The Impact of Maxillary Expansion on Adults' Nasal Breathing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Nasal surgery fails to restore nasal breathing in some cases. Maxillary constriction is suggested as a major cause of failure. It is thought that maxillary constriction leads to the closure of the internal and external nasal valves. Moreover, it is well established in the literature that maxillary expansion, both in adults and children, increases upper airway volume. However, it is yet unclear whether maxillary expansion may improve nasal function.Review Methods: Pubmed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Trip Database were checked by two authors from the Rhinology Study Group of the Young Otolaryngologists section of the International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies. Two authors extracted the data. The main outcome was expressed as the value (in variable units) prior to treatment (T0), after expansion procedures (T1), after the retention period (T2), and after a follow-up period (T3). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (257 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The data pooled in the meta-analysis reveals a statistically significant reduction of 0.27 Pa/cm3/s (CI 95% 0.15, 0.39) in nasal resistance after palatal expansion As far as subjective changes are concerned, the pooled data for the change in the NOSE score shows a statistically significant mean reduction after maxillary expansion of 40.08 points (CI 95% 36.28, 43.89). CONCLUSION: The initial available evidence is too limited to suggest maxillary expansion as a primary treatment option to target nasal breathing. However the data is encouraging with regards to the effect of maxillary expansion on nasal function. Further higher quality studies are needed in order to define clearer patient selection criteria, distinguish optimal techniques, and demonstrate long-term efficacy in long term follow up studies.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the sinus and nasal quality of life survey (SN-5) to Spanish.

OBJECTIVE: There is a high prevalence for rhinitis with an increasing trend. However, there is a lack of specific quality of life pediatric questionnaires for sinonasal symptoms. The Sinus and Nasal Quality of Life Survey (SN-5) is the only validated instrument specifically designed with this objective. In this work we have translated and validated the Spanish version of the SN5 questionnaire. METHODS: The SN5 was translated according to the World Health Organization recommendation for the translation and adaptation of instruments. The final version of the Sp-SN5 was administered twice (day 0 and day 7) to 137 participants with and without sinonasal symptoms. Reliability was measured with Cronbach α, temporal stability was measured with intraclass correlation coefficient. External validity was assessed with a ROC curve comparing a cohort of cases (children going to turbinate radiofrequency ablation) and controls (asymptomatic children). RESULTS: A Spearman correlation between the total result of the Sp-SN-5 questionnaire and the QOL score showed a strong negative correlation in the general sample and all the age subgroups. Internal consistency measured with Cronbach α was 0.87 for 5 items and was still over 0.83 after removing each item of the test. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest measurements was 0.94. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for all the included participants showed a very high area under the curve (0.998). CONCLUSIONS: The Sp-SN-5 questionnaire was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Spanish, and the translated version exhibited adequate properties. The survey was effective in assessing the quality of life of pediatric patients with sinonasal complaints and can be used for this purpose both in a clinical setting and in future research.

The Jaw Epidemic: Recognition, Origins, Cures, and Prevention.

Contemporary humans are living very different lives from those of their ancestors, and some of the changes have had serious consequences for health. Multiple chronic "diseases of civilization," such as cardiovascular problems, cancers, ADHD, and dementias are prevalent, increasing morbidity rates. Stress, including the disruption of traditional sleep patterns by modern lifestyles, plays a prominent role in the etiology of these diseases, including obstructive sleep apnea. Surprisingly, jaw shrinkage since the agricultural revolution, leading to an epidemic of crooked teeth, a lack of adequate space for the last molars (wisdom teeth), and constricted airways, is a major cause of sleep-related stress. Despite claims that the cause of this jaw epidemic is somehow genetic, the speed with which human jaws have changed, especially in the last few centuries, is much too fast to be evolutionary. Correlation in time and space strongly suggests the symptoms are phenotypic responses to a vast natural experiment-rapid and dramatic modifications of human physical and cultural environments. The agricultural and industrial revolutions have produced smaller jaws and less-toned muscles of the face and oropharynx, which contribute to the serious health problems mentioned above. The mechanism of change, research and clinical trials suggest, lies in orofacial posture, the way people now hold their jaws when not voluntarily moving them in speaking or eating and especially when sleeping. The critical resting oral posture has been disrupted in societies no longer hunting and gathering. Virtually all aspects of how modern people function and rest are radically different from those of our ancestors. We also briefly discuss treatment of jaw symptoms and possible clinical cures for individuals, as well as changes in society that might lead to better care and, ultimately, prevention.

The role of pediatric maxillary expansion on nasal breathing. A systematic review and metanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: A reduced transversal dimension of the maxilla leads to narrower nasal cavities, which may reduce airflow to the lungs. Maxillary expansion widens nasal floor. However, there is huge controversy regarding whether this increase does actually lead to increased airflow. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aim to resolve this question by evaluating studies that have undertaken rhinomanometric measurements. REVIEW METHODS: Pubmed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Trip Database were checked by two authors. Two authors extracted the data. Main outcome was expressed as the difference between resistance before and after treatment and the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: 30 studies were selected for full text reading. A total of 12 studies (301 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All selected articles found reduced resistance after palatal expansion. The data pooled in the meta-analysis reveals a statistically significant difference of 0.12 Pa s/cm3 mean reduction after palatal expansion (CI 95% 0.06, 0.18) for nine uncontrolled studies. Regarding nasal airflow, the pooled data show a statistically significant difference of 29.9 cm3/s increase after palatal expansion (CI 95% 9.17, 50.64). CONCLUSION: According to the available evidence, palatal expansion in pediatric patients decreases nasal resistance and increases nasal flow.