLUSION: ENSEMBLE PLUS demonstrates the safety and tolerability of shorter ocrelizumab infusions. Most patients remained on/switched to shorter infusion after unblinding; IRRs did not strongly influence patient decisions. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Substudy of ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810). REGISTRATION: March 21, 2017.

Efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with suboptimal response to prior disease-modifying therapies: A primary analysis from the phase 3b CASTING single-arm, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Using the treatment goal of "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA) incorporating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) re-baselining, we aimed to assess the efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with a prior suboptimal response, defined by MRI or relapse criteria, to one or two disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS: CASTING was a prospective, international, multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 3 trial (NCT02861014). Patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≤ 4.0, with discontinued prior DMT of ≥6 months duration due to suboptimal disease control) received intravenous ocrelizumab 600 mg every 24 weeks for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was NEDA (defined as absence of relapses, disability progression, and inflammatory MRI measures, with prespecified MRI re-baselining at Week 8) over 96 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 680 patients were enrolled, 167 (24.6%) based on MRI activity only. At Week 96, 74.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.3-78.0, n/N = 492/658) of patients had NEDA. NEDA was highest among patients enrolled due to MRI activity alone (80.6% [95% CI 68.6-89.6], n/N = 50/62) versus those enrolled for relapse (75.1% [95% CI 69.0-80.6], n/N = 172/229) or for relapse with MRI (70.5% [95% CI 60.0-79.0], n/N = 74/105). NEDA across subgroups was highest in patients with a baseline EDSS score <2.5 (77.2% [95% CI 72.8-81.2], n/N = 315/408). NEDA was higher in patients receiving one prior DMT (77.6% [95% CI 73.2-81.6], n/N = 312/402) versus two prior DMTs (70.3% [95% CI 64.3-75.8], n/N = 180/256). CONCLUSIONS: In patients switching therapy due to suboptimal disease control, treatment with ocrelizumab led to an overall high NEDA rate across a wide range of disease-related and demographic subgroups, regardless of prior treatment background, with no new safety signals detected.

Micro-structurally detailed model of a therapeutic hydrogel injectate in a rat biventricular cardiac geometry for computational simulations.

Biomaterial injection-based therapies have showed cautious success in restoration of cardiac function and prevention of adverse remodelling into heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI). However, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Computational studies utilised simplified representations of the therapeutic myocardial injectates. Wistar rats underwent experimental infarction followed by immediate injection of polyethylene glycol hydrogel in the infarct region. Hearts were explanted, cryo-sectioned and the region with the injectate histologically analysed. Histological micrographs were used to reconstruct the dispersed hydrogel injectate. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data from a healthy rat were used to obtain an end-diastolic biventricular geometry which was subsequently adjusted and combined with the injectate model. The computational geometry of the injectate exhibited microscopic structural details found the in situ. The combination of injectate and cardiac geometry provides realistic geometries for multiscale computational studies of intra-myocardial injectate therapies for the rat model that has been widely used for MI research.

The beneficial effects of deferred delivery on the efficiency of hydrogel therapy post myocardial infarction.

Biomaterials are increasingly being investigated as a means of reducing stress within the ventricular wall of infarcted hearts and thus attenuating pathological remodelling and loss of function. In this context, we have examined the influence of timing of delivery on the efficacy of a polyethylene glycol hydrogel polymerised with an enzymatically degradable peptide sequence. Delivery of the hydrogel immediately after infarct induction resulted in no observable improvements, but a delay of one week in delivery resulted in significant increases in scar thickness and fractional shortening, as well as reduction in end-systolic diameter against saline controls and immediately injected hydrogel at both 2 and 4 weeks post-infarction (p < 0.05). Hydrogels injected at one week were degraded significantly slower than those injected immediately and this may have played a role in the differing outcomes. The hydrogel assumed markedly different morphologies at the two time points having either a fibrillar or bulky appearance after injection immediately or one week post-infarction respectively. We argue that the different morphologies result from infarction induced changes in the cardiac structure and influence the degradability of the injectates. The results indicate that timing of delivery is important and that very early time points may not be beneficial.