Anatomical variations of the hepatic artery: a closer view of rare unclassified variants.

BACKGROUND: Defining the hepatic artery anatomy is of great importance for both surgeons and radiologists. Michel classification was designed to classify hepatic artery variations. Nevertheless, there are variations that do not fit into this classification. In this study, we aim to define the incidence of all variations in a healthy liver donor by reviewing their computed tomography (CT) scan with special emphasis on variations that do not fit in any of the Michel classes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CT scan of donors and potential liver donors who were evaluated by triphasic CT scan. The CT scans were reviewed independently by a radiologist and two transplant surgeons. Cases that did not fit in any of the Michel classes were classified as class 0. RESULTS: Out of 241 donors, 210 were classified within the Michel classification, of which 60.9% were class I and 9.1% class II. Thirty-one (12.9%) donors classified as class 0. Of which, nine, three, two and three had replaced right hepatic artery from pancreaticoduodenal artery, gastroduodenal artery, aorta and coeliac artery, respectively. Two and six donors had accessory right hepatic artery from pancreaticoduodenal artery and gastroduodenal artery, respectively. Segment 4 artery originated from left and right hepatic artery in 56.8% and 31.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A great caution should be taken when evaluating the hepatic artery anatomy, clinicians should anticipate and be familiar with the rare unclassified variations of the hepatic artery.

Three Consequent Pediatric Liver Transplant Deaths in the COVID-19 Era.

The effect of COVID-19 on the transplant recipients is not well-established. Many reports underestimate the effect of COVID-19 on the immunosuppressed population. Herein, we report on 3 pediatric liver transplant recipients who were transplanted at our center between February 11 and March 10, 2020-during the COVID-19 pandemic era. The 3 patients aged between 5 and 10 months, had a rapid and aggressive respiratory deterioration that necessitated mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal life support; and eventually died. The clinical and pathological pictures likely represent COVID-19 pneumonia. Chest x-rays showed progressive infiltrates. Lung autopsies showed diffuse alveolar damage in two cases. We concluded that COVID-19 is very likely to have catastrophic effects on transplant recipients.

Beliefs of Living Donors About Recipients' End-Stage Liver Failure and Surgery for Organ Donation.

BACKGROUND: The concept of beliefs could provide a basis for how donors may perceive recipients' end-stage liver failure (ESLF) and surgery for organ donation. However, there is no such quantitative study. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore beliefs of living donors about recipients' ESLF and surgery for organ donation. METHODS: The sample comprised 16 living donors who donated a part of their liver to a patient who had ESLF. The data were analyzed by following established procedures for inductive qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Analysis showed that donors' beliefs can be viewed in a number of groups. Beliefs about recipients' ESLF included diverse explanations for ESLF (blaming oneself and physicians) and physical symptoms (developmental slowing down). Beliefs about being a donor included reasons for being a donor (performing a good deed, being healed), barriers to being a donor (other people being ignorant and selfish), ways to manage these barriers (following one's gut feeling), and factors facilitating being a donor (the feeling that one does not have many people to leave behind). Beliefs about surgery for organ donation included physical effects (pain, feeling stiff). Beliefs about organ donation included views that general organ donation should be encouraged and that people's awareness should be raised. CONCLUSIONS: Existing psychological perspectives could help to interpret some beliefs. Nevertheless, other beliefs, not previously reported, could be considered as targets for individual consultations/psycho-educational programs for fostering emotional well-being.

Liver Transplantation: Recipients' Evaluation of Life From the Perspective of Living Donors.

