ABSTRACT
A wealth of evidence indicates that humans can engage two types of mechanisms to solve category-learning tasks: declarative mechanisms, which involve forming and testing verbalizable decision rules, and associative mechanisms, which involve gradually linking stimuli to appropriate behavioral responses.1,2,3 In contrast to declarative mechanisms, associative mechanisms have received surprisingly little attention in the broader category-learning literature. Although various forms of associatively driven artificial intelligence (AI) have matched-and even surpassed-humans' performance on several challenging problems,3,4,5,6 associative learning is routinely dismissed as being too simple to power the impressive cognitive achievements of both humans and non-human species.6,7,8,9 Here, we attempt to resolve this paradox by demonstrating that pigeons-which appear to rely solely on associative learning mechanisms in several tasks that promote declarative rule use by humans3,10,11,12-succeed at learning a novel, highly demanding category structure that ought to hinder declarative rule use: the sectioned-rings task. Our findings highlight the power and flexibility that associative mechanisms afford in the realm of category learning.
