ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Accurate response assessment is essential for evaluating new cancer treatments. We evaluated the impact of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and tumor shape on response assessment in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 19 patients with metastatic esophageal cancer in a phase II trial of bryostatin-1 and paclitaxel, response was retrospectively assessed for 89 lesions with RECIST and WHO criteria on baseline and serial follow-up CT scans. The eccentricity factor (EF) was introduced for measuring the degree to which tumor shape diverges from a perfect sphere [EF = radical1-(LPD/MD)(2), where LPD is the largest perpendicular diameter and MD is the maximal diameter]. RESULTS: The disagreement rate in best overall response categorization between RECIST (unidimensional) and WHO (bidimensional) criteria was 26.3%. Change in eccentricity was significantly greater (P < 0.01) for patients with disagreement (mean 0.31, range 0-0.91). When the short axis was used for unidimensional lymph node measurement, disagreement between WHO and RECIST lessened. CONCLUSIONS: Response assessment by WHO and RECIST differs substantially. Greater change in eccentricity is associated with greater discordance between WHO and RECIST. The discordance between WHO and RECIST may impact on how effective a therapy is judged to be.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Bryostatins , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms/pathology , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Twenty patients with known primary untreated and recurrent bone and soft tissue tumors underwent thallium imaging and three-phase bone imaging in the same session. The ratio of thallium uptake in the tumor tissue to the contralateral normal tissue areas was compared with the same ratio for phase 1 (blood flow or arterial phase), phase 2 (blood pool), and phase 3 (delayed medroxy-diphosphonate, MDP, uptake). There was poor correlation between Tl uptake and phases 1 and 3 of the bone scan ratios; r = 0.37 and 0.46; P = 0.097 and 0.047, respectively. The thallium uptake ratios correlated well with blood pool ratios (phase 2) (r = 0.84 and P less than 0.01). In contrast to uptake into normal muscle, Tl-201 uptake into tumor is not highly dependent on blood flow alone and other factors predominate in determining its magnitude.
