Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 19(1): e0297580, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271329

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly affected blood donors worldwide. It is important for the blood service to return to its pre-pandemic level as soon as possible and to perform its functions fully. This study compared the donation and demographic profiles of blood and its component donors one year before and during three pandemic years in Lithuania. All blood and blood component donations (n = 413,358) and demographic characteristics of all donors from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2023, were analyzed. All data were obtained from annual publications, and statistics were obtained from the Blood Donor Register. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Following a 9.41 percent decrease in the first year of the pandemic, the quantity of blood and blood component donations increased by 3.49 percent in the third year compared to the pre-pandemic year. Throughout the three years of the pandemic, a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of first-time blood and blood component donations was observed. Both the number and proportion of donations by donors under 25 years old decreased during the pandemic. The proportion of pre-donation deferrals for all attempts to donate significantly decreased during the pandemic. There was a statistically significant lower prevalence of all positive transfusion-transmitted infectious (TTI) markers among all donations compared to the pre-pandemic year for all three pandemic years. The odds for hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and all TTI markers during the second and third pandemic years were significantly lower than those in the pre-pandemic year. In conclusion, most dimensions of blood and its component donations and donor characteristics have returned to pre-pandemic levels or show positive trends. However, the major concern is the remaining decrease in donations from first-time and donors under 25 years old.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hepatitis C , Transfusion Reaction , Humans , Adult , Blood Donation , Lithuania/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Blood Donors , Transfusion Reaction/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks
2.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0277650, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36378657

ABSTRACT

Lithuania has a long history of remunerated donations. The first steps towards voluntary, non-remunerated blood and blood component donations started in 2004. Lithuania achieved 99.98% voluntary non-remunerated donations (VNRDs) in 2020. This study aimed to assess the risk of transfusion-transmitted infectious (TTI) disease markers for remunerated donations in comparison with VNRDs in Lithuania from 2013 to 2020. Data were obtained from the Lithuanian Blood Donor Register. The prevalence was calculated as the rate between the number of confirmed positive results for all TTI disease markers (serological anti-HCV, HBsAg, Ag/anti-HIV 1 and 2, and syphilis, and/or HCV, HBV, and HIV-1 NAT) per 100 donations. The relative risk of infectious disease markers for remunerated donations was then estimated. In total, 796310 donations were made. Altogether, 2743 donations were positive for TTI markers as follows: HCV, 1318; HBV, 768; syphilis, 583; and HIV 1 and 2, 74. The prevalence of confirmed TTI markers were 2.86, 0.97, 0.18, and 0.04 per 100 first-time remunerated donations, first-time VNRDs, repeat remunerated donations, and repeat VNRDs, respectively. Remunerated first-time and repeat donations had a statistically higher prevalence of TTI disease markers than VNRDs. First-time and repeat remunerated donations had statistically significantly higher relative risks of confirmed TTI disease markers than VNRD. In conclusion, the risks of TTI disease markers for remunerated first-time and repeat blood and its component donations are significantly higher than those for VNRDs.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , HIV Infections , HIV Seropositivity , HIV-1 , Syphilis , Transfusion Reaction , Humans , Blood Donors , Syphilis/epidemiology , Lithuania/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 619, 2022 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35534875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonattendance is a common problem worldwide. Important factors for nonattendance are a queue or the waiting time until the planned service. AIMS: The aims of this study were to identify the reasons for nonattendance to planned consultations, assess the waiting time from registration to access to an outpatient specialist consultation, and identify the associations between the reasons for nonattendance and the waiting time until the planned outpatient specialist consultation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on a phone questionnaire was conducted among patients not attending a planned consultation at the outpatient department of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Hospital in Kaunas, Lithuania. A total of 972 phone calls were made, and 389 telephone surveys were completed. RESULTS: The mean respondents' waiting time until the planned outpatient consultation was 15.13 ± 10 days. The highest proportion of nonattendance was observed when the wait time was between 6 and 17 days. More often, the patients did not attend the planned outpatient consultation due to worsened health status (24.69%), unidentified personal problems (14.91%), work-related problems (13.62%) and being unaware about the appointment (11.82%). A longer waiting time was significantly associated with the following reasons for nonattendance: work-related problems, health problems solved at another health care institution, unidentified personal problems and unknown reasons for nonattendance. The highest proportions of nonattending patients had consultations registered with neurologists (17.0%), traumatologists (11.3%) and cardiologists (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients did not identify the long waiting time until outpatient specialist consultation among the main reasons for nonattendance. The issue of waiting time is not an important aspect of nonattendance.