AIM: Liver transplantation affects not only recipients and living donors' lives, but also the nature and quality of their relationship. Moreover, the ways in which recipients of liver transplant experience life and views of living donors on how recipients experience life may differ. These differences may account for relational changes. It is also important to understand how recipients and their living donors' views differ if the aim is to devise psychoeducational programs for recipients and living donors. Therefore, the present study examined the recipients' experience of life after a diagnosis of end-stage liver failure (ESLF) and transplantation surgery from donors' perspective. METHODS: The sample consisted of 16 living donors who donated a part of their liver to a patient with ESLF. Thematic analysis was undertaken in parallel with interviews during which an interview guide was followed. FINDINGS: Donors felt that recipients evaluated life after the diagnosis of ESLF and transplantation surgery in terms of limitations, mixed relationships, emotional changes, and improvement in life. CONCLUSION: Experience of social limitations, negative emotions, and the feeling that one is supported by others could be interpreted in terms of existing psychological theory. Some ways of adjusting that have not been reported before within the context of ESLF extended the literature. These included others being frightened of being infected by ESLF and being insensitive, experience of positive emotions, and ways of improving. Overall, compared with findings of previous qualitative work among recipients, our findings suggest that donors' evaluation of recipients' lives converge with that of recipients.

Living donor liver transplantation: a life-saving option in emergency situations for diffuse hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastasis.

Liver metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), but only 10%-20% of metastasis in these cases is resectable at the time of diagnosis. In some cases, medical and interventional radiological treatments may not be effective. Liver transplantation, although controversial, may be an option. Worldwide organ-sharing systems do not provide exception points, but give recommendations for liver transplantation in cases of hepatic metastasis from GEP-NETs due to the issue of fair access to donor organs. Living donor liver transplantation is an option in select cases. Presented here are 2 cases in which living donor liver transplantation was performed in emergency situations as a life-saving procedure, with acceptable survival and without donor complications.

Acquired factor XI deficiency: a rare complication after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A majority of coagulation factors are synthesized in the liver. Factor XI (FXI) deficiency (Rosenthal syndrome) is one of the rare inherited coagulation disorders with an extremely low risk of transmission by liver transplantation (LT). CASE REPORT: We report here the case of a 50-year-old man who unknowingly acquired FXI deficiency by LT. During 1 year of post-transplant follow-up, his activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) remained prolonged, but he did not develop bleeding complications. The patient required retransplantation due to chronic rejection and is currently doing well 4 years after his first liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a prolonged aPTT in a deceased donor should raise suspicion for the presence of rare coagulation factor deficiencies. During urgent, lifesaving procedures such as LT, it may be impossible to avoid transmission. Awareness of this possibility will allow early detection and management.

What has changed in pediatric kidney transplantation in Turkey? Experience of an evolving center.

INTRODUCTION: Reluctance to perform kidney transplantations on children is an ongoing problem in Turkey. Moreover, urological pathologies still constitute the largest portion of the underlying etiologies in chronic renal failure patients. Herein, we retrospective analyzed the data acquired from our pediatric renal transplantation patients and reviewed the registry of dialysis and transplantation data prepared by the Turkish Society of Nephrology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six living donor kidney transplantations were performed in children between 2008 and 2012. Seventeen of 46 (37%) transplantations were preemptive. The mean age at operation time was 10.8 ± 5 years. The mean patient weight was 31.3 ± 15.8 kg (range, 9.4 to 66.4 kg). A detailed urologic evaluation was performed for every child with an underlying lower urinary tract disease. One enterocystoplasty and 2 ureterocystoplasties were performed for augmentation of the bladder, simultaneously. RESULTS: One-year death-censored graft survival and patient survival rates were 100% and 97.8%, respectively. The mean serum creatinine level was 0.86 ± 0.32 mg/dL (range, 0.3 to 1.8 mg/dL). None of the patients had vascular complications or acute tubular necrosis. One patient suffered graft-versus-host disease during the second month after renal transplantation and died with a functioning graft. In one patient with massive proteinuria detected after transplantation, recurrence of primary disease (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis) was considered and the patient was treated successfully with plasmapheresis. One child had an acute cellular rejection and was administered pulse steroid treatment. CONCLUSION: Although challenging, all patients in all pediatric age groups can successfully be operated and managed. With careful surgical technique, close postoperative follow-up, and efforts by the experienced and respectful surgical teams in this country, we could change the negative trends toward perform kidney transplantation in the Turkish pediatric population.

