Pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib in plasma and synovial fluid.

BACKGROUND: Lumiracoxib is a new cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor in development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and acute pain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib in plasma and knee joint synovial fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Open-label multiple-dose study evaluating the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib in plasma and synovial fluid after 7 days of treatment with lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily. PATIENT POPULATION: Males and females aged 18-75 years with rheumatoid arthritis, having moderate to significant synovial fluid effusion of the knee. OUTCOME MEASURES: Following a 7-day washout period for previous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 22 patients (17 female, 5 male) received lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily for seven consecutive days. On day 7, following an overnight fast, a final dose of lumiracoxib was administered and serial blood and synovial fluid samples were collected for up to 28 hours. Lumiracoxib and its metabolites (4'-hydroxy-lumiracoxib and 5-carboxy-4'-hydroxy-lumiracoxib) were measured by validated high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib were evaluated in plasma and synovial fluid by both a population pharmacokinetic model and noncompartmental analysis. RESULTS: Lumiracoxib was rapidly absorbed (peak plasma concentration at 2 hours) and the terminal elimination half-life in plasma was short (6 hours). Lumiracoxib concentrations were initially higher in plasma than in synovial fluid; however, from 5 hours after administration until the end of the 28-hour assessment period, concentrations of lumiracoxib were higher in synovial fluid than in plasma. Peak drug concentration in synovial fluid occurred 3-4 hours later than the peak plasma concentration. The mean steady-state trough concentration of lumiracoxib in synovial fluid (454 microg/L) was approximately three times higher than the mean value in plasma (155 microg/L), and the area under the concentration-time curve from 12 to 24 hours after administration was 2.6-fold higher for synovial fluid than for plasma. Median lumiracoxib protein binding was similar in plasma and synovial fluid (range 97.9-98.3%). Concentrations of 4'-hydroxy-lumiracoxib, the active COX-2 selective metabolite, remained low in comparison with parent drug in both plasma and synovial fluid. The concentration of lumiracoxib in synovial fluid at 24 hours after administration would be expected to result in substantial inhibition of prostaglandin E(2) formation. CONCLUSION: The kinetics of distribution of lumiracoxib in synovial fluid are likely to extend the therapeutic action of the drug beyond that expected from plasma pharmacokinetics. These data support the use of lumiracoxib in a once-daily regimen for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Concomitant administration of lumiracoxib and a triphasic oral contraceptive does not affect contraceptive activity or pharmacokinetic profile.

This study evaluated the effect of lumiracoxib on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN) in Triphasil-28 (a triphasic oral contraceptive). Females stabilized on Triphasil-28 continued on Triphasil-28 alone for another month (Treatment Period 1), then also received lumiracoxib (400 mg daily) or placebo for 28 days each (Periods 2 and 3) in a double-blind crossover design. Plasma pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed on Day 21 of Periods 2 and 3. Progesterone and plasma sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were measured before and 2 hours after Triphasil-28 administration on Day 21 of all three treatment periods. Lumiracoxib had no significant effect on EE or LN pharmacokinetics or on progesterone or SHBG concentrations, indicating that anovulation and Triphasil-28 effectiveness was maintained. Adverse events were similar for lumiracoxib and placebo. Therefore, no clinically important consequences are anticipated if lumiracoxib is coadministered with oral contraceptives containing EE or LN.

Differential influence of two cyclosporine formulations on everolimus pharmacokinetics: a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction.

Everolimus is an immunosuppressant intended for use with cyclosporine in acute-rejection prophylaxis following organ transplantation. The possibility of a drug interaction of cyclosporine on everolimus was assessed. In this randomized, two-period, crossover study, 24 healthy subjects received a single oral dose of 2 mg everolimus alone and with one of two cyclosporine formulations: either 175 mg Neoral or 300 mg Sandimmune. The single doses of Neoral and Sandimmune were chosen to yield similar average areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Treatments were separated by a 14-day washout period. Cyclosporine AUCs were similar for both formulations (p = 0.53), whereas the peak concentration (Cmax) was significantly higher for Neoral (p = 0.02). Simultaneous administration of Neoral with everolimus increased everolimus Cmax and AUC by 82% and 168%, respectively (p = 0.0001). Coadministration of Sandimmune with everolimus did not affect everolimus Cmax (p = 0.59) but increased everolimus AUC by 74% on average (p = 0.0001). Everolimus elimination half-lives were unchanged in the presence of both cyclosporine formulations. The everolimus AUC increase with Neoral coadministration was significantly greater than the AUC increase with Sandimmune (p = 0.008). However, there was no apparent association between cyclosporine Cmax and the change in everolimus AUC with cyclosporine coadministration. If Neoral or Sandimmune is removed from an everolimus-cyclosporine immunosuppressive regimen, a two- to three-fold decrease in everolimus exposure is expected. Therapeutic monitoring of everolimus concentrations would be helpful after the removal of cyclosporine to individually titrate everolimus exposure.