[Counselling customers with psychotropic vs. cardiovascular prescriptions: a survey among Austrian community pharmacists]. / Beratungstätigkeit von ApothekerInnen bei psychischen und kardiovaskulären Gesundheitsproblemen ihrer KundInnen. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter ApothekerInnen in österreichischen öffentlichen Apotheken.

BACKGROUND: Prescriptions for psychotropic drugs in general and their share of all prescriptions have substantially risen over the last decades. Thus, also counselling by pharmacists becomes more important in this area. This study focuses on how community pharmacists see their own role when counselling persons with prescriptions for psychotropic medication and how this differs from counselling persons with other types of prescriptions. METHODS: Based on the Toronto Community Pharmacists' Questionnaire an online questionnaire was developed with the assistance of the Austrian Pharmacists Association. This instrument elicits pharmacists' attitudes toward and professional interactions with users of psychotropic drugs on the one hand and of cardiovascular medication on the other. After a pilot study the questionnaire - which was to be filled in anonymously - was put on a web portal for six months and Austrian community pharmacists were invited to answer it. RESULTS: 125 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. Overall it was reported, that new customers with psychotropic prescriptions were less often counselled than those with prescriptions for cardiovascular medication. The main reasons for this difference seem to be the lack of privacy in public pharmacies, the fear of stigmatising customers with psychotropic medication and a perceived lack of training concerning the treatment of mental disorders. In addition to improving such training, it was suggested that seminars and workshops for communication skills should be organised. CONCLUSION: The reduced frequency in counselling new customers with psychotropic medication is related to a lack of privacy in public pharmacies, fear of stigmatising customers and a perceived need for improving the training on the treatment of mental disorders.

Influence of site differences between urban and rural American and Central European opioid-dependent pregnant women and neonatal outcome characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Multi-center trials enable the recruitment of larger study samples, although results might be influenced by site-specific factors. METHODS: Site differences of a multi-center prospective double-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled trial (7 centers: Central Europe (Vienna)/USA (3 urban/3 rural centers)) comparing safety and efficacy of methadone and buprenorphine in pregnant opioid-dependent women and their neonates. RESULTS: Urban US women had the highest rate of concomitant opioid (p = 0.050) and cocaine consumption (p = 0.003), the highest dropout rate (p = 0.001), and received the lowest voucher sums (p = 0.001). Viennese neonates had significantly higher Apgar scores 1 min (p = 0.001) and 5 min after birth (p < 0.001) and were more often born by cesarean section (p = 0.024). Rural US newborns had a significantly shorter neonatal abstinence syndrome treatment duration compared to Viennese and urban US sites (p = 0.006), in addition to other site-specific differences, suggesting a more severely affected group of women in the urban US sites. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial represents a role model for pharmacological treatment in this unique sample of pregnant women and demonstrates the clinical importance of considering site-specific factors in research and clinical practice.

[The German language version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) among dementia patients]. / Die Erfassung des Bedarfs bei Demenzkranken mittels Camberwell Assessment of Need (CANE) for the Elderly.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to assess the needs of dementia patients using the German language version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) and to investigate the internal consistency of German language. METHODS: A sample of 45 dementia patients was investigated using the German CANE. Data were collected from family caregivers. RESULTS: Most dementia patients showed a multitude of problems. In most cases, support was provided more frequently from informal caregivers than from social or medical services. Internal consistency ranged between 0.797 and 0.900 (Cronbach's Alpha). CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of problems indicates the importance of long-term planning of services for dementia patients. The internal consistency of the German CANE was sufficiently high.

The Carers' Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D): development, validity and reliability.

BACKGROUND: A variety of interventions are available to support the caregivers of dementia patients. For the purposes of service planning, we developed an instrument to assess the needs of these caregivers and to determine whether needs are met. The reliability and validity of this new instrument was also investigated. METHODS: The development of the Carers' Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D), was based on in-depth interviews and a focus group. The combined inter-rater and test-retest reliability was investigated among 45 dementia caregivers. Correlations of the CNA-D with the Zarit Burden Inventory were used to analyze concurrent validity. Content validity was investigated by performing a separate survey among 40 caregivers and 40 professionals. RESULTS: The CNA-D is a semi-structured research interview including 18 problem areas. For each problem area, the CNA-D offers several possible interventions. The relevance of the problem areas and the interventions (content validity) was confirmed by most of the study participants. Significant positive associations were found between the total score of the Zarit Burden Inventory and the number of problems and the number of unmet needs according to the CNA-D. The agreement between the interviewers was "excellent" (kappa above 0.75) in 73.7% of the problem areas and in 69.9% of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The CNA-D is a valid and reliable instrument for comprehensively assessing the needs of dementia caregivers.