Eculizumab for salvage treatment of refractory antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant patients: case reports.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in a group of preoperatively desensitized patients may follow a dreadful course and result in loss of the transplanted kidney. In several cases, conventional therapies including plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-CD 20 therapy can resolve AMR successfully. But in some cases the load of immunoglobulins that can activate complement cascade may submerge the routine desensitization therapy and result in the formation of membrane attack complexes. Eculizumab, monoclonal antibody against C5, was reported to be an option in cases with severe AMR that are resistant to conventional therapy. Here, we present two cases of acute-onset AMR in preoperatively desensitized patients. Eculizumab was used as a salvage agent in addition to conventional therapy. Given the bad prognosis for renal transplants displaying acute injury progressing rapidly to cortical necrosis on the biopsy, the prompt use of eculizumab could have the advantage of immediate effects by stopping cellular injury. This can provide a therapeutic window to allow conventional treatment modalities to be effective and prevent early graft loss.

The impact of donor variables on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C.

Morphologic characteristics of the graft have been proposed as a major contributor to the long-term outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Our objective was to determine the impact of donor variables, including donor age, donor-recipient HLA match, and type of donation (DCD vs donation after brain death [DBD]), on the outcome of OLT in 192 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Fourteen patients underwent OLT from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors and 188 from DBD donors. Mean donor age, warm ischemia time at recovery, and cold ischemia time were similar between the groups. Overall graft survival rate at 1 year (55% DCD vs 85% DBD) and 5 years (46% DCD vs 78% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0003). Similarly, patient survival rate at 1 year (62% DCD vs 93% DBD) and 5 years (62% DCD vs 82% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0295). Incidences of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and primary nonfunction were similar between the DCD and DBD groups. The incidence of liver abscess with ischemic-type biliary stricture was higher in recipients from DCD as compared with DBD (42% vs 2%). A trend toward lower graft survival was noted in recipients from donors older than 60 years of age in the HCV population (P = .07), with statistically lower patient survival (P = .02). Donor- recipient HLA matching did not appear to correlate with OLT outcome in patients with HCV. DCD donors and donors older than 60 years of age significantly impact patient and graft survival. Lower graft and patient survival in recipients from DCD donors does not appear to be related to early disease recurrence.

Cadaveric liver transplantation in biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome with the absence of retrohepatic inferior vena cava, preduodenal portal vein, and intestinal malrotation: a case report.

A 9-month-old female infant with biliary atresia underwent cadaveric liver transplantation due to progressive cholestatic hepatitis following a Kasai operation. She had biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome (BASM) composed of an absent retrohepatic inferior vena cava with an azygous connection, preduodenal portal vein, polysplenia, and intestinal malrotation. A portal vein thrombosis developed on the 4th postoperative day requiring immediate treatment by thrombectomy. The patient is well with normal liver function at 3 months follow-up. Although BASM may render the transplantation more difficult, the presence of BASM is no longer a contraindication to liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation in pediatric patients: twenty years of experience at the University of Wisconsin.

