Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Rev Med Liege ; 76(5-6): 507-514, 2021 05.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080388

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women and is linked in over 95 % of cases to papillomavirus infection, the incidence of which has fallen in recent years due to screening and vaccination. Almost half of these cancers are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage with an overall 5-year survival of around 65 %. In recent decades, the management strategy of these locally advanced cancers has changed considerably and has allowed the improvement of survival but above all of local control as well as the reduction of toxicity, due to the implementation of imaging. Standard treatment consists of external beam radiation therapy combined with concomitant chemotherapy followed by intrauterine brachytherapy. The role of neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy is still being evaluated. New therapeutic approaches (particularly immunotherapy) in addition to standard treatment are also being studied.


Le cancer du col de l'utérus est le quatrième cancer le plus fréquent chez la femme et est lié, dans sup�rieur a 95 % des cas, à une infection par le papillomavirus, dont l'incidence a chuté ces dernières années grâce au dépistage et à la vaccination. Près de la moitié de ces cancers sont diagnostiqués à un stade localement avancé avec une survie globale à 5 ans de l'ordre de 65 %. Ces dernières décennies, la stratégie de prise en charge de ces cancers localement avancés a considérablement changé. Elle a permis l'amélioration de la survie, mais surtout du contrôle local, ainsi que la réduction de la toxicité, grâce notamment à l'implémentation de l'imagerie. Le traitement standard consiste en une radiothérapie externe associée à une chimiothérapie concomitante, suivie d'une curiethérapie intra-utérine. La place de la chimiothérapie néo-adjuvante et adjuvante est toujours en cours d'évaluation. De nouvelles approches thérapeutiques (immunothérapie), en complément du traitement standard, sont aussi à l'étude.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy Dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(5): 1117-1123, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33268212

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients treated by robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer within the Belgium Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of women with clinically Stage I endometrial cancer who underwent surgical treatment from 2007 to 2018 in five institutions of the BGOG group. RESULTS: A total of 598 consecutive women were identified. The rate of conversion to laparotomy was low (0.8%). The mean postoperative Complication Common Comprehensive Index (CCI) score was 3.4. The rate of perioperative complications did not differ between age groups, however the disease-free survival was significantly lower in patients over 75 years compared to patients under 65 years of age (p=0.008). Per-operative complications, conversion to laparotomy rate, post-operative hospital stay, CCI score and disease-free survival were not impacted by increasing BMI. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted surgery for the surgical treatment of patients suffering from early-stage endometrial cancer is associated with favourable surgical and oncologic outcomes, particularly for unfavourable groups such as elderly and obese women, thus permitting a low morbidity minimally-invasive surgical approach for the majority of patients in expert centres.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Hysterectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Belgium , Conversion to Open Surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Obesity/complications , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(10): 3891-3897, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32472415

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of paraaortic lymphadenectomy were compared for the treatment of gynecological malignancies to identify the most appropriate surgical approach. METHODS: Our retrospective, multicentric study included 1304 patients who underwent paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies. The patients were categorized into the following five groups based on treatment type: transperitoneal laparoscopy (group A, n = 198), extraperitoneal laparoscopy (group B, n = 681), robot-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopy (group C, n = 135), robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopy (group D, n = 44), and laparotomy (group E, n = 246). RESULTS: The prevalence of cancer types differed according to the surgical approach: there were more ovarian cancers in group E and more cervical cancers in groups B and D (p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss was higher in group E (844.2 mL) than in groups treated with minimally invasive interventions (115.8-141.5 mL, p < 0.005). For infrarenal dissection, fewer nodes were removed in group C compared with the other approaches (16 vs. 21 nodes, respectively, p < 0.05). The average operative time ranged from 169 min for group A to 247 min for group E (p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was 14 days for group E versus 3.5 days for minimally invasive procedures (p < 0.05). The early postoperative grade 3 and superior Dindo-Clavien complications occurred in 9-10% of the patients in groups B-D, 15% of the patients in group E, and only 3% and 4% for groups A and C, respectively. The most common complication was lymphocele. CONCLUSIONS: Laparotomy increases preoperative and postoperative morbidity. The robot-assisted transperitoneal approach demonstrated a poorer lymph node yield than laparotomy and extraperitoneal approaches.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female , Laparoscopy , Robotics , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Humans , Laparotomy , Lymph Node Excision , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures
4.
Rev Med Liege ; 72(1): 10-13, 2017 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28387071

