Difference in Prognosis between Continuation and Discontinuation of A 5-Month Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Outpatients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a requisite component of care for patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in outpatients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to those in patients with non-HFpEF who did and did not continue a 5-month CR program. METHODS: 173 outpatients with HF who participated in a 5-month CR program were registered. We divided them into two groups: HFpEF (n = 84, EF 63 ± 7%) and non-HFpEF (n = 89, EF 31 ± 11%). We further divided the patients into those who continued the CR program (continued group) and those who did not (discontinued group) in the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups. The clinical outcomes at 5 months were compared among the groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at baseline between the continued and discontinued groups in the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups except for % diabetes mellitus in the non-HFpEF group. The rates of all-cause death and hospital admissions in the continued group in both the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups were significantly lower than those in the discontinued group. The all-cause death and hospital admissions in each group were independently associated with the continuation of the CR program. CONCLUSIONS: The continuation of a 5-month CR program was associated with the prevention of all-cause death and hospital admissions in both the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups.

Differential prognostic impact between completion and non-completion of a 5-month cardiac rehabilitation program in outpatients with cardiovascular diseases.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an essential component of care for patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes in outpatients with CVD who did and did not complete a 5-month CR program. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-two outpatients with CVD who participated in a 5-month CR program and were followed-up for maximum 5 years were registered. We divided the patients into two groups: those who completed the CR program (success group, n = 175) and those who could not (non-success group, n = 157). Both long-term (5 years) and short-term (5 months) clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at baseline between the success and non-success groups. With regard to both long-term and short-term clinical outcomes, the rates of all-cause death and hospital admission in the success group were significantly lower than those in the non-success group by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. There was a significant difference in short-term CVD death and hospital admission between the groups, but not for long-term CVD death and hospital. In long-term period, all-cause death and hospital admission was independently associated with completion of the CR program in addition to the presence of peripheral artery disease and VE vs. VCO2 slope after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, types of CVD and medications. CONCLUSIONS: Completion of a 5-month CR program was associated with the prevention of all-cause death and hospital admission, but not CVD death and hospital admission in the long-term, which suggests that we need to reconsider this issue.

Possibility of Cardio-renal Protection by Long-term Cardiac Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases.

Objective Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves the mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Even in elderly patients with CVD, CR may improve the activities of daily living (ADL). Methods Eighty-eight outpatients over 65 years of age at the beginning of a CR program (baseline) at Fukuoka University Hospital who had CVD and could be followed-up for up to 5 years were enrolled. CVD included ischemic heart disease, postoperative valvular heart disease, dissecting aneurysm of the aorta and peripheral artery disease. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline (55.4±14.8 mL/min/1.73 m2): high (≥55.4, n=44) and low (<55.4, n=44)-eGFR groups. The anaerobic threshold (AT) during exercise and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured by cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) and ultrasound cardiography, respectively. The serum brain natriuretic protein (BNP) was also measured every year. Results The average age at baseline in all patients was 73±6 years. In all patients, the level of eGFR did not significantly change for 5 years (55±15 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline vs. 48±14 at the end of the study). The AT (3.7±1.0 METs at baseline vs. 3.3±0.5), LVEF (57±13% vs. 64±10%) and BNP (260±452 pg/mL vs. 308±345) were also maintained for 5 years. In both the low- and high-eGFR groups, the eGFR, AT during exercise, LVEF and BNP at the end of the study were not significantly changed compared to the baseline values, although some changes were observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion Long-term CR in CVD outpatients over 65 years of age helped maintain the AT, LVEF, BNP and eGFR for 5 years. CR afforded cardio-renal protection in elderly patients with CVD.

Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular disease leads various hemodynamic parameters obtained using simple non-invasive tests to their appropriate levels.

We evaluated whether comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) could improve various hemodynamic parameters obtained using simple non-invasive tests. We analyzed 48 CVD patients with (n = 38, CR group) or without (n = 10, non-CR group) a CR program, and prospectively followed them for 12 months. Various parameters were measured at baseline and after 12 months using 3 simple non-invasive tests: blood pressure (BP) and severity of atherosclerosis [arterial velocity pulse index (AVI) and atrial pressure volume index] were determined using PASESA®, an index of total autonomic nerve activity and a coefficient of variation of the R-R interval (CVRR) were determined using eHEART®, and the total peripheral resistance, stroke volume and cardiac index (CI) were determined using nico®. The main hemodynamic parameters did not change between baseline and 12 months in both groups. Patients in the CR group were divided into higher (H-) and lower (L-) systolic BP (SBP) or AVI according to the average value of SBP or AVI at baseline in the CR group. Patients with H-SBP or H-AVI in the CR group showed a significant reduction of SBP or AVI at 12 months. In addition, patients in the CR group were divided into H- and L- CI or CVRR according to the average value of CI or CVRR at baseline in the CR group. Patients with L-CI or L-CVRR in the CR group significantly improved after 12 months. In conclusion, CR may lead various hemodynamic parameters obtained using simple non-invasive tests to their appropriate levels.

Assessment of various parameters using simple non-invasive tests in patients with cardiovascular diseases with or without cardiac rehabilitation.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiac function and exercise capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Simpler techniques are needed for use by physicians in the examination room to assess the usefulness of CR. We enrolled 46 consecutive CVD patients in a CR program (CR group) and prospectively followed them for 3 months. We compared them to 18 age-, gender- and body mass index-matched CVD patients without CR (non-CR group). Various parameters were measured at baseline and after 3 months using 3 simple non-invasive tests: severity of atherosclerosis [arterial velocity pulse index and arterial pressure volume index (API)] were determined using PASESA®, an autonomic nerve total activity amount index and a coefficient of variation of the R-R interval (CVRR) were determined using eHEART®, and peripheral resistance index, pressure rate product, stroke volume and cardiac index were determined using nico®]. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics including percentages (%) of ischemic heart disease and heart failure between the non-CR and CR groups. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic BP, heart rate and API at baseline significantly decreased and CVRR at baseline significantly increased after 3 months in the CR group, but not in the non-CR group. In addition, ΔAPI (Δ = the value after 3 months minus the value at baseline) was positively associated with ΔSBP in the CR group. In conclusion, CR significantly decreased BP and improved atherosclerosis and sympathetic nerve activity. These findings suggest that simple non-invasive tests may be useful for assessing the effects of CR.

Influence of a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program on Renal Function in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in a One-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Exercise training may improve renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with exercise training on renal function has not yet been established. We evaluated the effects of CR on renal function in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: Twenty-three CVD patients in a 1-year CR program (CR group) who had ischemic heart disease (IHD) and/or heart failure were compared with 26 age- and gender-matched CVD patients without CR (non-CR group, standard pharmacological care alone). At baseline and after 1 year, urea nitrogen (UN), creatinine (Cr), potassium (K), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and hematocrit (Hct) in blood were assessed. RESULTS: There were no differences in the patient characteristics at baseline between the CR and non-CR groups except for the percentages of heart failure and the use of calcium channel blocker. After 1 year, there were no significant changes in UN, Cr, K, eGFR or Hct in either the CR or non-CR groups. The patients in the CR group were divided into two groups according to the eGFR level at baseline: low (n = 12, eGFR < 51 mL/minute/1.73 m2, indicating mild-to-moderate CKD) and high (n = 11, eGFR ≥ 51 mL/minute/1.73 m2) eGFR groups. Although there were no differences in the patient characteristics at baseline between the low and high eGFR groups, the low eGFR group showed a significant increase in eGFR after the 1-year CR program. CONCLUSIONS: CR may improve renal function in patients with mild-to-moderate CKD.