Developments in surgical technique, immunosuppression, organ procurement and preservation, and patient selection criteria have resulted in improved long-term patient and graft survival after pediatric liver transplantation. In this study, we examined the results of 196 liver transplants performed in 155 pediatric patients at University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups according to age at the time of liver transplant. Infants under 12 months of age comprised Group 1 (n=74) and children from one to 18 yr comprised Group 2 (n=122). Outcomes for whole, reduced-size, and split liver transplantation were compared in infants and children. Biliary atresia was the most common indication in both groups. Patients underwent 128 whole size, 50 reduced size, and 18 split liver transplants. Forty-one retransplantations were performed in 14 infants (18.9%) and in 27 children (22.1%). One hundred eleven patients (56.6%) had one or more rejection episode [37 infants (50.0%) and 74 children (60.6%)]. Thirty-nine patients (19.8%) developed CMV infections, 42 (21.4%) developed EBV infections, and 14 developed PTLD (six infants and eight children). Thirty-six patients (18.3%) developed HAT. Seven patients (4.5%) developed malignancy (one infant and six children). Out of 155 patients, 33 (21.3%) died during the study period. The most common etiology of mortality included central nervous system pathology (n=7; 4.5%), sepsis (n=6; 3.8%), and cardiac causes (n=6; 3.8%). One-, five-, and 10-yr actuarial patient survival was 86, 79, and 74% in infants and 90, 83 and 80% in children. Graft survival at one, five, and 10 yr was 77, 73 and 71% in infants and 88, 81 and 78% in children, respectively. Despite its technical challenges, the outcomes of liver transplantation in pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease are excellent and result in significant long-term patient and graft survival.

Once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation: 1-year post-conversion in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients.

The pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (tacrolimus extended-release formulation; XL formerly referred to as MR or MR4) were assessed in 18 stable pediatric liver transplant recipients who were converted from the twice-a-day formulation of tacrolimus (TAC) to XL. Patients received their twice-a-day dose of TAC on study days 1 through 7. Beginning on the morning of study day 8, patients were converted to XL on a 1:1 (mg:mg) basis for their total daily dose, and were maintained on a once-daily AM dosing regimen using the same therapeutic monitoring and patient care techniques employed with TAC. Based on pharmacokinetic profiles obtained on study days 7 (TAC) and 14 (XL), steady state exposure (AUC(0-24)) was equivalent between XL and TAC; the mean XL/TAC ratio for lnAUC(0-24) was 100.9% (90% CI: 90.8%, 112.1%). AUC(0-24) and C(min) were strongly correlated at steady state (correlation coefficient: XL 0.90, TAC 0.94). During the first year post-conversion, there were no cases of acute rejection, discontinuation of XL, graft loss or death. The safety profile of XL was consistent with that known for TAC. These results support the safe and convenient conversion of pediatric liver transplant recipients from twice-a-day TAC to once-daily XL.

Conversion of stable liver transplant recipients from a twice-daily Prograf-based regimen to a once-daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen.

INTRODUCTION: Modified release (MR) tacrolimus is an extended release formulation administered once daily. The purpose of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate tacrolimus exposure in stable liver transplant recipients converted from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus once daily. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter study with a single sequence, four-period crossover design. Eligible patients were 18 to 65 years of age, >6 months posttransplant with stable renal and hepatic function and receiving stable doses of Prograf twice a day for >2 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients received Prograf twice a day on days 1 to 14 and 29 to 42. Patients were converted to the same milligram-for-milligram daily dose of MR once daily on days 15 to 28 and 43 to 56. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles were obtained on days 14, 28, 42, and 56. Laboratory and safety parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 70 patients, 62 completed all four PK profiles. The AUC0-24 of tacrolimus was comparable for Prograf twice a day (days 14 and 42) and MR tacrolimus once daily (days 28 and 56). The 90% confidence intervals for MR tacrolimus versus Prograf at steady state (days 28 and 56 vs days 14 and 42) was 0.85 to 0.92 for AUC0-24. MR tacrolimus was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of Prograf. AUC0-24 was highly correlated to Cmin for Prograf (day 14, r = .93; Day 42, r = .89) and for MR tacrolimus (day 28, r = .93; day 56, r = .92). Renal and liver function remained stable. One patient experienced acute rejection. CONCLUSION: The steady-state tacrolimus exposure of MR tacrolimus once daily is equivalent to Prograf twice a day after a milligram-for-milligram conversion in stable liver transplant recipients.

Chlamydia pneumoniae-infected monocytes exhibit increased adherence to human aortic endothelial cells.

