Tratamiento de la trombosis venosa profunda distal / Treatment of distal deep vein thrombosis

No disponible

Dataset of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (EL-COVID) survey.

This dataset supports the findings of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic survey (the EL-COVID survey). The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union was taken into consideration in all steps of data handling. The survey was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Primary Investigator and an online English survey consisting of 18 questions was developed ad-hoc. A bilingual English-Mandarin version of the questionnaire was developed according to the instructions of the Chinese Medical Association in order to be used in mainland People's Republic of China. Differences between the two questionnaires were minor and did affect the process of data collection. Both questionnaires were hosted online. The EL-COVID survey was advertised through major social media. All national and regional contributors contacted their respective colleagues through direct messaging on social media or by email. Eight national societies or groups supported the dissemination of the EL-COVID survey. The data provided demographics information of the EL-COVID participants and an insight on the level of difficulty in accessing or citing previously attended online activities and whether participants were keen on citing these activities in their Curricula Vitae. A categorization of additional comments made by the participants are also based on the data. The survey responses were filtered, anonymized and submitted to descriptive analysis of percentage.

Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The EL-COVID Survey.

BACKGROUND: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2-4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery.

Aggressive angiomyxoma to 57-year old man.

Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare mesenchymal tumor occurring usually in women of reproductive age in pelvic-perineum region. These myofibroblastic tumors rarely affect men and non-pelvic-perineum anatomical sites. There are few literature references for aggressive angiomyxoma in men. We describe a case of a 57-year old male with aggressive angiomyxoma of the scrotum and its management.

Increased Serum KLF4 in Severe Atheromatosis and Extensive Aneurysmal Disease.

BACKGROUND: Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is known to preserve vascular homeostasis. In the present study, we sought to correlate serum KLF4 levels with arterial aneurysm size and their clinical presentation. We also explored the association between serum KLF4 levels and the severity of extracranial carotid and peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for various forms of atheromatosis (ATH group) or for arterial aneurysm repair (AA group) were eligible for inclusion. KLF4 levels were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Patients in the atheromatic and aneurysmal groups had significantly higher serum KLF4 levels compared with controls. Patients with permanent end-organ damage (ATH3) had higher serum KLF4 (6.96 ± 0.75 pg/mL) compared with patients with asymptomatic internal carotid stenosis >70% or claudication (ATH1) (2.76 ± 0.68 pg/mL; mean difference [MD], -4.20; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -5.35 to -3.04; P < 0.01) and those with transient ischemic attack or rest pain (ATH2) (4.47 ± 1.08 pg/mL; MD, -2.48; 95% CI, -3.76 to -1.21). Furthermore, patients with an asymptomatic aneurysm of a diameter 250-300% of that of the normal artery (AA1, 5.01 ± 1.08 pg/mL) had considerably lower serum KLF4 compared with those suffering from either a symptomatic aneurysm or an asymptomatic aneurysm of a diameter >350% of that of normal artery (AA3, 6.63 ± 1.92 pg/mL; MD, -2.61; 95% CI, -5.04 to -0.18; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Serum KLF4 levels are significantly increased in patients with end-organ damage related to atheromatosis as well as those with extensive aneurysmal disease.