Subject(s)
Outpatients , Waiting Lists , Appointments and Schedules , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Referral and Consultation , Time Factors
4.
Inquiry ; 58: 469580211060304, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34928184

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Lithuania is one of the countries where public and private primary health care (PHC) providers compete for patients. Patients continuously shift from public to PHC providers, but an analysis of the main reasons was never performed. This study aimed to analyze the reasons why patients shift from public to private PHC providers and identify the associations between the reasons and demographic characteristics of the patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on a phone questionnaire was conducted among patients who shifted from public to private primary health care (PHC) providers. A total of 810 phone calls were made, and 572 telephone surveys were completed. The response rate was 70.49%. The difference between the proportions was assessed using the Z-test. The association between categorical variables was assessed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: The study identified the following main reasons: long queues to obtain family physician appointments (23.6%), inconvenient location of public's institution department (20.1%), patients relocating (19.2%), enrolment at a former family physician who transitioned from a public to private PHC institution (10.5%), and long waiting time at the family physician's office for the appointment (9.4%). Some statistically significant correlations were found between the specific reasons for shifting from public to private PHC organizations and patients' demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Personal reasons are the most common reasons for shifting from public to private PHC providers (43.36% of the respondents), following the reasons related exclusively to the family physician (25.17%) and related PHC institutions only (24.9%).


Subject(s)
Physicians, Family , Primary Health Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Lithuania , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Transfusion ; 55(10): 2489-98, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26013970

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen and antibody combination assays have been launched as a cost-effective alternative to nucleic acid testing (NAT) for reducing the antibody-negative window period (WP). Later, a HCV antigen chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) became available. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A panel composed of 337 HCV NAT-yield samples that were characterized for viral load (VL) and genotype was used to compare the sensitivity of two combination enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Monolisa, Bio-Rad; and Murex, formerly Abbott) and a HCV antigen CLIA (Abbott). Analytic sensitivity was compared with HCV RNA detection using Ultrio (Grifols) by testing serial dilutions of 10 genotype (gt)1 to gt4 samples. RESULTS: HCV antigen CLIA detected 92.4% of samples, whereas Monolisa and Murex detected 38.3 and 47.5%, respectively. In the HCV RNA VL range of 10(5) to 10(7) IU/mL, Monolisa and Murex detected 38% to 56% of gt1, 85% to 78% of gt2, and 21% to 37% of gt3. The overall geometric mean 50% limit of detection (range) of Ultrio on gt1 to gt4 dilution series was 3.5 (1.2-7.7) copies/mL, compared to 3.3 × 10(6) (4.4 × 10(5) -2.7 × 10(7) ), 3.4 × 10(6) (2.2 × 10(5) -4.2 × 10(7) ), and 2728 (415-7243) copies/mL for Monolisa, Murex, and HCV antigen CLIA, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analytical sensitivity of NAT was on average 1 million- and 780-fold higher than combination assays and HCV antigen CLIA, respectively. Relative sensitivities of combination assays differed for genotypes with Murex being more sensitive for gt1 and gt3 and Monolisa more sensitive for gt2. Although being less sensitive than NAT, combination assays could be considered in resource-limited settings since they detect 38% to 47% of seronegative WP donations.


Subject(s)
Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis C Antigens/blood , Hepatitis C/blood , Luminescent Measurements , Female , Humans , Male , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , RNA, Viral/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 51(3): 180-186, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705481

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral midazolam in children undergoing dental surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of midazolam in children. Patients aged 2-9 years who underwent dental surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into one of the four groups: midazolam 0.2mg/kg dose group (n=30); midazolam 0.21-0.4mg/kg dose group (n=15); midazolam more than 0.41mg/kg dose group (n=15) or the placebo group (n=31). The effectiveness of midazolam on sedation was assessed by the evaluation of vital signs, such as the respiratory and heart rate, oxygen saturation and the patients' reactive behaviors, in comparison with the placebo. RESULTS: The scores of the ratings for sleep, movement and crying, as well as patients' reactions at the moment of separation from their parents and their collaboration with the staff were statistically significantly better among patients who received oral midazolam compared with the placebo. There were statistically significant direct correlations between the doses of midazolam and higher sleep, movement, crying and reaction scores 30min after premedication as well as higher scores of patients upon separation from their parents. There were only a few clinically insignificant side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Oral midazolam, at a single dose from 0.2 to 0.6mg/kg, is effective and safe, and provides the expected sedative effects in children required by premedication for dental surgery.