Interactions between monocytes and endothelial cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, and monocyte adhesion to arterial endothelium is one of the earliest events in atherogenesis. Work presented in this study examined human monocyte adherence to primary human aortic endothelial cells following monocyte infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae, an intracellular pathogen associated with atherosclerosis by a variety of sero-epidemiological, pathological and functional studies. Infected monocytes exhibited enhanced adhesion to aortic endothelial cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Pre-treatment of C. pneumoniae with heat did not effect the organism's capacity to enhance monocyte adhesion, suggesting that heat-stable chlamydial antigens such as chlamydial lipopolysaccharide (cLPS) mediated monocyte adherence. Indeed, treatment of monocytes with cLPS was sufficient to increase monocyte adherence to endothelial cells, and increased adherence of infected or cLPS-treated monocytes could be inhibited by the LPS antagonist lipid X. Moreover, C. pneumoniae-induced adherence could be inhibited by incubating monocytes with a mAb specific to the human beta 2-integrin chain, suggesting that enhanced adherence resulted from increased expression of these adhesion molecules. These data show that C. pneumoniae can enhance the capacity of monocytes to adhere to primary human aortic endothelial cells. The enhanced adherence exhibited by infected monocytes may increase monocyte residence time in vascular sites with reduced wall shear stress and promote entry of infected cells into lesion-prone locations.

Human liver allograft acceptance and the "tolerance assay": in vitro anti-donor T cell assays show hyporeactivity to donor cells, but unlike DTH, fail to detect linked suppression.

Human allograft acceptance is associated with immune regulation, characterized by donor-antigen-linked suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH). We wished to determine if "classical" in vitro assays of alloreactivity could also detect linked suppression and thus be useful in the clinical diagnosis of active immune regulation. We analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a group of eight liver transplant recipients, one of whom had stopped all immunosuppression 4.5 years ago yet continues to have good graft function (graft acceptor). The regulator phenotype was defined as the ability to suppress a DTH response to a recall antigen in the presence of donor antigen. Using the trans vivo DTH test, we identified four regulators, and four nonregulators. When we tested two of the regulators for in vitro mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses to B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCL), we found both patients to be specifically hyporesponsive to donor compared with third-party B-LCL stimulators. However, in contrast to the linked suppression of DTH seen when a given B-LCL expressed donor-type HLA-B antigens, there was no evidence of linked suppression in vitro, either in CTL, proliferative, or interferon-gamma cytokine release assays. The primary CTL hyporesponsiveness to donor B-LCL could not be reversed by neutralizing antibodies to transforming growth factor beta or interleukin-10, which could restore a strong DTH response to donor B-LCL. We conclude that DTH analysis can readily detect donor antigen-linked suppression in liver transplant recipients. CTL and MLC tests failed to do so. These findings may be relevant to the development of a tolerance assay suitable for use in clinical trials.

A randomized double-blind comparative study of mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids in primary liver transplant recipients.

Acute hepatic allograft rejection occurs in approximately 50% to 60% of the patients undergoing liver transplantation. In this study, we compared the rate of acute rejection in liver transplant recipients randomized in a double-blind comparative study to treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA), both in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Five hundred sixty-five primary liver transplant recipients were randomly assigned to treatment with MMF, 1 g twice daily intravenously followed by 1.5 g twice daily orally (n = 278), or AZA, 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg/d intravenously followed by oral administration (n = 287), in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year, and efficacy analysis was based on intent-to-treat methods. Acute rejection was defined according to the Banff histological criteria. The two study groups were balanced for demographic and clinical baseline characteristics. The incidence of acute rejection or graft loss was 47.7% in the AZA patients and 38.5% in the MMF patients (P <.03). The incidence of biopsy-proven and treated rejection censoring for graft loss was 40.0% in the AZA group versus 31.0% in the MMF group (P <.06). Steroid-resistant rejection requiring treatment with either OKT3 or antithymocyte globulin occurred in 8.2% of AZA patients versus 3.8% in MMF patients (P <.02). Patient and graft survival rates at 1 year posttransplantation were 85.4% in the AZA group and 85.3% in the MMF group (P = not significant). MMF was superior to AZA in preventing acute rejection in the first 6 months posttransplantation. MMF and AZA were equivalent in preventing graft loss at 1 year, and the safety profiles between the two immunosuppressive agents were similar.