ABSTRACT

Actinomycosis is a rare chronic disease caused by a group of anaerobic Gram positive bacteria. It may mimic a neoplasia at various anatomical levels. A pelvic localization is exceptional but has an increasing incidence since the use of intrauterine devices. In such cases, pelvic actinomycosis may present as a gynecological or a lower colonic malignancy. For all atypical clinical, with a prominent infectious or inflammatory context, the diagnosis of actinomycosis must be suggested and discussed with the pathologist to whom the biopsy will be submitted. In the absence of a preoperative diagnosis, an inadequately aggressive pelvic surgery might be performed and rendered particularly complex due to the adherent and diffusely inflammatory pattern of the disease. The treatment of choice remains a long-term therapy with antibiotics that leads to a complete clinical and radiological response in the majority of cases. We report the case of a 27-year-old woman with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of rectal carcinoma but with limited preoperative biopsy that revealed a pelvic actinomycosis and allowed a conservative and successful antibacterial treatment.


L'actinomycose est une pathologie bactérienne rare pouvant prendre un aspect pseudo-tumoral. La localisation pelvienne est exceptionnelle, mais d'incidence croissante depuis l'utilisation des dispositifs intra-utérins. La présentation peut alors évoquer une néoplasie gynécologique ou colique basse. Devant tout tableau clinique atypique suggérant une malignité pelvienne mais dominé par un contexte infectieux et/ou inflammatoire, le diagnostic d'actinomycose doit être évoqué et discuté avec le collègue anatomo-athologiste auquel les prélèvements histologiques seront soumis. En l'absence de diagnostic pré-opératoire, une chirurgie radicale peut être pratiquée de manière inadéquate et se révéler particulièrement délabrante en raison du caractère adhérent et diffusément inflammatoire de la lésion. Le traitement de choix est une antibiothérapie au long cours amenant à une résolution clinique et radiologique complète dans la majorité des cas. Nous rapportons le cas d'une patiente de 27 ans chez laquelle un diagnostic de néoplasie rectale primitive est suggéré cliniquement et radiologiquement, mais chez qui les biopsies pré-opératoires limitées ont permis un diagnostic d'actinomycose pelvienne et un traitement conservateur.


Subject(s)
Actinomycosis/diagnosis , Pelvic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Pelvis
5.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 43(4): 689-695, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27889197

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Totally implantable venous access port systems are widely used in oncology, with frequent complications that sometimes necessitate device removal. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the time interval between port placement and initiation of chemotherapy and the neutropenia-inducing potential of the chemotherapy administered upon complication-related port removal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2013, 4045 consecutive patients were included in this observational, single-center prospective study. The chemotherapy regimens were classified as having a low (<10%), intermediate (10-20%), or high (>20%) risk for inducing neutropenia. RESULTS: The overall removal rate due to complications was 7.2%. Among them, port-related infection (2.5%) and port expulsion (1%) were the most frequent. The interval between port insertion and its first use was shown to be a predictive factor for complication-related removal rates. A cut-off of 6 days was statistically significant (p = 0.008), as the removal rate for complications was 9.4% when this interval was 0-5 days and 5.7% when it was ≥6 days. Another factor associated with port complication rate was the neutropenia-inducing potential of the chemotherapy regimens used, with removal for complications involved in 5.5% of low-risk regimens versus 9.4% for the intermediate- and high-risk regimens (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: An interval of 6 days between placement and first use of the port reduces the removal rate from complications. The intermediate- and high-risk for neutropenia chemotherapy regimens are related to higher port removal rates from complications than low-risk regimens.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Failure/statistics & numerical data , Foreign-Body Migration/epidemiology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Vascular Access Devices , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheter Obstruction/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hematoma/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Implantation , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...