Treatment of distal deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of distal (below the knee) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is not clearly established. Distal DVT can either be treated with anticoagulation, or monitored with close follow-up to detect progression to the proximal veins (above the knee), which requires anticoagulation. Proponents of this monitoring strategy base their decision to withhold anticoagulation on the fact that progression is rare and most people can be spared from potential bleeding and other adverse effects of anticoagulation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of different treatment interventions for people with distal (below the knee) deep vein thrombosis (DVT). SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 12 February 2019. We also undertook reference checking to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of distal DVT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials and extracted data. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Primary outcomes of interest were recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), DVT and major bleeding and follow up ranged from three months to two years. We performed fixed-effect model meta-analyses with risk ratio (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We identified eight RCTs reporting on 1239 participants. Five trials randomised participants to anticoagulation for up to three months versus no anticoagulation. Three trials compared anticoagulation treatment for different time periods. Anticoagulant compared to no intervention or placebo for distal DVT treatment Anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reduced the risk of recurrent VTE during follow-up compared with participants receiving no anticoagulation (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.77; 5 studies, 496 participants; I2 = 3%; high-certainty evidence), and reduced the risk of recurrence of DVT (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.67; 5 studies, 496 participants; I2 = 0%; high-certainty evidence). There was no clear effect on risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.59; 4 studies, 480 participants; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference in major bleeding with anticoagulation compared to placebo (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.62; 4 studies, 480 participants; I2 = 26%; low-certainty evidence). There was an increase in clinically relevant non-major bleeding events in the group treated with anticoagulants (RR 3.34, 95% CI 1.07 to 10.46; 2 studies, 322 participants; I2 = 0%; high-certainty evidence). There was one death, not related to PE or major bleeding, in the anticoagulation group. Anticoagulation for three months or more compared to anticoagulation for six weeks for distal DVT treatment Three RCTs of 736 participants compared three or more months of anticoagulation with six weeks of anticoagulation. Anticoagulation with a VKA for three months or more reduced the incidence of recurrent VTE to 5.8% compared with 13.9% in participants treated for six weeks (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.68; 3 studies, 736 participants; I2 = 50%; high-certainty evidence). The risk for recurrence of DVT was also reduced (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.64; 2 studies, 389 participants; I2 = 48%; high-certainty evidence), but there was probably little or no difference in PE (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.19 to 5.88; 2 studies, 389 participants; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). There was no clear difference in major bleeding events (RR 3.42, 95% CI 0.36 to 32.35; 2 studies, 389 participants; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.90 to 3.42; 2 studies, 389 participants; I2 = 1%; low-certainty evidence) between three months or more of treatment and six weeks of treatment. There were no reports for overall mortality or PE and major bleeding-related deaths. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our review found a benefit for people with distal DVT treated with anticoagulation therapy using VKA with little or no difference in major bleeding events although there was an increase in clinically relevant non-major bleeding when compared to no intervention or placebo. The small number of participants in this meta-analysis and strength of evidence prompts a call for more research regarding the treatment of distal DVT. RCTs comparing different treatments and different treatment periods with placebo or compression therapy, are required.

An Update on Novel Antiplatelets in Vascular Patients.

BACKGROUND: Acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and cilostazol are well-established agents inhibiting the normal function of platelets with known advantages and limitations. The development of novel antiplatelet agents aims to provide equal or superior outcomes for patients and simultaneously minimize side effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this manuscript is to review the latest data on the use of novel antiplatelet agents in vascular patients. METHOD: Based on our 2016 review, a further search in the English medical literature has yielded a number of publications on cangrelor, prasugrel, ticagrelor, vorapaxar and a number of other - still experimental - agents (Ir- 6, UBO-QIC, W1, revacept and YM-254890). RESULTS: Recently published data have not altered the use and indications of cangrelor, prasugrel and vorapaxar; all of them now approved by both FDA and EMA. The EUCLID trial has recently provided valuable data on the clinical use of ticagrelor, although results regarding vascular patients and administration of ticagrelor are still under scrutiny. Vorapaxar remains the only novel antiplatelet that is approved for PAD. Randomized control trials that focus on vascular patients are necessary to establish the safety and efficacy of these novel agents. Despite their positive initial results, most novel experimental antiplatelets are still in early development, thus in preclinical or early clinical phases of their trials. Research on three novel antiplatelets is currently discontinued (atopaxar, darexaban and elinogrel). CONCLUSION: Vorapaxar remains the only novel antiplatelet that is approved for PAD. Other novel antiplatelets demonstrate positive results, but further studies focused on vascular patients are necessary. Novel experimental antiplatelets are still in the early phases of the clinical and preclinical studies.

Intestinal Perforation in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Experience of 2123 Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Intestinal perforation remains a clinical challenge and potentially lethal complication in renal transplant recipients. Immunosuppression not only places the patient at risk for intestinal perforation but also masks classic clinical symptoms and signs of acute abdominal pain, leading to delayed diagnosis and proper treatment. The aim of our study is to present the experience of our center on the treatment of intestinal perforation in renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reported 11 patients (0.52%) with intestinal perforation among a group of 2123 patients who received renal transplants in the Transplantation Unit at Laikon General Hospital in Athens, Greece from 1983 to August 2015. RESULTS: One patient died from septic shock before any surgery, and 3 patients died during the early postoperative period, resulting in a morality rate of 36.3%. All patients who died had a functioning graft. From the patients who were discharged, the mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 4-32 months). CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal perforation after renal transplant is a major and potentially lethal complication. Clinical presentation is usually equivocal, and the transplant surgeon should be highly suspicious when treating a renal transplant recipient with acute abdominal pain, even in cases without other predisposing factors (diverticulitis, ischemic colitis, and so forth), so that this condition could be investigated and unmasked.