Living-unrelated renal transplantation at the University of Wisconsin.

Since 1984, we have performed 243 living-unrelated renal transplants at the University of Wisconsin. Rejection occurred in 47% of the patients. Graft loss occurred in 59 patients and 39 patients died. Graft survival in LURD transplants at 10 years is 54% and 43% at 15 years. Patient survival is 68% at 10 years and 54% at 15 years. These long-term results demonstrate that LURD is equivalent to haploidentical renal transplantation and superior to cadaveric transplantation. Husband-to-wife donation demonstrated improved graft survival when compared with wife-to-husband and nonspousal donation. Living-unrelated renal transplantation has been utilized successfully at the University of Wisconsin and may help to alleviate the donor shortage.

Analysis of tumor characteristics and survival in liver transplant recipients with incidentally diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma.

The use of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has generally become restricted to carefully selected cases of small oligocentric tumors. However, it is not uncommon to find previously undetected HCC within recipient cirrhotic livers at the time of hepatectomy. The impact of unsuspected HCC on patient outcomes remains unclear. A retrospective analysis of our institutional experience with adult primary OLTX was performed comparing recipients with incidental HCC (group 1), recipients with known or suspected HCC (group 2), and recipients confirmed by pathologic examination to be tumor free (group 3). Between 1984 and 2000, 27 patients in group 1, 12 patients in group 2, and 612 patients in group 3 underwent primary OLTX. Tumors were smaller (P = 0.0172) in group 1 than in group 2; however, the number of tumors and the histologic findings were similar in the groups. Incidence of bilobar involvement, vascular invasion, portal vein tumor thrombus, lymphatic involvement, and distant metastasis at the time of OLTX did not differ significantly between these groups. Four-year patient survival appeared to be lower in group 1 (70.0%) than in group 3 (79.0%) (P = 0.0546); 4-year patient survival was significantly worse in group 2 (31.0%) compared to group 3 (P = 0.0106). Thus, in our experience, incidentally diagnosed cases of HCC possess many of the same features of malignancy as preoperatively diagnosed HCC. Indeed, patient survival after OLTX appears to be adversely affected by the presence of incidental HCC.

Liver transplantation from controlled non-heart-beating donors.

BACKGROUND: The use of organs from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) has been proposed as one way to increase the donor pool. However, few centers have transplanted livers from NHBDs. We report here the results of 19 liver transplants from controlled NHBDs. METHODS: From January 1993 through August 1999, 364 liver transplantations were performed from heart-beating donors (HBDs) and 19 liver transplantations were performed from NHBDs. Donor and recipient characteristics, posttransplant complications, and patient and allograft survival were compared. RESULTS: No differences in hepatic artery, portal vein, or biliary complications were noted between the groups. However, the rate of primary nonfunction was higher in recipients of livers from NHBDs (10.5% vs. 1.3%; P = .04). No difference in patient survival was seen between recipients of NHBDs or HBDs (72.6% vs. 84.8%; P =.36); however, allograft survival was lower in recipients who received livers from NHBDs (53.8% vs. 80.9%; P =.007). CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation from controlled NHBDs results in similar patient survival and post-transplant complications. However, primary nonfunction was higher and allograft survival was less in recipients of livers from NHBDs. The results of liver transplantation from controlled NHBDs are encouraging and should continue to be cautiously pursued as one way to help alleviate the current shortage of donor livers.