Remedies for Kidney Ailments in Physica by Hildegard von Bingen (1098-1179).

OBJECTIVES: Hildegard von Bingen (Hildegardis Bingensis; Saint Hildegard), the Sibyl of the Rhine (AD 1098-1179), was a Benedictine abbess, musician, poet, writer, counselor, and healer. As an influential personality of the 12th century, she was advisor of kings, princes, and bishops. Her medical work is collected in 2 books (AD 1152-1163): Physica and Causae et Curae. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of the nephrology-oriented remedies in Physica and compare these with the respective remedies in De Materia Medica (AD 1st century) by Dioscorides Pedanios Anazarbeus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physica is a collection of 9 volumes with an inventory of plants, trees, elements, stones, animals, and metals and describes the associated natural therapeutic properties. We studied all 293 plants (230 herbaceous plants, and 63 trees) in this treatise and recorded all nephrology-related remedies. In addition, we recorded the treatment indications of the same remedies in De Materia Medica. Nephrology-oriented material was defined as any item with nephrology-related pharmacological action (diuretic) or indication (eg, dysuria, nephritis, stones, sand, dropsy). Our findings are presented as simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Among all plants, there were 15 (5.1%) of nephrological interest (11 herbaceous plants and 4 trees). Only some of the natural ingredients mentioned in Physica were found with the same indication in the ancient text, De Materia Medica (9 of 15). The nephrological treatment indications described in Physica included dysuria, nephritic pain, and lithiasis in 87% and dropsy (edema) in 13.0%, which is comparable with 10% in De Materia Medica. CONCLUSIONS: Physica provides a reliable account of medicine in the 12th century as it was practiced by the clergy for generations. It also incorporates Hildegard's personal observations and contemporary folk remedies. This fact is supported by the limited similarity of nephrological remedies in Hildegard's Physica with the respective remedies in De Materia Medica.

Publications With Nephrological Themes Appearing Diachronically in the PubMed Bibliographical Database.

OBJECTIVES: Nephrology in the last 50 years has undergone important scientific developments, which have formally revolutionized clinical practice, including renal biopsy, renal replacement therapy, and transplantation. The understanding of the pathogenesis and the clinical course of renal disease has also steadily improved, resulting in renewal of definitions, classifications, and therapeutics in nephrology. In this context, publications with nephrological content are also expanding. The aim of this bibliographic study was to analyze publications related to nephrology-specific key words in the PubMed database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included the key words "nephrology," "acute renal failure," "renal biopsy," "hemodialysis," "peritoneal dialysis," and "renal transplantation" as search terms in PubMed in May 2022. We also used the term "kidney" as an alternative to "renal." RESULTS: "Nephrology" appeared 185 545 times in searches, with its appearance expanding in the past 3 decades since 1948. The term "acute renal failure" was found in 1932 in 1 publication and in a total number of 92 278 publications. Renal biopsy appeared since 1943 in 18 048 publications. "Hemodialysis" appeared in 182 730 citations, with the first in 1915. "Peritoneal dialysis" appeared in 32 266 citations for the first time in 1901 and in 1946 in human application. One publication on "renal transplantation" appeared in 1946, with 106 075 total publications related to renal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We viewed a clear expansion of nephro-logical publications in the past decades. Hemodialysis remains the most frequently used term in nephrology-related publications. Historical analysis of the PubMed database is useful as a tool to understand the research and publication trends in nephrology, as we approach the new era of precision medicine.

Ancient Wisdom in Pandemic Times: Socrates' Triple Filter Test.

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the biggest problems in the 21st century with unique characteristics, including its alarming rate of spread and the widespread accumulation of information. In the era of advanced information and communication tools, public understanding comes mainly from social media, which shapes and constructs public opinion and reality. Consequently, this can result in many conflicts on the prevention and treatment of the disease. Paradoxically, although vaccination against COVID-19 has proven its efficacy and safety, it remains a profound issue of debate. Nowadays, we navigated the social media sources to find the answers, as Socrates did navigating in the ancient "agora" to find answers, by conducting the Socratic dialectic method and filtering "information" by the triple filter test. Its aim was to imagine an agitated anti-vaccinist coming to Socrates and saying: "Socrates, I want to tell you some information about vaccination." Socrates: Calm down before listening to what you have to say are you sure that everything you are going to tell me is true? Anti-vaccinist: Well, this personal perception comes mainly from social media. Socrates: So, you cannot know if your information is true or not. Is what you are going to tell me good or not? Anti-vaccinist: You know that I am opposed to vaccination. Socrates: And finally, do you think that this is useful? Anti-vaccinist: Well, I am not quite sure. As Socrates would say, if everything you want to tell us you are not sure is true is not good, as you ignore all the "good" proven data, and is not helpful but rather harmful, this could lead the public opinion to confusion and danger. During this pandemic, where various media construct the reality, "ancient wisdom" may promote a mediating or even a filtering effect between information and untrue, harmful, and useless formations of personal perceptions.

Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) Infection in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Epidemiological Cohort Study in North-Eastern Greece.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV), a common cause of viral hepatitis in developing countries, is mainly transmitted via the fecal-oral route, but also may be a prevalent hospital-transmitted agent among patients on regular hemodialysis due to parenteral transmission. Previous epidemiological studies among hemodialysis patients in Greece, using different diagnostic techniques, gave conflicting results. Τhe present study aimed to measure the exposure rate of hemodialysis patients of north-eastern Greece to HEV by estimating the overall seroprevalence, and to identify potential risk factors. Serum samples from all patients attending the hemodialysis centers of north-eastern Greece (n = 6) were tested for the presence of anti-HEV IgG antibodies using a modern and sensitive ELISA (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) technique (Wantai). In total, 42 out of 405 hemodialysis patients were positive for anti-HEV IgG (10.4%), while all samples were negative for HEV RNA when tested using nested RT-PCR. HEV seropositivity among hemodialysis patients was significantly associated with area of residence and contact with specific animals (pork, deer). No association was found with religion, gender distribution and hemodialysis duration. This study showed an increased seroprevalence of HEV among hemodialysis patients in Greece. Agricultural or livestock occupation and place of residence seem to be independent factors that increase the risk of HEV infection. In conclusion, HEV infection calls for the regular screening of hemodialysis patients regardless of the hemodialysis duration or clinical symptoms.