User needs and design features of sanitation digital solutions in Kawempe division, Kampala Uganda: a user centered design approach.

Despite improvements in access to water and sanitation services globally, a significant population in Sub Saharan Africa has limited access to improved sanitation facilities. Furthermore, there is lack of a centralized digital platform for data exchange among stakeholders for sanitation services planning and provision in Uganda. A user centered design (UCD) approach was used to develop and pilot a one stop sanitation digital solutions (SaniDigS) center in Kawempe division, Kampala, Uganda. This involved three phases (1) understanding the sanitation status of the community which involved interviewing 1,844 household heads, (2) specifying the user needs of the proposed digital solution through stakeholder meetings and (3) Co designing of the innovations with potential users through stakeholder workshops. The quantitative data was visualized through the SaniDigS platform dashboard. The stakeholder meeting transcripts and notes were thematically analyzed to identify the user needs. The community user needs included an innovation that ensures confidentiality, is low cost and user friendly without internet connection. The service provider needed a sanitation digital solution that can market their sanitation products while, policy makers and planners needed comprehensive, real time data collection and sharing for trend analysis and informed decision making. The codesigned features of the SaniDigS informed by the user needs included: The SaniDigS Champion Application, SaniDigS platform dashboard, SaniDigS mobile application and the call center. The community in Kawempe showed need for subsidized sanitation products and we recommend further research to evaluate the effects of SaniDigS on planning, coordination, and access to sanitation services.

Is it feasible to implement a community-based participatory group programme to address issues of access to healthcare for people with disabilities in Luuka district Uganda? A study protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: On average, people with disabilities face many difficulties in accessing healthcare and experience worse health outcomes. Yet, evidence on how to overcome these barriers is lacking. Participatory approaches are gaining prominence as they can generate low-cost, appropriate and scalable solutions. This study protocol is for the pilot testing of the co-created Participatory Learning and Action for Disability (PLA-D) groups to assess feasibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will pilot test PLA-D in five groups in Luuka district, Uganda during 2023. Each group will include approximately 20 members (people with disabilities, family members, carers) who will meet every 2-3 weeks over a 9-11 month period. The groups, guided by a trained facilitator, will identify issues about health and healthcare access and plan and implement locally generated solutions (eg, raising awareness of rights, advocacy and lobbying, establishing health savings and financing schemes). We will collect diverse sources of data to assess feasibility: (1) in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with group participants, non-participants and group facilitators; (2) monitoring of group activities; (3) direct observation of groups and (4) quantitative survey of group participants at baseline and endline. Data analyses will be undertaken to assess feasibility in terms of: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. We will develop and refine evaluation tools in preparation for a future trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the study has been received by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and the Uganda Virus Research Institute ethics committees. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants, making adaptations for people with disabilities as necessary. We will reach different groups for our dissemination activities, including (1) people with disabilities (eg, community meetings); (2) policy and programme stakeholders in Uganda and international (eg, individual meetings, evidence briefs) and (3) academics (journal articles, conference/seminar presentations).

Evaluation of a WASH/MNCH targeted primary health care program in Uganda; a mixed methods study.

Background: Evidence on the impact of Maternal Newborn and child health (MNCH) and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) interventions on skilled birth attendance (SBA) and neonatal sepsis remains unclear. We conducted this study in Amuru district to generate evidence. Methods: A before-and-after study design was conducted. Interventions implemented included; training of HCWs, construction of WASH facilities, and health education of communities. A digitized structured questionnaire was used to obtain data on ANC and SBA, WASH practices and prevalence of pneumonia and diarrhea among 466 expectant mothers and caretakers of under-fives at baseline, midterm and endline. Data on sepsis incidence, ANC, SBA and WASH status was obtained from six healthcare facilities. A total of 12 KIIs and 12 FGDs were conducted. Data were analyzed using STATA 15. Two sample tests of proportions were used to compare findings at baseline and endline. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: The number of women delivering at HCFs significantly increased from 41.4% to 63.0% (p < .0001). Incidence of neonatal sepsis reduced from 0.6% to 0.2% (p = .0687), although the difference was not significant. Community-level findings also indicated a decline in cases of water-borne illnesses; cases of dysentery decreased from 10.0% to 0.6%, cases of cholera decreased from 8.9% to 1.9% at endline, cases of typhoid decreased from 26.5% to 12.7% at endline. Conclusion: This study revealed that integrated WASH/MNCH interventions can significantly increase ANC and SBA, reduce incidences of neonatal sepsis, diarrhea, pneumonia, and other related diseases and improve WASH practices in communities. Significant improvements in WASH/IPC and the capacity of HCWs to deliver safe MNCH services are realized.

