Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(9): e46125, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900540

ABSTRACT

Myofibroblastoma (MFB) is a rare but benign mesenchymal tumor most commonly appearing within breast tissue. Most cases of MFB occur in postmenopausal women and are treated by surgical excision. The diagnosis of MFB is made through immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, with the most common biomarkers being CD34+, desmin+, smooth muscle actin+, and vimentin+. In this article, we describe a case of an MFB in a premenopausal female with variance from classic IHC findings. We also performed a systemic review of the MFB of the breast. The systemic review compiles the most common IHC findings of MFB, patient demographics, treatment methods, lesion size, and the presence or absence of pain associated with the lesion. As MFB can share many features with other breast lesions, including potentially malignant ones, this article sought to underline the most common IHC findings and characteristics of MFB to aid in the proper diagnosis of MFB.

2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(1): 2002083, 2022 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130825

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus outbreak was declared a pandemic in March 2020. We are reviewing the COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use in the United States by discussing the mechanisms of action, administration, side effects, and efficacy of vaccines developed by Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson. Pfizer and Moderna developed mRNA vaccines, encoding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, whereas Johnson & Johnson developed an adenovirus vector-based vaccine. Safety has been shown in a large cohort of participants in clinical trials as well as the general population since emergency approval of vaccine administration in the US. Clinical trial results showed the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to be 95.0%, and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine to be 66.0% effective in protecting against moderate and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is important to keep medical literature updated with the ongoing trials of these vaccinations, especially as they are tested among different age groups and upon the emergence of novel variants of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Vaccination
3.
Spine Deform ; 8(4): 605-611, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162197

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the role of insurance type, geographic socioeconomic status, and ethnicity in AIS disease severity in a state with mandated scoliosis screenings. Early detection of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is associated with reduced curve progression, surgical treatment, and long-term sequelae. Type of insurance, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status are important determinants in healthcare access. METHODS: Data were obtained for 561 AIS patients aged 10-18 years, living within a single county, and presenting to a single healthcare system for initial evaluation of AIS between 2010 and 2016 that met inclusion criteria. Demographic data including gender, age, self-reported ethnicity, insurance, and zip code were collected. Outcome measures included Cobb angle, curve severity, and referral delay. A single fellowship-trained pediatric orthopedic surgeon calculated presenting Cobb angle for each case. Zip code was used as a proxy for household income level. Independent sample t tests, analysis of variance and covariance, and χ2 analysis were used to determine the significant differences and correlations. RESULTS: Female patients (n = 326, CA = 22.4°) had significantly greater Cobb angle measurements compared with male patients (n = 117, CA = 18.1°). Patients with government-supported insurance had significantly higher Cobb angles (CA = 22.1°) than privately insured patients (CA = 19.2°) but were both classified within the "mild" range clinically, and are likely not clinically significant. There was no correlation between income level and Cobb angle. Referral delay and Cobb angle severity did not vary by age, income, or insurance. A χ2 analysis showed no association between Cobb angle and race. CONCLUSIONS: Cobb angle severity was not influenced by SES factors, including ethnicity and household income. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-II.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Negative Results , Scoliosis/pathology , Social Class , Thoracic Vertebrae/pathology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Delayed Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health , Male , Racial Groups , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/ethnology , Scoliosis/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...