Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Environ Res ; 112: 230-4, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22099913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scientific evidence supports an association between environmental exposures and cancer. However, a reliable estimate for the proportion of cancers attributable to environmental factors is currently unavailable. This may be related to the varying definitions of the term "environment." The current review aims to determine how the reporting of the definition of the environment and of the estimates of environmentally attributable risks have changed over the past 50 years. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to retrieve all relevant publications relating to the environment and cancer from January 1960 to December 2010 using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Definitions of the environment and environmentally attributable risks for cancer were extracted from each relevant publication. RESULTS: The search resulted in 261 relevant publications. We found vast discrepancies in the definition of the environment, ranging from broad (including lifestyle factors, occupational exposures, pollutants, and other non-genetic factors) to narrow (including air, water, and soil pollutants). Reported environmentally attributable risk estimates ranged from 1% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the discrepancies in reporting environmental causation of cancer and the limits of inference in interpreting environmentally attributable risk estimates. Rather than achieving consensus on a single definition for the environment, we suggest the focus be on achieving transparency for any environmentally attributable risks.


Subject(s)
Environment , Environmental Exposure , Neoplasms/etiology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Exposure/classification , Humans , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/classification
2.
J Nutr Biochem ; 19(6): 347-61, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18499033

ABSTRACT

Historically, herbs and spices have enjoyed a rich tradition of use for their flavor enhancement characteristics and for their medicinal properties. The rising prevalence of chronic diseases worldwide and the corresponding rise in health care costs is propelling interest among researchers and the public for multiple health benefits related to these food items, including a reduction in cancer risk and modification of tumor behavior. A growing body of epidemiological and preclinical evidence points to culinary herbs and spices as minor dietary constituents with multiple anticancer characteristics. This review focuses on the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antitumorigenic properties of herbs and spices; their ability to influence carcinogen bioactivation; and likely anticancer contributions. While culinary herbs and spices present intriguing possibilities for health promotion, more complete information is needed about the actual exposures to dietary components that are needed to bring about a response and the molecular target(s) for specific herbs and spices. Only after this information is obtained will it be possible to define appropriate intervention strategies to achieve maximum benefits from herbs and spices without eliciting ill consequences.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/therapeutic use , Diet , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Plants, Medicinal , Spices , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Anticarcinogenic Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Biotransformation , Carcinogens/metabolism , Flavonoids/pharmacology , Humans , Inflammation/complications , Neoplasms/etiology , Plants, Medicinal/adverse effects , Spices/adverse effects , Terpenes/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...