7.
Blood Transfus ; 12 Suppl 1: s58-62, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24120587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Lithuania, governmentally covered remuneration for whole blood donations prevails. Donors may choose to accept or reject the remuneration. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of nucleic acid testing (NAT) discriminatory-positive markers for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in seronegative, first-time and repeat, remunerated and non-remunerated donations at the National Blood Centre in Lithuania during the period from 2005 to 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All seronegative whole blood and blood component donations were individually analysed by NAT for HIV-1, HBV and HCV. Only discriminatory-positive NAT were classified. The prevalence of discriminatory-positive NAT per 100,000 donations in the donor groups and the odds ratios comparing the remunerated and non-remunerated donations were determined. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for HBV NAT results: 47.42 and 26.29 per 100,000 remunerated first-time and repeat donations, respectively, compared to 10.6 and 3.58 per 100,000 non-remunerated first-time and repeat, seronegative donations, respectively. The differences were also significant for HCV NAT results: 47.42 and 51.99 for remunerated first-time and repeat donations, respectively, compared to 2.12 and 0 per 100,000 non-remunerated first-time and repeat, seronegative donations, respectively. No seronegative, discriminatory-positive NAT HIV case was found. The odds of discriminatory HBV and HCV NAT positive results were statistically significantly higher for both first-time and repeat remunerated donations compared to first-time and repeat non-remunerated donations. DISCUSSION: First-time and repeat remunerated seronegative donations were associated with a statistically significantly higher prevalence and odds for discriminatory-positive HBV and HCV NAT results compared to first-time and repeat non-remunerated donations at the National Blood Centre in Lithuania.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV-1 , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Remuneration , Blood , Blood Banks/statistics & numerical data , Blood Platelets , Blood Safety , HIV Infections/blood , Hepatitis B/blood , Hepatitis C/blood , Humans , Lithuania/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Seroepidemiologic Studies
8.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 19(11): 2349-55, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23974994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Differences between populations might be reflected in their different genetic risk maps to complex diseases, for example, inflammatory bowel disease. We here investigated the role of known inflammatory bowel disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a subset of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) from the Northeastern European countries Lithuania and Latvia and evaluated possible epistatic interactions between these genetic variants. METHODS: We investigated 77 SNPs derived from 5 previously published genome-wide association studies for Crohn's disease and UC. Our study panel comprised 444 Lithuanian and Latvian patients with UC and 1154 healthy controls. Single marker case-control association and SNP-SNP epistasis analyses were performed. RESULTS: We found 14 SNPs tagging 9 loci, including 21q21.1, NKX2-3, MST1, the HLA region, 1p36.13, IL10, JAK2, ORMDL3, and IL23R, to be associated with UC. Interestingly, the association of UC with previously identified variants in the HLA region was not the strongest association in our study (P = 4.34 × 10, odds ratio [OR] = 1.25), which is in contrast to all previously published studies. No association with any disease subphenotype was found. SNP-SNP interaction analysis showed significant epistasis between SNPs in the PTPN22 (rs2476601) and C13orf31 (rs3764147) genes and increased risk for UC (P = 1.64 × 10, OR = 2.44). The association has been confirmed in the Danish study group (P = 0.04, OR = 3.25). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the association of the 9 loci (21q21.1, 1p36.13, NKX2-3, MST1, the HLA region, IL10, JAK2, ORMDL3, and IL23R) with UC in the Lithuanian-Latvian population. SNP-SNP interaction analyses showed that the combination of SNPs in the PTPN22 (rs2476601) and C13orf31 (rs3764147) genes increase the risk for UC.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/metabolism , Colitis, Ulcerative/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 22/genetics , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Europe , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Risk Factors
9.
Ann Hematol ; 91(4): 491-5, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21947086

