Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 136(4): 1047-54.e10, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25843313

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recently identified dog lipocalin allergen Can f 4 is an important respiratory allergen. OBJECTIVE: We sought to comprehensively characterize the memory CD4(+) T-cell responses of allergic and nonallergic subjects to Can f 4. METHODS: Can f 4-specific CD4(+)CD45RO(+) T-cell lines (TCLs) from allergic and healthy subjects were established and characterized by their functional and phenotypic properties. The epitope specificity of the TCLs was tested with 48 overlapping 16-mer peptides spanning the sequence of Can f 4. HLA restriction of the specific TCLs and the binding capacity of the epitope-containing peptides to common HLA class II molecules were studied. RESULTS: Can f 4-specific memory CD4(+) TCLs were obtained at an 8-fold higher frequency from allergic than from nonallergic subjects. Functionally, the TCLs of allergic subjects exhibited a higher T-cell receptor avidity and expression of CD25 and predominantly produced IL-4 and IL-5. The TCLs of nonallergic subjects mostly secreted IFN-γ and IL-10, with high CXCR3 expression. Several distinct T-cell epitope regions along the allergen were identified. Importantly, the peptides from the region between amino acids 43 and 67 showed promiscuous HLA-binding capacity and induced memory CD4(+) T-cell responses in 90% of the allergic donors. CONCLUSION: Productive TH2-deviated memory T-cell responses to Can f 4 are observed in allergic but not nonallergic subjects. A 19-mer peptide sequence covering the core of the immunodominant region of the allergen is a potential target for the development of peptide-based allergen immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunologic Memory , Lipocalins/immunology , Th2 Cells/immunology , Allergens/pharmacology , Animals , Cell Line , Cytokines/immunology , Dogs , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation/immunology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/pathology , Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit/immunology , Lipocalins/pharmacology , Male , Receptors, CXCR3/immunology
2.
PLoS One ; 9(5): e98461, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24875388

ABSTRACT

Lipocalin allergens form a notable group of proteins, as they contain most of the significant respiratory allergens from mammals. The basis for the allergenic capacity of allergens in the lipocalin family, that is, the development of T-helper type 2 immunity against them, is still unresolved. As immunogenicity has been proposed to be a decisive feature of allergens, the purpose of this work was to examine human CD4+ T cell responses to the major dog allergen Can f 1 and to compare them with those to its human homologue, tear lipocalin (TL). For this, specific T cell lines were induced in vitro from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of Can f 1-allergic and healthy dog dust-exposed subjects with peptides containing the immunodominant T cell epitopes of Can f 1 and the corresponding TL peptides. We found that the frequency of Can f 1 and TL-specific T cells in both subject groups was low and close to each other, the difference being about two-fold. Importantly, we found that the proliferative responses of both Can f 1 and TL-specific T cell lines from allergic subjects were stronger than those from healthy subjects, but that the strength of the responses within the subject groups did not differ between these two antigens. Moreover, the phenotype of the Can f 1 and TL-specific T cell lines, determined by cytokine production and expression of cell surface markers, resembled each other. The HLA system appeared to have a minimal role in explaining the allergenicity of Can f 1, as the allergic and healthy subjects' HLA background did not differ, and HLA binding was very similar between Can f 1 and TL peptides. Along with existing data on lipocalin allergens, we conclude that strong antigenicity is not decisive for the allergenicity of Can f 1.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Lipocalin 1/immunology , Allergens/chemistry , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Cell Line , Cytokines/biosynthesis , Dogs , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/chemistry , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/immunology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Lipocalin 1/chemistry , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Peptides/chemistry , Peptides/immunology , Phenotype , Protein Binding , Th1 Cells/immunology , Th1 Cells/metabolism , Th2 Cells/immunology , Th2 Cells/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...