Novel radiation quality metrics accounting for proton energy spectra for RBE proton models.

BACKGROUND: For proton therapy, a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is widely applied clinically. However, due to abundant evidence of variable RBE in vitro, and as suggested in studies of patient outcomes, RBE might increase by the end of the proton tracks, as described by several proposed variable RBE models. Typically, the dose averaged linear energy transfer ( LET d $\text{LET}_d$ ) has been used as a radiation quality metric (RQM) for these models. However, the optimal choice of RQM has not been fully explored. PURPOSE: This study aims to propose novel RQMs that effectively weight protons of different energies, and assess their predictive power for variable RBE in proton therapy. The overall objective is to identify an RQM that better describes the contribution of individual particles to the RBE of proton beams. METHODS: High-throughput experimental set-ups of in vitro cell survival studies for proton RBE determination are simulated utilizing the SHIELD-HIT12A Monte Carlo particle transport code. For every data point, the proton energy spectra are simulated, allowing the calculation of novel RQMs by applying different power levels to the spectra of LET or effective Q $Q$ ( Q eff $Q_\mathrm{eff}$ ) values. A phenomenological linear-quadratic-based RBE model is then applied to the in vitro data, using various RQMs as input variables, and the model performance is evaluated by root-mean-square-error (RMSE) for the logarithm of cell surviving fractions of each data point. RESULTS: Increasing the power level, that is, putting an even higher weight on higher LET particles when constructing the RQM is generally associated with an increased model performance, with dose averaged LET 3 $\text{LET}^3$ (i.e., dose averaged cubed LET, cLET d $\mathrm{cLET}_d$ ) resulting in a RMSE value 0.31, compared to 0.45 for a model based on (linearly weighted) LET d $\text{LET}_d$ , with similar trends also observed for track averaged and Q eff $Q_\mathrm{eff}$ -based RQMs. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that improved proton variable RBE models can be constructed assuming a non-linear RBE(LET) relationship for individual protons. If similar trends hold also for an in vitro-environment, variable RBE effects are likely better described by cLET d $\mathrm{cLET}_d$ or tracked averaged cubed LET ( cLET t $\mathrm{cLET}_t$ ), or corresponding Q eff $Q_\mathrm{eff}$ -based RQM, rather than linearly weighted LET d $\text{LET}_d$ or LET t $\text{LET}_t$ which is conventionally applied today.

Modeling RBE with other quantities than LET significantly improves prediction of in vitro cell survival for proton therapy.

BACKGROUND: For proton therapy, a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 has broadly been applied clinically. However, as unexpected toxicities have been observed by the end of the proton tracks, variable RBE models have been proposed. Typically, the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd ) has been used as an input variable for these models but the way the LETd was defined, calculated, or determined was not always consistent, potentially impacting the corresponding RBE value. PURPOSE: This study compares consistently calculated LETd with other quantities as input variables for a phenomenological RBE model and attempts to determine which quantity that can best predicts proton RBE. The comparison was performed within the frame of introducing a new model for the proton RBE. METHODS: High-throughput experimental setups of in vitro cell survival studies for proton RBE determination are simulated using the SHIELD-HIT12A Monte Carlo particle transport code. Together with LET, z ∗ 2 / ß 2 $z^{*2}/\beta ^2$ , here called effective Q (Qeff ), and Q are scored. Each quantity is calculated using the dose and track averaging methods, because the scoring includes all hadronic particles, all protons or only primaries. A phenomenological linear-quadratic-based RBE model is subsequently applied to the in vitro data with the various beam quality descriptors used as input variables and the goodness of fit is determined and compared using a bootstrapping approach. Both linear and nonlinear fit functions were tested. RESULTS: Versions of Qeff and Q outperform LET with a statistically significant margin, with the best nonlinear and linear fit having a relative root mean square error (RMSE) for RBE2Gy ± one standard error of 1.55 ± 0.04 (Qeff, t, primary ) and 2.84 ± 0.07 (Qeff, d, primary ), respectively. For comparison, the corresponding best nonlinear and linear fits for LETd, all protons had a relative RMSE of 2.07 ± 0.06 and 3.39 ± 0.08, respectively. Applying Welch's t-test for comparing the calculated RMSE of RBE2Gy resulted in two-tailed p-values of <0.002 for all Q and Qeff quantities compared to LETd, all protons . CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that Q or Qeff could be better RBE descriptors that dose averaged LET.

A systematic review on the usage of averaged LET in radiation biology for particle therapy.

Linear Energy Transfer (LET) is widely used to express the radiation quality of ion beams, when characterizing the biological effectiveness. However, averaged LET may be defined in multiple ways, and the chosen definition may impact the resulting reported value. We review averaged LET definitions found in the literature, and quantify which impact using these various definitions have for different reference setups. We recorded the averaged LET definitions used in 354 publications quantifying the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of hadronic beams, and investigated how these various definitions impact the reported averaged LET using a Monte Carlo particle transport code. We find that the kind of averaged LET being applied is, generally, poorly defined. Some definitions of averaged LET may influence the reported averaged LET values up to an order of magnitude. For publications involving protons, most applied dose averaged LET when reporting RBE. The absence of what target medium is used and what secondary particles are included further contributes to an ill-defined averaged LET. We also found evidence of inconsistent usage of averaged LET definitions when deriving LET-based RBE models. To conclude, due to commonly ill-defined averaged LET and to the inherent problems of LET-based RBE models, averaged LET may only be used as a coarse indicator of radiation quality. We propose a more rigorous way of reporting LET values, and suggest that ideally the entire particle fluence spectra should be recorded and provided for future RBE studies, from which any type of averaged LET (or other quantities) may be inferred.