ABSTRACT

HFE-hemochromatosis is a common autosomal recessive disease caused by HFE gene mutations and characterized as iron overload and failure of different organs. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of C282Y (c.845 G>A), H63D (c.187 C>G), and S65C (c.193A>T) alleles of HFE gene in the Lithuanian population. One thousand and eleven healthy blood donors of Lithuanian nationality were examined in four different ethnic Lithuanian regions to determine HFE gene alleles and genotype frequencies. The samples of DNA were analyzed for the presence of restriction fragment length polymorphism and validated by DNA sequencing. Among 1,011 blood donors tested, the frequency of C282Y, H63D, and S65C alleles were 2.6%, 15.9%, and 1.9%, respectively. One third of the tested subjects (n = 336) had at least one of the C282Y or H63D HFE gene mutations. The screening of Lithuanian blood donors has detected 13 (1.3%) subjects with a genotype C282Y/C282Y or C282Y/H63D responsible for the development of HFE-hemochromatosis. The prevalence of C282Y mutation was significantly higher among the inhabitants of Zemaitija (Somogitia) at the Baltic Sea area (5.9%) in comparison to the regions of continental part of Lithuania (2.4% in Dzukija, 2.3% in Aukstaitija, and 2% in Suvalkija, p < 0.05). These data support the hypothesis that the p.C282Y mutation originated from Scandinavia and spread with the Vikings along the Baltic Sea coast. The first epidemiological investigation of HFE gene mutations in ethnic Lithuanians showed that the frequencies of H63D, C282Y, and S65C of HFE gene alleles are similar to the other North-Eastern Europeans, especially in the Baltic region (Estonia, Latvia), Poland, and part of Russia (Moscow region).


Subject(s)
Hemochromatosis/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Iron Overload/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alleles , Ethnicity/genetics , Female , Gene Frequency , Genotype , Hemochromatosis/epidemiology , Hemochromatosis Protein , Humans , Iron Overload/epidemiology , Lithuania/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Young Adult
10.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 44(10): 791-8, 2008.
Article in Lithuanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19001837

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of nucleic acid testing for viruses in an individual donor test in National Blood Center; the objectives--to analyze the prevalence of infectious disease markers per 100 seronegative remunerated and non-remunerated, first-time and regular whole-blood donations and to assess the odds ratio in detecting the infectious disease markers among remunerated and non-remunerated donations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All seronegative (for compulsory hepatitis B surface antigen, antibodies against hepatitis C, and antibodies against HIV-1/2 tests) whole-blood donations were tested by Procleix Ultrio (Tigris, Chiron) system at the National Blood Center in 2005-2007 in order to identify HIV-1, hepatitis C, and hepatitis B viruses. RESULTS: There were 152229 seronegative whole-blood donations tested by nucleic acid test of viruses in individual donor tests (ID-NAT). In 152146 cases, no infectious disease marker was found, and in 83 cases (or 0.05% of all seronegative whole blood donations), infectious disease markers were determined and confirmed. The prevalences of hepatitis C virus (determined by HCV-NAT method) per 100 seronegative blood donations were as follows: 0.061 among first-time remunerated donations and 0.042 among regular remunerated donations. The prevalences of hepatitis B virus (determined by HBV-NAT method) per 100 seronegative blood donations were as follows: 0.111 among first-time remunerated donations, 0.062 among regular remunerated donations, 0.014 among first-time non-remunerated donations, and 0.005 among regular non-remunerated donations. The remunerated donations showed the higher odds ratios in determining the infectious disease marker by ID-NAT test, comparing with non-remunerated ones. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses, determined by ID-NAT test, per 100 seronegative whole-blood donations is statistically significantly higher in remunerated donations. 2. The remunerated donations had the higher odds ratios in determining the infectious disease marker by ID-NAT test, comparing with non-remunerated ones. 3. In order to maximize the safety of blood and blood products, the continuity of promotion of non-remunerated whole-blood donations program should be ensured, and a compulsory blood donor testing for nucleic acids of viruses in an individual donor test should be introduced.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , HIV Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Humans , Lithuania , Odds Ratio
11.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 40(10): 1004-13, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15516826

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to evaluate average expenditures per case in Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital (KUMH). Case is defined as one treatment episode in particular inpatient department. Five cost groups have been used and defined in monetary terms in each clinical category (profile): labor costs; medication costs; laboratory, radiology and anesthesiology (for surgical clinics) services costs; running costs of medical equipment supply; other costs (including costs of patients' meal, laundry, transportation, communication, auxiliary services, heating, electricity, water, buildings maintenance and repair, etc.). Cases were analyzed using case mix dimensions: gender, age, absence or presence of surgical operation, patient separation status and inpatient service groups. During the study average expenditures per case were estimated: surgery--1161.10 Litas, therapy--1312.15 Litas, obstetrics and gynecology--685.82 Litas, newborn and child care--893.54 Litas and intensive care--1292.92 Litas. Relation between expenditures and case mix variables was measured using correlation analysis method. Using multiple regression analysis method, expenditures per case in each clinical category (profile), according case mix dimensions were predicted. Predicted expenses did not differ much from estimated cost per case.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lithuania , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Models, Theoretical , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...