A Situation Assessment of Community Health Workers' Preparedness in Supporting Health System Response to COVID-19 in Kenya, Senegal, and Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused socio-economic disruptions across the globe. The pandemic disrupted the health system (HS) calling for reengineering in response to high infection rates, deaths, and resultant containment measures. To deal with COVID-19 and promote resilience, community health workers (CHWs) were engaged across countries. OBJECTIVE: Assess the preparedness of CHWs in supporting health system response in prevention and management of COVID-19 in Kenya, Senegal, and Uganda. METHODS: A mixed methods design study involving national and subnational jurisdictions in the 3 countries. Key informant interviews were conducted with policy actors (16) and health care workers (24) while in-depth interviews involved CHWs (14) and community members (312) subjected to survey interviews. RESULTS: Most (>50%) households survived on

The perceived effects of COVID-19 pandemic on female genital mutilation/cutting and child or forced marriages in Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia and Senegal.

BACKGROUND: The effects of COVID-19 on harmful traditional practices such Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) and Child or Forced Marriages (CFM) have not been well documented. We examined respondents' perceptions on how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected FGM/C and CFM in Kenya, Uganda, Senegal, and Ethiopia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design with a mixed methods approach was used. Data collection on participants' perceptions on the effects of COVID-19 on FGM/C and CFM took place between October-December 2020. Household surveys targeting women and men aged 15-49 years in Kenya (n = 312), Uganda (n = 278), Ethiopia (n = 251), and Senegal (n = 208) were conducted. Thirty-eight key informant interviews with programme implementers and policymakers were carried out in Kenya (n = 17), Uganda (n = 9), Ethiopia (n = 8), and Senegal (n = 4). RESULTS: In Kenya, the COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to the increase in both FGM/C and CFM cases. Minimal increase of FGM/C cases was reported in Uganda and a significant increase in CFM cases. In Ethiopia, the COVID-19 pandemic had a limited perceived effect on changes in FGM/C and CFM. In Senegal, there were minimal perceived effects of COVID-19 on the number of FGM/C and CFM cases. The pandemic negatively affected implementation of interventions by the justice and legal system, the health system, and civil societies. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has had varied perceived effects on FGM/C and CFM across the four countries. Generally, the pandemic has negatively affected implementation of interventions by the various sectors that are responsible for preventing and responding to FGM/C and CFM. This calls for innovative approaches in intervening in the various communities to ensure that women and girls at risk of FGM/C and CFM or in need of services are reached during the pandemic. Evidence on how effective alternative approaches such as the use of call centres, radio talk shows and the use of local champions as part of risk communication in preventing and responding to FGM/C and CFM amid COVID-19 is urgently required.

Impediments to media communication of social change in family planning and reproductive health: experiences from East Africa.

The media has been employed to increase uptake of Family Planning through behaviour change communication (BCC). Understanding the barriers encountered in effectively undertaking this function would increase the strategy's effectiveness. Sixty journalists from East Africa participated in trainings to enhance their BCC skills for Family Planning in which a qualitative study was nested to identify barriers to effective Family Planning BCC in the region's media. The barriers were observed to be insufficient BCC skills, journalists' conflict of interest, interests of media houses, inaccessible sources of family planning information, editorial ideologies and absence of commercially beneficial demand. Coupled with the historical ideologies of the media in the region, the observed barriers have precipitated ineffective family planning BCC in the regions media. Effective BCC for family planning in the regions media requires capacity building among practitioners and alignment of the concept to the media's and consumers' aspirations.